Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:40:17.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ideas in the Mind: Gender and Knowledge in the Seventeenth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Paula Findlen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

“Neither doth our Sex delight or understand Philosophy.” (Margaret Cavendish, 1664)

Type
Review Essay
Information
Hypatia , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , Winter 2002 , pp. 183 - 196
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Åkerman, Susanna. 1991. Queen Christina and her circle: The transformation of a seventeenth‐century philosophical libertine. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Astell, Mary. 1997. A serious proposal to the ladies, parts I & II. ed. Springborg, Patricia. London: Pickering & a Chatto.Google Scholar
Atherton, Margaret, ed. 1994. Women philosophers of the early modern period. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Battigelli, Anna. 1998. Margaret Cavendish and the exiles of the mind. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Bertoloni Meli, Domenico, 1999. Caroline, Leibniz, and Clarke. Journal of the History of Ideas 60: 469–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom, John J., ed. and trans. 1978. Descartes: His moral philosophy and psychology. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Bordo, Susan, 1987. The flight to objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and culture. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Bowerbank, Sylvia, and Mendelsohn, Sara eds., 2000. Paper bodies: A Margaret Cavendish Reader. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Literary Texts.Google Scholar
Cavendish, Margaret, 1655. The world's olio. London: J. Martin and J. Allestrye.Google Scholar
Cavendish, Margaret, 1994. The blazing world and other writings. ed. Lilley, Kate. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, U. K.: Penguin.Google Scholar
Cavendish, Margaret, 1997. Sociable letters. Ed. Fitzmaurice, James. New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar
Cavendish, Margaret, 1999. The convent of pleasure and other plays. Ed. Shaver, Anne. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Conway, Anne. 1996. The principles of the most ancient and modern philosophy. Ed. and Trans. Coudert, Allison P. and Corse, Taylor. Cambridge, U. K.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De La Cruz, Sor Juana Inés. 1997. Poems, protest, and a dream. ed. and Trans. Sayers Peden, Margaret. Intro. Stevens, Ilan. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, U. K.: Penguin.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 1989. Correspondance avec Elisabeth et autres lettres. Ed. Beyssade, Jean‐Marie and Beyssade, Michelle. Paris: Flammirion.Google Scholar
Goodman, Dena. 1994. Republic of letters: A cultural history of the French Enlightenment. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Francis. 1997. Living in the neighbourhood of science: Mary Evelyn, Margaret Cavendish and the Greshmites. In Women, science, and medicine 1500‐1700: Mothers and sisters of the Royal Society. Ed. Hunter, Lynette and Hutton, Sarah. Gloucestershire, U.K.: Sutton Publishing, 198–217.Google Scholar
Harth, Erica. 1992. Cartesian women: Versions and subversions of rational discourse in the old regime. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, Lynette, and Hutton, Sarah eds., 1997. Women, science, andmedicine 1500‐1700: Mothers and sisters of the Royal Society. Gloucestershire, U. K.: Sutton Publishing.Google Scholar
Hutton, Sarah, 1997. Anne Conway, Margaret Cavendish and seventeenth‐century scientific thought. In Women, science, and medicine 1500‐1700: Mothers and sisters of the Royal Society, ed. Hunter, Lynette and Hutton, Sarah. Gloucestershire, U.K.: Sutton Publishing, 218–34.Google Scholar
Lewalski, Barbara Kieker. 1993. Writing women in Jacobean England. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Marinella, Lucrezia. 1999. The nobility and excellence of women and the defects and vices of men. ed. and Trans. Dunhill, Anne. Intro. Panizza, Letizia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, Linda Lopez, ed. 1989. Special Issue: The History of Women in Philosophy. Hypatia 4 (1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merchant, Carolyn. 1980. The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Merrim, Stephanie. 1999. Early modern women's writing and Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Nicolson, Marjorie Hope, ed. 1992. The Conway letters. Rev. ed.Intro. and new material Sara Hutton. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Nye, Andrea. 1999. The princess and the philosopher: Letters of Elisabeth of the palatine to René Descartes. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Paz, Octavio. 1988. Sor Juana or, The traps of faith. Trans. Peden, Margaret Sayers. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Schiebinger, Londa. 1989. The mind has no sex? Women in the origins of modern science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 1996. The scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Hilda. 1982. Reason's disciples: Seventeenth‐century English feminists. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Teague, Frances M. 1998. Bathsua Makin, woman of learning. Lewisburg, Pa.: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar
Totaro, Pina, ed. 1999. Donne, filosofia e cultura nel seicento. Rome: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche.Google Scholar