No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Introduction: Contemporary Feminist Philosophy in German
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 March 2020
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Hypatia , Volume 20 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Contemporary Feminist Philosophy in German , Spring 2005 , pp. viii - xvi
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2005 by Hypatia, Inc.
References
Andreas‐Grisebach, Manon, and Weisshaupt, Brigitte, eds. 1986. Was Philosophinnen denken II. Zurich: Ammann Verlag.Google Scholar
Bendkowski, Halina, and Weisshaupt, Brigitte, eds. 1983. Was Philosophinnen denken. Erne Documentation. Zurich: Ammann Verlag.Google Scholar
Beinssen‐Hesse, Silke, and Rigby, Kate. 1996. Out of the shadows: Contemporary German feminism. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Deutscher, Penelope, ed. 2000. Hypatia special issue: Contemporary French women philosophers. Hypatia 15 (4).Google Scholar
Ecker, Gisela, ed. 1986. Feminist aesthetics. Trans. Anderson, Harriet. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Heinz, Marion, and Doyé, Sabine, eds. 1996. Feministische Philosophie: Bibliographie 1970–1995. Bielefeld: Kleine.Google Scholar
Heinz, Marion, and Nordmeyer, Meike, eds. 2002. Feministische Philosophie: Bibliographie 1998–1999. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Heinz, Marion, and Nordmeyer, Meike eds. 1999. Feministische Philosophie: Bibliographie 1996–1997. Bielefeld: Kleine.Google Scholar
Klinger, Cornelia. 1998. Aesthetics. In A companion to feminist philosophy, ed. Jaggar, Alison M. and Marion Young, Iris. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Klinger, Cornelia. 1997. The concepts of the sublime and the beautiful in Kant and Lyotard. In Feminist interpretations of lmmanuel Kant, ed. May Schott, Robin. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
List, Elisabeth, and Studer, Herlinde, eds. 1989. Denkverhältnisse. Feminismus und Kritik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Maihofer, Andrea. 1998. Care. In A companion to feminist philosophy, ed. Jaggar, Alison M. and Marion Young, Iris. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nagl‐Docekal, Herta, ed. 2004. Feminist philosophy. Trans. Vester, Katharina. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Nagl‐Docekal, Herta, ed. 1999. The feminist critique of reason revisited. Hypatia 14 (1): 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagl‐Docekal, Herta, ed. 1998. Modern moral and political philosophy. In A companion to feminist philosophy, ed. Jaggar, Alison M. and Marion Young, Iris. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nagl‐Docekal, Herta, ed. 1997. Feminist ethics: How it could benefit from Kant's moral philosophy. In Feminist interpretations of lmmanuel Kant, ed. May Schott, Robin. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Nagl‐Docekal, Herta, ed. 1990. Feministische Philosophie. Wiener Reihe, vol. 4. Vienna, Munich: Olden‐bourg Verlag.Google Scholar
Nagl‐Docekal, Herta, and Pauer‐Studer, Herlinde, eds. 1996. Politische Theorie. Differenz und Lebensqualität. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Nagl‐Docekal, Herta, and Pauer‐Studer, Herlinde, eds. 1993. Jenseits der Geschlechtermoral. Beiträge zur feministischen Ethik. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
Nagl‐Docekal, Herta, and Pauer‐Studer, Herlinde, eds. 1990. Denken der Geschlechterdifferenz. Neue Fragen und Perspektiven der feministischen Philosophie. Vienna: Wiener Frauenverlag.Google Scholar
Nagl‐Docekal, Herta, and Klinger, Cornelia, eds. 2000. Continental philosophy in feminist perspective: Re‐reading the canon in German. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Rumpf, Mechthild. 1993. Mystical Aura. In On Max Horkheimer: New perspectives, ed. Benhabib, Seyla, Bonss, Wolfgang, and McCole, John. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stoller, Silvia. 2000. Reflections on Feminist Merleau‐Ponty Skepticism. Hypatia 15 (1): 175–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar