Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T11:00:59.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pragmatist Feminist Utopias: Gilman, Mead, and the Problem of Choice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2022

Aleksandra Hernandez
Aleksandra Hernandez*
Affiliation:
Department of English, University of Miami, 1252 Memorial Drive, Ashe Bldg # 709, Coral Gables, FL, 33146, USA
*
Corresponding author. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article focuses on the pragmatist feminist theories of social reformer Charlotte Perkins Gilman and cultural anthropologist Margaret Mead. It begins by delineating Gilman's understanding of how the material-cultural environment affects the lives of women. Believing the American way of life to be too individualistic, Gilman developed a theory of social change aimed at generating more collectivist ways of living and promoting the economic independence of women. To achieve these ends, Gilman advocated for the reconstruction of the Victorian nursery, which she believed would afford women the choice to pursue a professional career outside of the home, and promote the health of the community. Gilman's social theory is contrasted with that of Margaret Mead, who believed that plans for social reform are best left to readers. Rather than advocate for the adoption of an entirely new cultural practice, Mead sought to acquaint her culturally diverse American readership with the Samoan way of life, so that they might collectively decide how to best address the problem of choice facing young women in the 1920s.

Type
Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , Winter 2022 , pp. 76 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hypatia, a Nonprofit Corporation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, Judith A. 2009. The feminism of Charlotte Perkins Gilman: Sexualities, histories, progressivism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Allen, Judith A. 2015. Progressive portraits: Literature in feminisms of Charlotte Perkins Gilman and Olive Schreiner. In Literature and the development of feminist theory, ed. Goodman, Robin Truth. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, Polly Wynn. 1988. Building domestic liberty: Charlotte Perkins Gilman's architectural feminism. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Andrade, Brandi Hoffman. 2004. Hedda and her sisters: Realism, feminism, and social reform on the American stage (Henrik Ibsen, Norway, George Bernard Shaw, Rachel Crothers, Edith Wharton). PhD diss., University of Texas at Dallas.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Eric. 2013. Composing cultures: Modernism, American literary studies, and the problem of culture. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Cannon, Julie Ann Harms and La Rosa, Adrian De. 2001. Utopian feminism and feminist pedagogy: Charlotte Perkins Gilman and the everyday classroom. Quarterly Journal of Ideology 24 (1/2): 1–22.Google Scholar
Chang, Li-Wen. 2010. Economics, evolution, and feminism in Charlotte Perkins Gilman's utopian fiction. Women's Studies 39 (1): 319–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotkin, George. 1992. Reluctant modernism: American thought and culture, 1880–1900. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Crocco, Margaret and Hendry, Petra Munro. 1999. Pedagogies of resistance: Women educator activists, 1880–1960. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 2004. The descent of man, ed. Moore, James and Desmond, Adrian. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Davis, Cynthia J. 2010. Charlotte Perkins Gilman: A biography. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Cynthia J. and Knight, Denise D.. 2004. Charlotte Perkins Gilman and her contemporaries: Literary and intellectual contexts. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
De Simone, Deborah M. 1995. Charlotte Perkins Gilman and the feminization of education. The Women in Literature and Life Assembly of the National Council of Teachers of English 4.Google Scholar
Deweese-Boyd, Ian T. E. 2015. There are no schools in utopia: John Dewey's democratic education. Education and Culture 31 (2): 69–80.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1922. Democracy and education. New York: The MacMillan Company.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1933. Dewey outlines utopian schools. Totally unlike ours, they would let youth learn by following gifted elders. Sunday, April 23.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1958. Experience and nature. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Dolgin, Ellen Ecker. 2015. Shaw and the actresses franchise league: Staging equality. Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland and Co.Google Scholar
Egan, Maureen L. 1989. Evolutionary theory in the social philosophy of Charlotte Perkins Gilman. Hypatia 4 (1): 102–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Lynne. 2014. “You see, children were the—the raison d’être”: The reproductive futurism of Charlotte Perkins Gilman's Herland. Canadian Review of American Studies 44 (2): 302–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Derek. 1983. Margaret Mead and Samoa: The making and unmaking of an anthropological myth. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. 1898. Women and economics: A study of the economic relation between men and women as a factor in social evolution. Boston: Small, Maynard & Company.Google Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. 1907. A woman's utopia. The Times Magazine 1, January-March.Google Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. 1999. The yellow wallpaper. In The Charlotte Perkins Gilman reader, ed. J, Ann. Lane. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. 2005. What Diantha did. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. 2012. Herland and related writings, ed. Sutton-Ramspeck, Beth. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Hayden, Deloris. 1981. The grand domestic revolution: A history of feminist designs for American homes, neighborhoods, and cities. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine. 2002. Writing machines. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegeman, Susan. 1999. Patterns for America: Modernism and the concept of culture. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudak, Jennifer. 2003. The social inventor: Charlotte Perkins Gilman and the (re)production of perfection. Women's Studies 32 (4): 455–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, Carol Farley. 1995. Charlotte Perkins Gilman: Her progress toward utopia with selected writings. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Brian. 1998. Feminism, utopian and scientific: Charlotte Perkins Gilman and the prison of the familiar. American Studies 39 (1): 93–113.Google Scholar
Love, Rosaleen. 1983. Darwinism and feminism: The “woman question” in the life and work of Olive Schreiner and Charlotte Perkins Gilman. In The wider domain of evolutionary thought, ed. Oldroyd, David and Langham, Ian. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
McKenna, Erin. 2001. The task of utopia: A pragmatist and feminist perspective. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2001.Google Scholar
Mead, Margaret. 2001. Coming of age in Samoa: A psychological study of primitive youth for western civilization. New York: Perennial.Google Scholar
Moylan, Tom. 2014. Demand the impossible: Science fiction and the utopian imagination. Oxford: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Louise Michele. 1996. Coming of age but not in Samoa: Reflections on Margaret Mead's legacy for western liberal feminism. American Quarterly 48 (2): 233–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Louise Michele. 1998. White women's rights: The racial origins of feminism in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pfaelzer, Jean. 1988. The utopian novel in America, 1886–1896: The politics of form. Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, Michael. 2018. The last utopians: Four late nineteenth-century visionaries and their legacy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schoenbach, Lisi. 2012. Pragmatic modernism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schwab, Gabrielle. 2012. Literary ethnographies: Literature, culture, and subjectivity. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Shankman, Paul. 2009. The thrashing of Margaret Mead: Anatomy of an anthropological controversy. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock. 2001. Can a “man-hating” feminist also be a pragmatist? On Charlotte Perkins Gilman. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 15 (2): 74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suvin, Darko. 2016. Metamorphoses of science fiction: On the poetics and history of a literary genre, ed. Canavan, Gerry. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallis, Raymond. 1998. In defense of realism. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Torres Colón, Gabriel Alejandro, and Hobbs, Charles A.. 2015. The intertwining of culture and nature: Franz Boas, John Dewey, and Deweyan strands of American anthropology. Journal of the History of Ideas 76 (1): 139–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upin, Jane S. 1993. Charlotte Perkins Gilman: Instrumentalism beyond Dewey. Hypatia 8 (2): 38–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walls, Laura Dassow. 1993. Seeing new worlds: Henry David Thoreau and nineteenth-century natural science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Watson, Timothy. 2012. Culture writing: Literature and anthropology in the midcentury Atlantic world. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weinbaum, Alys Eve. 2001. Writing feminist genealogy: Charlotte Perkins Gilman, racial nationalism, and the reproduction of maternalist feminism. Feminist Studies 27 (2): 271–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, Cindy. 2012. When is now? Poe's aesthetics of temporality. In American literature's aesthetic dimensions, ed. Weinstein, Cindy and Looby, Christopher. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar