Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T02:17:47.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Defeating Bigenderism: Changing Gender Assumptions in the Twenty-first Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Miqqi Alicia Gilbert
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bigenderism maintains there are only two genders, which correspond with the two sexes, male and female. Basic bigenderism requires that legal documents and public institutions designate a single invariant gender (that is, sex). Strict bigenderism applies these categories in a social context that stigmatizes “imperfect” men and women who do not reach ideals set by the bigenderist schema. I discuss these concepts and their implications, present three models that successively weaken bigenderist assumptions, and argue for the most radical of the three.

Type
Transgender Studies and Feminism: Theory, Politics, and Gendered Realities
Information
Hypatia , Volume 24 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Transgender Studies and Feminism: Theory, Politics, and Gendered Realities , Summer 2009 , pp. 93 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bem, Sandra L. 1993. The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bem, Sandra L. .1995. Dismantling gender polarization and compulsory heterosexuality: Should we turn the volume down or up? Journal of Sex Research 32 (4): 329–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettcher, Talia Mae. 2007. Evil deceivers and make‐believers: On transphobic violence and the politics of illusion. Hypatia 22 (3): 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdwhistell, Ray L. 1970. Masculinity and femininity as display. In Kinesics and context: Essays on body motion communication. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 39–46.Google Scholar
Bornstein, Kate. 1994. Gender outlaw: On men, women, and the rest of us. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Broverman, Neal. 2008. Mixed messages. Advocate, no. 1005. Available at http://www.advocate.com/print_article_ektid52689(accessed March 12, 2008).Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1991. Imitation and gender substitution. In Inside/out: Lesbian theories, gay theories, ed. Fuss, D.London: Routledge, pp. 13–31.Google Scholar
Chodorow, Nancy J. 1995. Gender as a personal and cultural construction. Signs 20 (1): 516–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ducat, Stephen. 2004. The wimp factor: Gender gaps, holy wars, and the politics of anxious masculinity. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Elliot, Patricia. 2004. Who gets to be a woman?: Feminist politics and the question of trans‐inclusion. Atlantis 29 (1): 13–20.Google Scholar
Friedman, Marilyn. 1996. The unholy alliance of sex and gender. Metaphilosophy 27 (1–2): 78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furth, Charlotte. 1993. Androgynous males and deficient females: Biology and gender boundaries in 16th and 17th century China. In The lesbian and gay studies reader, ed. Abelove, Henry, Barale, Michéle A., and Halperin, David M.New York: Routledge, pp. 479–97.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice‐Hall.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Michael A. 2000. The transgendered philosopher. International Journal of Transgenderism 3: Available at http://www.symposion.com/ijt (accessed January 5, 2008).Google Scholar
Gilbert, Michael A. 2001. A sometime woman: Gender choice and cross‐socialization. In Unseen genders: Beyond the binaries, ed. Haynes, F. and McKenna, T.New York: Peter Lang, pp. 41–50.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Miqqi Alicia. 2003. Bigenderism. Transgender tapestry 102: 16–7.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1979. Gender Display. In Gender advertisements. New York: Harper & Row, 1–9.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1977. The arrangement between the sexes. Theory and Society 4 (3): 301–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halberstam, Judith. 1998. Female masculinity. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Hale, C. Jacob. 1996. Are lesbians women? Worries about Monique Wittig. Hypatia 11 (2): 94–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, Cressida J. 2003. Feminist solidarity after queer theory: The case of transgender. Signs 28 (4): 1093–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, Patrick. 1998. Gender treachery: Homophobia, masculinity, and threatened identities. In Race, class, gender, and sexuality: The big questions, ed. Zack, N., Shrage, L., and Sartwell, C.Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 168–86.Google Scholar
Kessler, Suzanne J., and McKenna, Wendy. 1985. Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kimmel, Michael. 1994. Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame, and violence in the construction of gender identity. In Theorizing masculinities, ed. Brod, H. and Kaufman, M.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications, pp. 213–19.Google Scholar
Morrison, Edward R., Gralewski, Lisa, Campbell, Neill, and Penton‐Voaka, Ian S. 2007. Facial movement varies by sex and is related to attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior 28:186–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namaste, Viviane K. 2000. Genderbashing: Sexuality, gender, and the regulation of public space. In Invisible lives: The erasure of transsexual and transgendered people. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Overall, Christine. 2007. Public toilets: Sex segregation revisited. Ethics and the Environment 12 (2): 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridgeway, C.L., and Correll, S.J. 2004. Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender and Society 18 (4): 510–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risman, Barbara J. 2004. Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender and Society 18 (4): 429–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serano, Julia. 2007. Whipping girl: A transsexual woman on sexism and the scapegoating of femininity. Emeryville, Calif.: Seal Press.Google Scholar
Spence, Janet T. 1985. Gender identity and its implications for the concepts of masculinity and femininity. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 32:59–95.Google Scholar
Spence, Janet T. 1993. Gender‐related traits and gender ideology—evidence for a multifactorial theory. Journal of personality and social psychology 64 (4): 624–35.Google ScholarPubMed
Stefano, Christine Di. 1991. Who the heck are we? Theoretical turns against gender. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 12 (2): 86–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinem, Gloria. 1994. Womb envy, testyria, and breast castration anxiety. MS 4 (5): 49–56.Google Scholar
West, Candace, and Zimmerman, Don H. 1987. Doing Gender. Gender & Society 1 (2): 125–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar