Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:53:28.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can Science Be Objective? Longino's Science as Social Knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Sharon L. Crasnow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Science as Social Knowledge, Helen Longino offers a contextual analysis of evidential relevance. She claims that this “contextual empiricism” reconciles the objectivity of science with the claim that science is socially constructed. I argue that while her account does offer key insights into the role that values play in science, her claim that science is nonetheless objective is problematic.

Type
REVIEW ESSAY
Information
Hypatia , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , Summer 1993 , pp. 194 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boyd, Richard. 1984. The current status of scientific realism. In Scientific realism, ed. Leplin, J.Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Greenwood, John. 1990. Two dogmas of neo‐empiricism: The “theory‐informity” of observation and the Quine‐Duhem thesis. Philosophy of science 57: 553–74.10.1086/289579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longino, Helen. 1990. Science as social knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1985. Solidarity or objectivity? In Post‐analytic philosophy, ed. Rajchman, J. and West, C.New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar