No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 September 2014
1 Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World, n. 62, in The Documents of Vatican II, ed. Abbott, Walter M. (London: Chapman, 1967), p. 270.Google Scholar
2 Quod.III, q.IV, a.1 ad 3; see IV Sent., d.19, q.II, a.II, qa.2 ad 4 for a different formulation.
3 See, e.g., Dulles, Avery, “The Two Magisteria: An Interim Reflection,” Proceedings of the Catholic Theological Society of America 35 (1980), 155–69.Google Scholar
4 Summa Theologiae, Ia-IIae, q.98, a.1c.
5 I prescind in this short essay from any consideration of either the theoretical underpinnings or the theological meaning of the concept of infallibility in the Catholic tradition.
6 Sacramentum Mundi (New York: Herder and Herder, 1969), 3:356.Google Scholar
7 See Rahner, Karl, “The Dispute Concerning the Church's Teaching Office,” Theological Investigations, 14 (New York: Seabury, 1976), 85–88.Google Scholar
8 Dogmatic Constitution on the Church, n. 62, in The Documents of Vatican II, ed. Abbott, , p. 48.Google Scholar
9 See Fogarty, Gerald P., “Dissent at Catholic University: The Case of Henry Poels,” America, October 11, 1986, pp. 180–84.Google Scholar
10 “Authority and Conscience: Two Needed Voices in the Church,” Church 2/3 (Fall 1986), 15.Google Scholar