¹ Mainstreaming: Feminist Research for Teaching Religious Studies, CTS Resources in Religion, 2 (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1985).Google Scholar

² Schuster, Marilyn R. and Van Dyne, Susan R., eds., Women's Place in the Academy: Transforming the Liberal Arts Curriculum (Totowa, NJ: Rowan & Allanheld, 1985).Google Scholar For a look at some of the ways that feminist research has made an impact on the academy from within, see Farnham, Christie, ed., The Impact of Feminist Research in the Academy (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

³ “Asking for the Future,” The Women's Review of Books 6 (February 1989), 21–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴ “The Hand that Pushes the Rock,” The Women's Review of Books 6 (February 1989), 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵ “Feminist Criticism in the Wilderness,” Critical Inquiry (Winter 1981), reprinted in Showalter, Elaine, ed., The New Feminist Criticism (New York: Pantheon Books, 1985), pp. 243–70.Google Scholar

⁶ In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

⁷ Most Vatican decrees against women's equal access to power in the church are based on theories of complementarity which are based on a binary gender system in which women are said to be either weaker and less human, or, paradoxically, stronger and more spiritual. See my New Catholic Women: A Contemporary Challenge to Traditional Religious Authority (San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1985).Google Scholar For a look at the ways in which “women's superiority” functioned to keep women underpaid and undereducated, see Conway, Jill K., “Politics, Pedagogy, and Gender” in Conway, Jill K., Bourque, Susan C. and Scott, Joan W., eds., Learning About Women (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1989), pp. 137–53.Google Scholar

⁸ Boston: Beacon, 1968.

⁹ Religion and Sexism (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1974);Google Scholar with McLaughlin, Eleanor Como, Women of Spirit (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1979);Google Scholar and with Keller, Rosemary Skinner, Women and Religion in America, 3 vols. (San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1981, 1983, and 1986).Google Scholar

¹⁰ “Placing Women in History: A 1975 Perspective,” originally published in Feminist Studies 3 (1975), 5–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar, revised and published in Carroll, Bernice, ed., Liberating Women's History: Theoretical and Critical Essays (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1976), pp. 357–67.Google Scholar

¹¹ Contemporary Feminist Thought (Boston: G. K. Hall, 1983).Google Scholar

¹² Anson, Peter F., “Papal Enclosure for Nuns,” Cistercian Studies 3 (1968), 109-23, 189–206.Google Scholar

¹³ “Women's Religious Roles in Brazil: A History of Limitations,” Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 1 (1985), 43–57.Google Scholar Myscofski noticed that the difference between women's confessed sins and those of men were highly dependent upon the range of ordinary activity for each gender.

¹⁴ No theorist of gender can avoid Freud; even those who do not cite his work explicitly are shaped by it in some way. For an introduction to his work in this area see “Female Sexuality” (1931) in Rieff, Philip, ed., Sexuality and the Psychology of Love (New York: Collier, 1963), pp. 194–211.Google Scholar

¹⁵ See, e.g., Chodorow, Nancy, The Reproducfion of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978).Google Scholar

¹⁶ For an illuminating appropriation of Freud by feminist critics, see Gilbert, Sandra and Gubar, Susan, No Man's Land: The War of the Words (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1988), pp. 165–227.Google Scholar

¹⁷ “The Traffic in Women: Notes on the ‘Political Economy’ of Sex,” in Reiter, Rayna R., ed., Towards an Anthropology of Women (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1975), pp. 157–210.Google Scholar

¹⁸ “Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence,” Signs 5 (1980), 631–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁹ See, e.g., Gender and Religion: On the Complexity of Symbols (Boston: Beacon, 1986)Google Scholar, and her brilliant analysis of gender in Jesus as Mother: Studies in the Spirituality of the High Middle Ages (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982).Google Scholar

²⁰ Campbell has published numerous articles on heretofore obscure women like Maisie Ward, female evangelists in the 1930s and 1940s, and other important, but neglected figures. See, e.g., “The Catholic Earth Mother: Dorothy Day and Women's Power in the Church,” Cross Currents 34 (1984), 270–82;Google Scholar“Part Time Female Evangelists of the Thirties and Forties: The Rosary College Catholic Evidence Guild,” U. S. Catholic Historian 5 (1986), 371–84;Google Scholar“Gleanings of a Laywoman's Ministry: Maisie Ward as Preacher, Publisher and Social Activist,” The Month 258 (1987), 313–17;Google Scholar or “The Theology of the Mother-hearted God: Hannah Whitall Smith (1832-1911),” Signs (forthcoming, Fall 1989).

²¹ Holy Feast and Holy Fast: The Religious Significance of Food to Medieval Women (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987), p. 299.Google Scholar

²² Sister of Wisdom: St. Hildegard's Theology of the Feminine (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987).Google Scholar

²³ Trible, Phyllis, God and the Rhetoric of Sexuality (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1981);Google ScholarFiorenza, Elisabeth Schüssler, In Memory of Her: A Feminist Theological Reconstruction of Christian Origins (New York: Crossroad, 1984).Google Scholar

²⁴ Boston: Beacon, 1987.

²⁵ Philadelphia: Fortress, 1987.

²⁶ “A Symbiotic Relationship,” The Women's Review of Books 6 (February 1989), 16.Google Scholar

²⁷ “Ambiguities in Identity Transformation: From Sugar and Spice to Professor,” Notre Dame Journal of Education 2 (1972), 338–47.Google Scholar