Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:55:39.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mentorship in Method: Philosophy and Experienced Agency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Ami Harbin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Against the background of the exclusion of many feminist methodologies from mainstream philosophy, and in light of the methodological challenges of providing accounts of experience responsive to the lives of agents, in this paper I return to early feminist philosophers of emotion to highlight how they anticipate and respond to methodological criticisms. Sue Campbell (1956–2011) was one philosopher who used methodological quandaries to strengthen her account of the formation and expression of feelings (Campbell 1997). By rereading selected texts together intentionally for their structural and methodological strategies, I emphasize the power of formal characteristics to make insightful claims about experience possible. I consider how feminist philosophers of “experienced agency” can put these strategies to use in facing ongoing methodological criticisms, taking as a case study an account of how it can feel to act responsibly against injustice.

Type
Cluster: In Relation: Exploring the Work of Sue Campbell
Information
Hypatia , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , Spring 2014 , pp. 476 - 492
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babbitt, Susan E. 1996. Impossible dreams: Rationality, integrity, and moral imagination. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Bartky, Sandra. 1990. Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire. 1984. Cognitive emotions? In What is an emotion? Classic readings in philosophical psychology, ed. Calhoun, Cheshire and Solomon, Robert C.New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Sue. 1997. Interpreting the personal: Expression and the formation of feelings. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Sue. 2003. Relational remembering: Rethinking the memory wars. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1991. What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dotson, Kristie. 2011. Concrete flowers: Contemplating the profession of philosophy. Hypatia 26 (2): 403–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dotson, Kristie. 2012. How is this paper philosophy? Comparative Philosophy 3 (1): 3–29.Google Scholar
Frye, Marilyn. 1983. The politics of reality: Essays in feminist theory. Freedom, Calif.: The Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Garry, Ann. 1995. A minimally decent philosophical method?Analytic philosophy and feminism. Hypatia 10 (3): 7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbin, Ami. 2012. Bodily disorientation and moral change. Hypatia 27 (2): 261–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbin, Ami. Forthcoming. Disorientation and the medicalization of struggle. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics.Google Scholar
Harbin, Ami. Under review. The disorientations of acting against injustice.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison. 1997. Love and knowledge: Emotion in feminist epistemology. In Feminist social thought: A reader, ed. Diana Tietjens Meyers. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1999. Practical philosophy. Trans. Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Le Doeuff, Michèle. 2002. The philosophical imaginary. New York: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
Lugones, María. 1990. Structure/antistructure and agency under oppression. Journal of Philosophy 87 (10): 500–07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, Paulette. 2010. Unsettling the settler within: Indian residential schools, truth telling, and reconciliation in Canada. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Rooney, Phyllis. 2010. Philosophy, adversarial argumentation, and embattled reason. Informal Logic 30 (3): 203–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheman, Naomi. 1980. Anger and the politics of naming. In Women and language in literature and society, ed. McConnell‐Ginet, Sally, Borker, Ruth and Furman, Nelly. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Sherwin, Susan. 1989. Philosophical methodology and feminist methodology: Are they compatible? In Women, knowledge, and reality: Explorations in feminist philosophy, ed. Garry, Ann and Pearsall, Marilyn. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth. 1989. Anger and insubordination. In Women, knowledge, and reality: Explorations in feminist philosophy, ed. Garry, Ann and Pearsall, Marilyn. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Tyson, Sarah. 2011. Reclaiming the history of philosophy: The opportunities of exclusion. Midwest Society for Women in Philosophy Conference, Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill., November 4.Google Scholar