Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T01:10:14.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Whitehead's Use of Imagination in His Conception of God

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2014

Jane Kopas
Jane Kopas*
Affiliation:
University of Scranton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For most readers the conceptual elements of Whitehead's doctrine of God stand out more than the imaginative elements. If we take a more careful look at his understanding of the role of imagination in various realms and at his choice of particular images to illustrate his view of God, however, we can appreciate better the primary concerns that underlie his reformulation. We also find a consistency of purpose in relating images to his philosophical system and a richness that otherwise goes unnoticed. The shortcomings in his use of imagination result from a neglect of certain aspects of experience.

Type
Articles
Information
Horizons , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , Spring 1986 , pp. 7 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © The College Theology Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Whitehead, Alfred North, Process and Reality, corrected edition, edited by Griffin, David Ray and Sherburne, Donald (New York: Free Press, 1978), p. 7.Google Scholar Hereafter this work will be referred to as PR.

2 Tracy, David, The Analogical Imagination (New York: Crossroad, 1981), p, 451.Google Scholar

3 Ibid., p. 408.

4 PR, p. v.

5 See Christian's, WilliamInterpreting Whitehead's Metaphysics (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1959), pp. 292–94 for a discussion of the exceptions.Google Scholar

6 PR, pp. 25-26.

7 Ibid., pp. 374, 412.

8 Whitehead, Alfred North, Modes of Thought (New York: Free Press, 1968), pp. 49-50, 174.Google Scholar Hereafter this work will be referred to as MT.

9 Whitehead, Alfred North, Adventures of Ideas (New York: Free Press, 1967), pp. 120, 163–64.Google Scholar Hereafter this work will be referred to as AI.

10 PR, p. 495.

11 Kuhn, Thomas, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971).Google Scholar

12 PR, p. 7.

13 Whitehead, Alfred North, Science and the Modern World (New York: Free Press, 1967), pp. 1–2.Google Scholar Hereafter this work will be referred to as SMW.

14 Ibid., p. 208.

15 AI, p. 49.

16 Ibid., pp. 69-70.

17 Ibid., p. 296.

18 PR, p. 23.

19 Whitehead, Alfred North, Religion in the Making (New York: World, 1969), p. 17Google Scholar, hereafter referred to as RM; PR, p. 24; SMW, p. 192.

20 Wilner, Eleanor, Gathering the Winds: Visionary Imagination and Radical Transformation of Self and Society (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975), p. 1.Google Scholar

21 Williams, Daniel Day, “Deity, Monarchy, and Metaphysics; Whitehead's Critique of the Theological Tradition,” in The Relevance of Whitehead, ed. Leclerc, Ivor (London: Allen and Unwin, 1961), 353–72.Google Scholar

22 PR, p. 520; MT, p. 49.

23 AI, p. 166.

24 Ibid., p. 169; SMW, p. 173.

25 PR, pp. 343-44.

26 AI, p. 167.

27 Lowe, Victor, “Alfred North Whitehead: A Biographical Perspective,” Process Studies 12/3 (Fall 1982), 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Lowe observes that Whitehead moved from agnosticism before the First World War to a rediscovery after the war of a God who was not a personal creator but rather a Harmony that beckoned and preserved (pp. 143-44).

28 Emmett, Dorothy, Whitehead's Philosophy of Organism (London: Macmillan, 1966), p. 268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

29 SMW, p. 192; AI, p. 67; RM, p. 73; AI, p. 286.

30 See Crownfield, Frederick, “Whitehead's References to the Bible,” Process Studies 6/4 (Winter 1978), 270–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Whitehead's manner of incorporating biblical references is by allusion rather than citation. The closest he comes to expressing a principle of selectivity occurs in Religion in the Making where he observes that the writings of John rather than Paul set forth the most desirable basis for religious motivation.

31 RM, pp. 16, 40.

32 Kuntz, Paul, Alfred North Whitehead (Boston: Twayne, 1984), p. 133.Google Scholar Unfortunately, Kuntz's interpretation simply states the place of order in the movement through these images, neglecting the existential and religious gravity of the movement itself.

33 Frankenberry, Nancy, “The Empirical Dimension of Religious Experience,” Process Studies 8/4 (Winter 1978), 273–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34 RM, p. 40.

35 SMW, p. 173.

36 RM, p. 148.

37 PR, p. 532.

38 Emmett, , Whitehead's Philosophy of Organism, p. 271.Google Scholar

39 PR, p. 23.

40 PR, p. 532.

41 Lundeen, Lyman, Risk and Rhetoric in Religion: Whitehead's Theory of Language and the Discourse of Faith (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1972), p. 223.Google Scholar

42 RM, p. 148.

43 Emmett, , Whitehead's Philosophy of Organism, p. 253.Google Scholar

44 PR, p. 532.

45 AI, pp. 284, 296.

46 AI, pp. 252, 264.

47 “The Leaden Echo and the Golden Echo,” in Poems of Gerard Manley Hopkins, ed. Bridges, Robert and Gardner, W. H., 3rd ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1948), p. 96.Google Scholar

48 RM, pp. 54-55.