Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:30:22.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mary Astell: Including Women's Voices in Political Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Penny A. Weiss
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Writing in the seventeenth century, Mary Astell offers some splendid models of what it can mean to include women in determining the purposes of politics, in marking the boundaries of issues on the political agenda, and in analyzing particular political concepts. A contending voice in early modern philosophy, Astell's contributions to political thought are made more visible here by contrast with Thomas Hobbes, with whom she was familiar and somewhat sympathetic.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , Summer 2004 , pp. 63 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Astell, Mary. 1986a. A serious proposal to the ladies for the advancement of their true and greatest interest. In The first English feminist, ed. Hill, Bridget. New York: St. Martín's Press.Google Scholar
Astell, Mary. 1986b. The Christian religion as profess'd by a daughter of the Church of England. In The first English feminist, ed. Hill, Bridget. New York: St. Martín's Press.Google Scholar
Astell, Mary. 1996a. An impartial enquiry into the causes of rebellion and civil war in this kingdom. In Astell: Political writings, ed. Springborg, Patricia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Astell, Mary. 1996b. Some reflections upon marriage. In Astell: Political writings, ed. Springborg, Patricia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atherton, Margaret ed. 1994. Women philosophers of the early modern period. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Kosinski, Blumenfeld ed. 1997. The selected writings of Christine de Pizan. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Carroll, Berenice. 1990. The politics of “originality”: Women and the class system of the intellect. Journal of Women's History 2 (2): 136–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Berenice. 2000. Notes. In Women's political and social thought, ed. Smith, Hilda and Carroll, Berenice. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
de La Cruz, Sor Juana Inés. 1987. Reply to Sor Philothea. In A woman of genius: The intellectual autobiography of Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz. Trans. Peden, Margaret Sayers. Salisbury, Conn.: Lime Rock Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1916. Democracy and education. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Duran, Jane. 2000. Mary Astell: A pre‐Humean Christian empiricist and feminist. In Presenting women philosophers, ed. Tougas, Cecile and Ebenreck, Sara Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. 1998. Herland. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1987. Non‐contractual society: A feminist view. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13 (supplemental volume): 111–37.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1994. Leviathan. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Johnson, E. Pauline. 1893. A red girl's reasoning. 32 2 (1): 19–28.Google Scholar
Kinnaird, Joan. 1983. Mary Astell: Inspired by ideas. In Feminist theorists: Three centuries of key women thinkers, ed. Spender, Dale. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. 1962. The political theory of possessive individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. 1968. Introduction. In Leviathan, by Thomas Hobbes. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas. 1678. De la recherche de la verité: ou l'on traitte de la nature de I'esprit de l'homme, & de l'usage qu'il en doit faire pour éviter l'erreur dans les sciences. Paris. N.P.Google Scholar
Millet, Kate. 1969. Sexual politics. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar
Minh‐ha, Trinh T. 1989. Woman, native, other: Writing postcoloniality and feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
George, Orwell 1992, 1984. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1990. The sexual contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Peden, Margaret Sayers, trans. 1987. A woman of genius: The intellectual autobiography of Sor juana Inés de la Cruz. Salisbury, Conn.: Lime Rock Press.Google Scholar
Perry, Ruth. 1986. The celebrated Mary Astell: An early English feminist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Perry, Ruth. 1990. Mary Astell and the feminist critique of possessive individualism. Eighteenth-Century Studies 23 (4): 444–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, R. S. 1962. Introduction. In Leviathan, by Hobbes, Thomas. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
de Pizan, Christine. 1997. The selected writings of Christine de Pizan, ed. Blumenfeld‐Kosinski, Renate. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Plattel, Martín. 1972. Utopian and critical thinking. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1974. Plato's republic. Trans. Grube, G. M. A.Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques. 1968. La nouvelle Héloise: Julie, or the new Eloise. Trans. McDowell, Judith. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Hilda. 1982. Reasons disciples: Seventeenth‐century English feminists. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth. 1988. Inessential woman: Problems of exclusion in feminist thought. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Spender, Dale. 1982. Women of ideas and what men have done to them. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Springborg, Patricia. 1995. Mary Astell (1666–1731), Critic of Locke. American Political Science Review 89 (September): 621–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springborg, Patricia. 1996. Introduction. In Astell: Political writings, ed. Springborg, Patricia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Stephano, Christine. 1983. Masculinity as ideology in political theory: Hobbesian man considered. 32 6: 633–44.Google Scholar
Thiele, Beverly. 1986. Vanishing acts in social and political thought: Tricks of the trade. In Feminist challenges: Social and political theory, ed. Pateman, Carole and Gross, Elizabeth. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Waters, Kristin. 2000. Women and men political theorists: Enlightened conversations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Weiss, Penny. 1996. The gendered fate of political theorists. In Feminist interpretations of Mary Wollstonecraft, ed. Falco, Maria. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. 1975. Maria; or, the wrongs of woman. New York: Norton.Google Scholar