Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:53:13.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Black Women, “In Defense of Transracialism,” and Imperial Harm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Abstract

This essay is a response to the events surrounding Hypatia's publication of “In Defense of Transracialism.” It does not take up the question of “transracialism” itself, but rather attempts to shed light both on what some black women may have experienced following from the publication of the article and on how we might understand this experience as harm. It also suggests one way for feminist journals to reduce the likelihood of similar harms occurring in the future. I begin by describing a discussion that occurred in my classroom that bears some resemblance to the much larger debate that emerged around Hypatia. Next, I elaborate a concept of imperial harm. I then address how this concept comes to be relevant to the experience of black women within the discipline of philosophy in general, before briefly describing how academic feminism (including feminist philosophy) has served as a particular site of imperial harm for black women. Finally, touching on the idea of expressive harm, I conclude with an appeal for the adoption of more feminist publication ethics.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Elizabeth S., and Pildes, Richard H. 2000. Expressive theories of law: A general restatement. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148 (5): 1503–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dotson, Kristie. 2012. How is this paper philosophy? Comparative Philosophy 3 (1): 329.Google Scholar
Fricker, Miranda. 2012. The wrong of testimonial injustice. In Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lorde, Audre. 2012. Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Berkeley: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Open Letter to Hypatia. 2017. https://archive.is/lUeR4.Google Scholar
Ortega, Mariana. 2006. Being lovingly, knowingly ignorant: White feminism and women of color. Hypatia 21 (3): 5674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Settles, Isis H., Buchanan, NiCole T., and Dotson, Kristie. 2018. Scrutinized but not recognized: (In) visibility and hypervisibility experiences of faculty of color. Journal of Vocational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.06.003.Google Scholar
Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. 2012. Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Tuvel, Rebecca. 2017. In defense of transracialism. Hypatia 32 (2): 263–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yancy, George. 2012. Inappropriate philosophical subjects? Introduction. In Reframing the practice of philosophy bodies of color, bodies of knowledge. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar