Article contents
Reflections of an Unrepentant Feminist with Pluralistic Tendencies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 September 2014
Abstract
- Type
- Editorial Symposium
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The College Theology Society 1989
References
1 Ruether, Rosemary Radford, “The Future of Feminist Theology in the Academy,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 53/4 (December 1985), 703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Lloyd, Genevieve, The Man of Reason; “Male” and “Female” in Western Philosophy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984), p. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Keller, Evelyn Fox, Reflections on Gender and Science (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1985), p. 7.Google Scholar
4 Tracy, David, The Analogical Imagination (New York: Crossroad, 1981).Google Scholar
5 Ibid., p. 67.
6 Ruether, p. 704.
7 Fiorenza, Elisabeth Schüssler, Bread not Stone: The Challenge of Feminist Biblical Interpretation (Boston: Beacon, 1984), p. xiii.Google Scholar
8 Tracy, p. 108.
9 Ruether, p. 710.
10 Ibid., p. 704.
11 Fiorenza, , Bread not Stone, p. 3.Google Scholar
12 Tracy, p. 31.
13 Ibid., pp. 248-75.
14 Fiorenza, Francis Schüssler, Foundational Theology: Jesus and the Church (New York: Crossroad, 1984).Google Scholar
15 Ricoeur, Paul, Time and Narrative (3 vols.; Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984–1988).Google Scholar
16 These expressions are taken from the work of Reinholt Kosseleck. For the full discussion see Ricoeur, , Time and Narrative, 3: pp. 208–16.Google Scholar
17 Ibid., p. 220.
18 Ibid.
19 Ricoeur, , Time and Narrative, 1: 75.Google Scholar
20 Ricoeur, , The Rule of Metaphor (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1978), p. 313.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by