Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:34:48.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Liberating Anger, Embodying Knowledge: A Comparative Study of María Lugones and Zen Master Hakuin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Jen McWeeny
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper strengthens the theoretical ground of feminist analyses of anger by explaining how the angers of the oppressed are ways of knowing. Relying on insights created through the juxtaposition of Latina feminism and Zen Buddhism, I argue that these angers are special kinds of embodied perceptions that surface when there is a profound lack of fit between a particular bodily orientation and its framing world of sense. As openings to alternative sensibilities, these angers are transformative, liberatory, and deeply epistemological.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , Spring 2010 , pp. 295 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by Jen McWeeny

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anzaldúa, Gloria. 1987/1999. Borderlands/La Frontera: The new mestiza. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.Google Scholar
Burrow, Sylvia. 2005. The political structure of emotion: From dismissal to dialogue. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 20 (4): 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Sue. 1994. Being dismissed: The politics of emotional expression. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 9 (3): 46–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cataldi, Sue L. 1993. Emotion, depth, and flesh: A study of sensitive space. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Charland, L. 1996. Feeling and representing: Computational theory and the modularity of affect. Synthese 105: 273–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donner, Wendy. 2002. Feminist ethics and anger: A feminist Buddhist reflection. American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy 1 (2): 67–70.Google Scholar
Döring, Sabine A. 2003. Explaining action by emotion. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211): 214–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumoulin, Henrich. 2005. Zen Buddhism: A history, Vol. 2, Japan. Trans. James W. Heisig and Paul Knitter. Bloomington, Ind.: World Wisdom.Google Scholar
Frye, Marilyn. 1983. The politics of reality. Berkeley: The Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, Charles. 2002. Resentment and reality: Buddhism on moral responsibility. American Philosophical Quarterly 39 (4): 359–72.Google Scholar
Hershock, Peter D. 2003. Renegade emotion: Buddhist precedents for returning rationality to the heart. Philosophy East and West: A Quarterly of Comparative Philosophy 53 (2): 251–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hori, G.Victor Sōgen. 2000. Kōan and kenshō in the Rinzai Zen curriculum. In The kōan: Texts and contexts in Zen Buddhism, ed. Heine, Steven and Wright, Dale S.New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 280–315.Google Scholar
Jordan, June. 1982/1985. Report from the Bahamas. In On call: Political essays. Boston: South End Press, pp. 39–49.Google Scholar
Kasulis, T.P. 1981. Zen action/Zen person. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Lorde, Audre. 1984a. Eye to eye: Black women, hatred, and anger. In Sister outsider. Berkeley: The Crossing Press, pp. 145–75.Google Scholar
Lorde, Audre. 1984b. The uses of anger: Women responding to racism. In Sister outsider. Berkeley: The Crossing Press, pp. 124–33.Google Scholar
Lugones, María. 2003. Pilgrimages/peregrinajes: Theorizing coalition against multiple oppressions. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Lugones, María. 2006. On complex communication. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 21 (3): 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazis, Glen A. 1993. Emotion and embodiment: Fragile ontology. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Merleau‐Ponty, Maurice. 1945/2002. The phenomenology of perception. Trans. Colin Smith. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meyers, Diana Tietjens. 2004. Emotion and heterodox moral perception: An essay in moral social psychology. In Being yourself: Essays on identity, action, and social life. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 137–57.Google Scholar
Narayan, Uma. 1988. Working together across difference: Some considerations on emotions and political practice. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 3 (2): 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, Mariana. 2001. “New Mestizas,”“‘world’‐travelers,” and “dasein”: Phenomenology and the multi‐voiced, multi‐cultural self. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 16 (3): 1–29.Google Scholar
Parkes, Graham. 1995. Nietzsche and Zen Master Hakuin on the roles of emotion and passion. In Emotions in Asian thought, ed. Marks, Joel and Ames, Roger T.Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 214–34.Google Scholar
Prinz, Jesse J. 2004. Gut reactions: A perceptual theory of emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sasaki, Ruth Fuller, trans. 1975. The record of Lin‐chi. Kyoto: The Institute for Zen Studies.Google Scholar
Scheman, Naomi. 1980. Anger and the politics of naming. In Women, language, and society, ed. McConnell‐Ginet, Sally, Borker, Ruth, and Furman, Nelly. New York: Praeger, pp. 174–87.Google Scholar
Schloegl, Irmgard, trans. 1976. The Zen teaching of Rinzai. Berkeley: Shambhala.Google Scholar
Scorsese, Martin. 2007. The departed, DVD. Burbank: Warner Brothers.Google Scholar
Sekida, Katsuki, trans. 1977. Two Zen classics: Mumonkan and Hekiganroku. New York: Weatherhill.Google Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth V. 1989. Anger and insubordination. In Women, knowledge, and reality, ed. Garry, Ann and Pearsall, Marilyn. Boston: Unwin Hyman, pp. 263–73.Google Scholar
Vernezze, Peter J. 2008. Moderation or the middle way: Two approaches to anger. Philosophy East and West: A Quarterly of Comparative Philosophy 58 (1): 2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waddell, Norman, trans. 2001. Wild ivy: The spiritual autobiography of Zen Master Hakuin. Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar
Yampolsky, Philip. 1971a. Introduction: Hakuin and Rinzai Zen. In The Zen Master Hakuin: Selected writings. Trans. Philip Yampolsky. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Yampolsky, Philip. trans. 1971b. The Zen Master Hakuin: Selected writings. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar