Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:43:20.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

III. Pastor Aeternus, Liberalism, and the Limits of Papal Authority

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2020

Christian D. Washburn
Christian D. Washburn*
Affiliation:
The St. Paul Seminary School of Divinity—The University of St. Thomas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Two dogmatic constitutions from the First Vatican Council, Dei Filius and Pastor Aeternus, are worth revisiting today. These documents were in part a response to the challenge of liberalism. Although such a retrieval of the wisdom of Dei Filius and Pastor Aeternus is necessary as a means of protecting Christ's revelation, this is not sufficient. The doctrine of Pastor Aeternus should also be developed to make more clear the limits of papal authority.

Type
Theological Roundtable
Information
Horizons , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , June 2020 , pp. 119 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © College Theology Society, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

23 See McPhee, Peter, The French Revolution, 1789–1799 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), 199Google Scholar.

24 Newman, John Henry, Apologia Pro Vita Sua: Being a Reply to a Pamphlet Entitled “What, Then, Does Dr. Newman Mean?” (London: Longman, Green, Longman, Roberts, and Green, 1864), 329Google Scholar.

25 See Hünermann, Peter, Hoping, Helmut, Fastiggi, Robert L., Nash, Anne Englund, and Denzinger, Heinrich, eds., Compendium of Creeds, Definitions, and Declarations on Matters of Faith and Morals, 43rd ed. [hereafter HD] (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2012), 2730–32Google Scholar, 2890–96, 2901–80.

26 See Klaus Schatz, Vaticanum I, 1869–1870, vol. 1 (Paderborn: F. Schöningh, 1992), 93.

27 See Granderath, Theodore SJ, Geschichte des Vatikanischen konzils von seiner ersten ankündigung bis zu seiner vertagung (Freiburg i.Br.: Herder Verlag GmbH, 1903), 1:431–33Google Scholar. Collectio Lacensis. Acta et decreta sacrorum conciliorum recentiorum usque ad annum 1870, eds. G. Schneemann, SJ, and T. Granderath, SJ, vol. 7 (Freiburg i.Br.: Herder Verlag GmbH 1870–1892), 505.

28 HD, 3004.

29 HD, 3005.

30 HD, 3006.

31 HD, 3007.

32 HD, 3020.

33 HD, 3020. Subsequent magisterial interventions were equally clear that the meaning of an infallible doctrine is irreformable. In the midst of the modernist crisis, St. Pius X required an oath to be taken by all clergy, pastors, confessors, preachers, religious superiors, and professors in philosophical-theological seminaries, which included: “I entirely reject the heretical misrepresentation that dogmas evolve and change from one meaning to another different from the one which the Church held previously.” HD, 3541.

34 HD, 3020.

35 HD, 3043.

36 See HD, 3074.

37 HD, 3055, 3058.

38 See HD, 3074.

39 Minnich, Nelson H., The Decrees of the Fifth Lateran Council (1512–17): Their Legitimacy, Origins, Contents, and Implementation, vol. 3 (Florence: Routledge, 2018), 13CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

40 HD, 3070.

41 See le Page Renouf, Peter, The Condemnation of Pope Honorius (London: Longmans, Green, 1868)Google Scholar; Renouf, The Case of Pope Honorius Reconsidered with Reference to Recent Apologies (London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer, 1869); and von Döllinger, Ignaz, Huber, Johann Nepomuk, and Friedrich, Johannes, Der Papst und das Concil Eine weiter ausgeführte und mit dem Quellennachweis versehene Neubearbeitung der in der Augsburger allgemeinen Zeitung erschienenen Artikel. Das Concil und die Civiltà (Leipzig: E. F. Steinacker, 1869)Google Scholar.

42 (Hefele) Mansi, Collectio Conciliorum Recentiorum (Arnhem, Holland, 1927), 52: col. 83. Hefele also published a pamphlet on Honorius: von Hefele, Carl Joseph, [Causa Honorii Papae.] Honorius und das sechste allgemeine Concil … Autorisirte Übersetzung. Mit einem Nachtrag der Verfassers (Tübingen: Verlag der H. Laupp'schen Buchhandlung, 1870)Google Scholar. (Verot) Mansi, Collectio Conciliorum Recentiorum (Arnhem, Holland, 1927), 52: col. 295–300.

43 Mansi, Collectio Conciliorum Recentiorum (Arnhem, Holland, 1927), 52: col. 926.

44 “Ex his apparet doctrinam quae habetur in schemate non esse illam Alberti Pighii, seu extremam cuiusdam scholae, sed illam unam eandemque quam Bellarminus in loco a reverendissimo oratore citato docet, quarto loco adducit, et quam vocat certissimam et asserendam, vel potius semetipsum retractando, sententiam communissimam et certam.” Mansi, Collectio Conciliorum Recentiorum (Arnhem, Holland, 1927), 52: col. 1218.

45 Bellarmine, Robert, Disputationes Roberti Bellarmini Politiani Societatis Jesu, de Controversiis Christianae Fidei, adversus huius temporis Haereticos (Paris: Triadelphorum, 1613)Google Scholar, 3.4.2, vol. 1: col. 794.

46 Washburn, Christian D., “Papal Infallibility, Vatican I, and Three 16th Century Views,” Annuarium Historiae Conciliorum 44 (2012): 143–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47 Gratian, Concordantia discordantium canonum, in Amilius Friedberg, Corpus iuris canonici (Graz: Akademische Druck- u. Verlagsanstalt, 1955), Decretum, part 1, distinction 40, chapter 6, 1:146. English translation by James M. Moynihan, Papal Immunity and Liability in the Writings of the Medieval Canonists (Rome: Gregorian Biblical Bookshop, 1961), 26.

48 St. Thomas Aquinas, Quodlibet, 9.16.

49 Hervaeus Natalis, OP, De potestate papae, in In quatuor libros Sententiarum commentaria. Quibus adiectus est eiusdem auctoris tractatus De potestate Papae (1647; reprint, Farnborough: Gregg, 1966), 365; de Palude, Petrus OP, Tractatus de Potestate Papae, ed. Stella, P. T. (Zürich: Pas-Verlag, 1966), 191Google Scholar; Guido Terreni, Quaestio de magisterio infallibili romani pontificis, ed. Bartolomé María Xiberta y Roqueta (Monasterii: typis Aschendorff, 1926), 16, 25; de Torquemada, Juan OP, Summa de ecclesia contra impugnatores potestatis summi pontificis et LXXIII quaestiones super potestate et auctoritate Papali ex sententiis sancti Thomae Aquinatis (Lyons: Per Magistrus Johannem Trechsel, 1496)Google Scholar, l. 2, c. 112; de Torquemada, Juan OP, De inerrantia romani pontificis ex cathedra definientis suffragium praeclarissimi Card. Jo. Turrecremata O. PP. legati pontificii ad concilium Basileense deinde ad concilium florentinum latinorum oratoris ex aureo illius opere summa de potestate papali depromptum et Rev. patribus concilii Vaticani exhibitum (Taurini: P. H. F. Marietti, 1870)Google Scholar; St. Antoninus, OP, Summa theologica (Graz: Akademische Drucku. Verlagsanstalt, 1959), 3: cols. 364–65.

50 Moynihan, Papal Immunity and Liability in the Writings of the Medieval Canonists, 141–42; Tierney, Brian, Foundations of the Conciliar Theory: The Contribution of the Medieval Canonists from Gratian to the Great Schism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 9Google Scholar.

51 “In tantum mihi fides necessaria est, ut cum de caeteris peccatis solum Deum judicem habeam, propter solum peccatum, quod in fide committitur, possem ab ecclesia judicari. Nam qui non credit, jam judicatus est.” Innocent III, Sermo II in consecratione pontificis maximi, PL 217, col. 656.

52 Christian D. Washburn, “Three 16th Century Thomist Solutions to the Problem of a Heretical Pope: Cajetan, Cano, and Bellarmine,” forthcoming.

53 Bellarmine, Disputationes Roberti Bellarmini Politiani Societatis Jesu, de Controversiis Christianae Fidei, adversus huius temporis Haereticos, 3.4.6, vol. 1, 805.

54 “Est ergo QUINTA opinio vera; Papam haereticum manifestum, per se desinere esse Papam & caput; sicut per se desinit esse Christianus & membrum corporis Ecclesiae: quare ab Ecclesia posse eum iudicari & puniri.” Bellarmine, Disputationes Roberti Bellarmini Politiani Societatis Jesu, de Controversiis Christianae Fidei, adversus huius temporis Haereticos, 3.2.30, vol. 1, 694.

55 Bellarmine, Disputationes Roberti Bellarmini Politiani Societatis Jesu, de Controversiis Christianae Fidei, adversus huius temporis Haereticos, 3.2.30, vol. 1, 691.

56 Bellarmine, Disputationes Roberti Bellarmini Politiani Societatis Jesu, de Controversiis Christianae Fidei, adversus huius temporis Haereticos, 3.2.30, vol. 1, 691.

57 Jedin, Hubert, Studien über die schriftstellertätigkeit Albert Pigges (Münster in Westfalen: Aschendorff, 1931), 136Google Scholar.