No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A Discipline in Quest of an Identity: Religious Education
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 September 2014
Abstract
If religious education is to have a proper place in seminary, college and university curricula, it needs to acquire a clear identity as an academic discipline. A course must be developed which deals with foundations of religious education, its history and philosophy. Its relationship with theology and moral education demands special treatment.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The College Theology Society 1976
References
1 Radtke, B. A., “The State of Catechetics in U.S. Catholic Seminaries,” in The Living Light 12 (Fall, 1975), pp. 373–391Google Scholar.
2 Holbrook, C. A., Religion: A Humanistic Field (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1963), p. 39Google Scholar.
3 Quoted in Holbrook, Religion: A Humanistic Field, pp. ix–x. Princeton's Council of the Humanities commissioned two works to examine the possibilities for the development of religion as a field scholarly inquiry within the university context. Holbrook's work was one; the other, edited by Ramsey, Paul was, Religion (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1965)Google Scholar.
4 Walton, J. and Kuethe, J. L. (eds.), The Discipline of Education (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1963), p. 5Google Scholar.
5 Cf. Walton, and Kuethe, , Discipline of Education, p. 17Google Scholar. These are the words of R. S. Peters, a respondent to Walton's paper. Lee, J. M. seems to be of the same mind, cf. The Shape of Religious Instruction (Dayton: Pflaum), pp. 94–99Google Scholar.
6 Cf. Religious Education 62 (Sept.-Oct, 1967), pp. 387–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 Ibid., p. 392.
8 Henderlite, R., “Elements of Unpredictability Which Create Difficulties in a Precise Definition of Christian Education,” in Religion Education 62 (1967), p. 405CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9 Religious Education 67 (MarchApril, 1972), pp. 83–97Google Scholar.
10 (New York: New York University Press, 1968), p. v.
11 Cruz, A. Etchegaray, Historia de la catechesis (Santiago, Chile: Ediciones Paulines, 1962)Google Scholar.
12 Religious Education 67 (1972), p. 91Google Scholar.
13 “Hopefor the Profession,” in Religious Education 67 (Sept.-Oct, 1972), p. 39Google Scholar. Cf. also Melchert's, “Theory in Religious Education,” in Taylor, M. J. (ed.), Foundations for Christian Education in an Era of Change (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1976), pp. 20–29Google Scholar.
14 Nelson, C. Ellis, “Is Church Education Something in Particular?” in Religious Education 67 (Jan.-Feb., 1972), p. 8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
15 (New York: Herder and Herder, 1966), pp. 50-51, 53.
16 The Flow of Religious Instruction (Dayton: Pflaum, 1973), p. 5Google Scholar.
17 Westerhoff, J. H. and Neville, G. K., Generation to Generation (Philadelphia: Pilgrim Press, 1974), p. 41Google Scholar.
18 In a recent article Sara Little uses a different breakdown. She distinguishes five possible alternative relationships between theology and education: (1) theology as content to be taught, (2) theology as norm, (3) theology as irrelevant, (4) “doing” theology as educating, and (5) education in dialogue with theology. Cf. “Theology and Religious Education,” in Taylor, M. J. (ed.), Foundations for Christian Education in an Era of Change, pp. 31–33Google Scholar.
19 “Faith, Theology and Belief,” in Commonweal (November 15, 1974), p. 135Google Scholar.
20 Monograph No. 8: Theology as a Source in Shaping the Church's Educational Work (Nashville: United Methodist Board of Discipleship, 1974), p. 12Google Scholar.
21 “Christian Education as a Theological Discipline and Method,” in Religious Education 48 (Nov.-Dec., 1953), pp. 409–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
22 Marthaler, B. L., “Catechesis and Theology,” in Proceedings of the Catholic Theological Society of America 28 (1973), pp. 261–270Google Scholar.
23 Cf. The Living Light 10 (Fall, 1973), pp. 327–339Google Scholar.
24 Quoted by Nieman, J., “Is Religious Education a Profession?” in Religious Education 67 (Sept.-Oct., 1972), pp. 363–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar.