Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:17:56.835Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction: Contested Terrains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu‐Lughod, Lila. 2002. Do Muslim women really need saving? Anthropological reflections on cultural relativism and its others. American Anthropologist 104 (3): 7890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, Sara. 2006. Queer phenomenology: Orientations, objects, others. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barad, Karen. 2003. Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs 28 (3): 801–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, Sumi, Crenshaw, Kimberlé, and McCall, Leslie. 2013. Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs 38 (4): 785810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 2004. Black sexual politics: African Americans, gender, and the new racism. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum: Feminism in the Law: Theory Practice and Criticism (1) (1989): 139–67.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1991. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Angela Y., and Kelley, Robin D. G. 2012. The meaning of freedom: And other difficult dialogues. San Francisco: City Lights Publishers.Google Scholar
Dixon, Deborah P. 2015. Feminist geopolitics: Material states. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Dixon, Deborah P., and Marston, Sallie A. 2011. Introduction: Feminist engagements with geopolitics. Gender, Place & Culture 18 (4): 445–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowler, Lorraine, and Sharp, Joanne. 2001. A feminist geopolitics? Space & Polity 5 (3): 165–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, Miranda. 2009. Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
hooks, bell. 1984. Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Lowe, Lisa. 2015. The intimacies of four continents. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lugones, Maria. 2003. Pilgrimages/Peregrinajes: Theorizing coalition against multiple oppressions. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Medina, José. 2012. The epistemology of resistance: Gender and racial oppression, epistemic injustice, and resistant imaginations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 2002. “Under Western eyes” revisited: Feminist solidarity through anticapitalist struggles. Signs 28 (2): 499535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohlhaus, Gaile Jr. 2011. Wrongful requests and strategic refusals to understand. In Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science, ed. Grasswick, Heidi E.Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Puar, Jasbir. 2011. “I would rather be a cyborg than a goddess”: Intersectionality, assemblage, and affective politics. Transversal, January. http://eipcp.net/transversal/0811/puar/en (accessed April 20, 2017).Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1996. The Spivak reader: Selected works of Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, ed. MacLean, Gerald M. and Landry, Donna. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Shannon, and Tuana, Nancy, eds. 2007. Race and epistemologies of ignorance. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Urs, Tara. 2014. Coercive feminism. Columbia Human Rights Law Review 46 (1) (Fall): 85157.Google Scholar