Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T08:49:46.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Implications of Rahner's Anthropology for Fundamental Moral Theology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2014

Ronald Modras
Ronald Modras*
Affiliation:
Saint Louis University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Karl Rahner's primary contribution to moral theology lies in his development of an anthropology able to serve as a foundation for a rehabilitated concept of natural law. Human persons in Rahner's theology are characterized by certain existentials with logical consequences for ethics. From human transcendence and freedom follows the concept of a fundamental option for or against God. From human materiality, historicity, guilt, and individuality follow the methodological necessity of distinguishing between principles and prescriptions and the unavoidable need to take risks. In contrast to unchanging metaphysical human nature, the historicity of concrete human nature and therefore of natural law requires that all material norms be recognized as conditioned by history and culture and hence limited, not universal or absolute.

Type
Articles
Information
Horizons , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , Spring 1985 , pp. 70 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © The College Theology Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “Pluralism in Theology,” Theological Investigations, henceforth TI (20 vols. London: Darton, Longman, and Todd, 1961–1976;Google Scholar New York: Seabury, 1974-81) 11:3-23. See also “Some Clarifying Remarks,” TI 17:243–48.Google Scholar

2 Spirit in the World, tr. Dych, W. V., from the 2nd German edition (New York: Herder and Herder, 1968).Google Scholar

3 Ibid., p. 61.

4 des Wortes, Hörer, Zur Grundlegung einer Religionsphilosophie, ed. Metz, J. B. (Munich: Kösel, 1963), p. 91.Google Scholar The M. Richards translation, Hearers of the Word (New York: Herder and Herder, 1969)Google Scholar is open to criticism for serious inadequacies. An alternative translation of certain key chapters is to be found in A Rahner Reader, ed. McCool, Gerald (New York: Seabury, 1975), p. 24.Google Scholar

5 Foundations of Christian Faith: An Introduction to the Idea of Christianity, tr. Dych, W. V. (New York: Seabury, 1978), pp. 21-22, 32-33, 48.Google Scholar

6 Ibid., pp. 34-46. See also “Theology of Freedom,” TI 6:184.Google Scholar

7 Hörer, pp. 117-35; Hearers, pp. 94-108.

8 “Theology of Freedom,” TI 6:180.Google Scholar

9 Hörer, pp. 15-30; Hearers, pp. 3-15; Rahner Reader, pp. 20-21.

10 “Reflections on the Unity of the Love of Neighbor and the Love of God,” TI 6:231–49.Google Scholar See also “Christian Humanism,” TI 9:188.

11 “The Body in the Order of Salvation,” TI 17:78.

12 Spirit, pp. 249, 324.

13 Hominization; The Evolutionary Origin of Man as a Theological Problem (New York: Herder and Herder, 1965), p. 23.Google Scholar

14 “Some Thoughts on ‘Good Intention’,” TI 3:113.

15 “The Theological Concept of Concupiscentia,” TI 1:347-82.

16 “The Unity of Spirit and Matter in the Christian Understanding of Faith,” TI 6:171.

17 “Theology and Anthropology,” TI 9:35, 43.

18 Hörer, pp. 36, 161-72; Hearers, pp. 21, 130-39.

19 Hominization, pp. 18-19; “Unity,” TI 6:174-77.

20 “The Historicity of Theology,” TI 9:69.

21 “The Experiment with Man,” TI 9:205-24. Rahner's own wrestling with the implications of the question is evinced by comparing this article with “The Problem of Genetic Manipulation,” TI 9:225-52.

22 Hörer, p. 198; Hearers, p. 160.

23 Foundations, pp. 91-104. See also “Guilt and Its Remission,” TI 2:265-81; “Guilt—Responsibility—Punishment within the View of Catholic Theology,” TI 6:197-230.

24 Ibid., p. 93.

25 “On the Question of a Formal Existential Ethics,” TI 2:219-29.

26 The Dynamic Element in the Church (London: Burns & Oates, 1964), pp. 84–170.Google Scholar

27 “On the Theological Problems Entailed in a ‘Pastoral Constitution’,” TI 10:293-317.

28 “The Dignity and Freedom of Man,” TI 2:254.

29 Dynamic Element, p. 16.

30 “Zur ‘Situationsethik’ aus Ökumenischer Sicht,” Schriften zur Theologie (Einsiedeln: Benziger, 1965) 6:539.Google Scholar An English translation of the article can be found in The Christian of the Future (New York: Herder and Herder, 1967), pp. 39–48.Google Scholar

31 “On the Encyclical ‘Humanae Vitae’,” TI 11:263-87.

32 “Dignity,” TI 2:237. See also Leo O'Donovan, J., “Orthopraxis and Theological Method in Karl Rahner,” CTSA Proceedings 35 (1980), 48–52;Google ScholarCarr, Anne, The Theological Method of Karl Rahner (Missoula, MT: Scholars Press, 1977), pp. 241–44.Google Scholar

33 “The Prospects for Dogmatic Theology,” TI 1:14-16; “Dogmatik” in Lexikon für Theologie und Kirche (2nd ed.; Freiburg: Herder, 1959), 3:447.Google Scholar

34 “A Scheme for a Treatise of Dogmatic Theology,” TI 1:19-37.

35 Hominization, p. 109. Cardinal Karol Wojtyla similarly criticized such simplification as “bad for anthropology and even worse for ethics.” See Modras, R., “Birth Control, Personalism, and the Pope,” Currents in Theology and Mission 8 (1981), 283–90.Google Scholar

36 “Über schlechte Argumentation in der Moraltheologie,” Schriften 13: 93–107.Google Scholar

37 Röper, Anita, Objektive und Subjektive Moral: Ein Gerpäch mit Karl Rahner (Freiburg: Herder, 1971).Google Scholar

38 “Der mündiger Christ,” Schriften 15:119–32.Google Scholar For a digest of the article in English, see Theology Digest 31 (1984), 123–26.Google Scholar

39 See Bresnahan, James F., “An Ethics of Faith” in A World of Grace, ed. O'Donovan, Leo J. (New York: Crossroad, 1981), pp. 171–73.Google Scholar

40 See O'Connell, Timothy, Principles for a Catholic Morality (New York: Seabury, 1976), p. 216.Google Scholar

41 Ibid., pp. 58-82.

42 O'Donovan's translation of Restbegriff as “analytic concept” is surely preferable to the commonly used literal translation “remainder concept” (“Orthopraxis,” p. 58, n. 43).

43 “Nature and Grace,” TI 4:165-88.

44 Foundations, pp. 408-09.

45 “Changeable and Unchangeable Factors in the Church,” TI 14:14.

46 James F. Bresnahan aptly describes this self-criticism as an aspect of “pilgrim ethics” in “Rahner's Ethics: Critical Natural Law in Relation to Contemporary Ethical Methodology,” Journal of Religion 56 (1976), 36–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

47 Fuchs, Josef, Natural Law: A Theological Investigation (Dublin: Gill, 1965), p. 91.Google Scholar

48 See Demmer, Klaus, Sein und Gebot (Munich: Ferdinand Schöningh, 1971), pp. 94–110.Google Scholar

49 Crowe, Michael B., “The Pursuit of the Natural Law,” Irish Theological Quarterly 44 (1977), 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar