Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T13:48:10.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Justification and Queer Method, or Leaving Philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Gayle Salamon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Musings
Information
Hypatia , Volume 24 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Oppression and Moral Agency: Essays in Honor of Claudia Card , Winter 2009 , pp. 225 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by Gayle Salamon

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, Sara. 2006. Queer phenomenology: orientations, objects, others. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, Rachel. 2005. Musings: Feminine stubble. Hypatia 20 (3): 230–37.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1993. Imitation and gender insubordination. In The lesbian and gay studies reader, ed. Abelove, Henry, Barale, Michèle Aina and Halperin, David M. 307–20, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. 1996. Literary theory: an introduction. 2nd ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Halperin, David. 2002. Deviant teaching. Michigan Feminist Studies 16:1–30.Google Scholar
Nestle, Howell, and Wilchins, Riki, eds. 2002. Genderqueer: voices from beyond the sexual binary. Los Angeles: Alyson Press.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 1993. Tendencies. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar