Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T17:03:26.050Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Divine Horizon: Rethinking Political Community in Luce Irigaray's “Divine Women”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Abstract

The question of the transcendent, that which operates above and beyond the material stuff of the world, remains an enduring one for feminism, bound up as it is with the foundations of feminism's corporeal politics and the definition of its political subject. With the specificity of the situated and meaningful body grounding feminist politics, the universal and neutral status of the speaking subject has been diagnosed as masculine, and unable to properly account for sexed differences. On this basis, political community, collectivity forged along the lines of a common identity, is considered important in the realization of feminist political goals, yet is also problematic in view of its reliance upon a universal category of identity through which to motivate for political change. Acknowledging these tensions, this paper revisits Luce Irigaray's essay “Divine Women” to suggest that in her rethinking of the divine as a shared horizon through which women can potentially achieve autonomy, the nature of the transcendent, the universal, and the identity of the feminine are also reconfigured in surprising ways. In a specific address to the dilemma of political community, Irigaray makes available a notion of the divine that is already differently inhabited.

Type
Found Cluster on Luce Irigaray
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armour, Ellen T. 2003. Divining differences: Irigaray and religion. In Religion in French feminist thought: Critical perspectives, ed. Joy, Morny, O'Grady, Kathleen, and Poxon, Judith L.London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. 1989. The politics of ontological difference. In Between feminism and psychoanalysis, ed. Teresa, Brennan. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Capra, Fritjof, and Steindl‐Rast, David. 1992. Belonging to the universe: Explorations on the frontiers of science and spirituality. San Francisco: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Feuerbach, Ludwig. 1843/1881. The essence of Christianity. 2d ed. Trans. Marian Evans. London: Trübner and Co.Google Scholar
Gross, Elizabeth. 1986. Philosophy, subjectivity and the body: Kristeva and Irigaray and Conclusion: What is feminist theory? In Feminist challenges: Social and political theory, ed. Pateman, Carol and Gross, Elizabeth. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1989. Sexual subversions: Three French feminists. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1992. Conclusion: A note on essentialism and difference. In Feminist knowledge: Critique and construct, ed. Gunew, Sneja. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gatens, Moira. 1996. Imaginary bodies: Ethics, power and corporeality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harvey, Van A. 1995. Feuerbach and the interpretation of religion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1986. Divine women. Trans. Stephen Muecke. Sydney: Occasional Papers 8, Local Consumption Publications.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1993a. An ethics of sexual difference. Trans. Burke, Carolyn and Gill, Gillian C.Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1993b. Sexes and genealogies. Trans. Gill, Gillian C.New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Jantzen, Grace M. 1998. Becoming divine: Towards a feminist philosophy of religion. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Alison. 1995. Luce Irigaray and divine matter. In Women and representation, ed. Knight, Diana and Still, Judith. Nottingham, UK: Nottingham Modern Languages Publications Archive, University of Nottingham. http://mlpa.nottingham.ac.uk/archive/00000050/ (accessed April 26, 2010).Google Scholar
Martin, Alison. 2003. Introduction: Luce Irigaray and the culture of difference. Theory, Culture and Society 20 (3): 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Alison. 2003. The sex of nature: A reinterpretation of Irigaray's metaphysics and political thought. Hypatia 18 (3): 6068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar