No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 September 2014
The episcopal silence and secrecy associated with the recent pedophilia scandal echoes a larger inability of the Catholic episcopal hierarchy to enter into open and honest dialogue about a wide range of sexual issues. For more than three decades the chasm between official teachings on sexuality and gender and the belief and/or practice of the majority of Catholic laity, clergy and theologians (and an unknown number of bishops) has been growing. Still, attempts to address or bridge this divide have met with a fourfold silence. It is a silence that has kept bishops from speaking their true minds, a silence sought by restricting, investigating and sanctioning theologians, a silence that renders pastors mute or covert on sexual matters, and a silence that ignores the experience and voices of women. Such a silence undermines magisterial authority and deprives Catholics of a useful and persuasive sexual ethic, while marginalizing those willing to speak out and demoralizing those who feel they cannot.
1 Greeley, Andrew, The Catholic Myth: The Behavior and Beliefs of American Catholics (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1990), 199–200.Google Scholar
2 Dillon, Sam, “Role of Bishops is Now a Focus of Grand Juries,” The New York Times, 12 July 2002, p. A1.Google Scholar
3 Steinfels, Peter, “The Church's Sex-Abuse Crisis: The Story Behind the Stories,” Commonweal, 19 April 2002, pp. 13–19.Google Scholar Steinfels notes that while the bishops have done a great deal since 1993, they waited too long to act and did not do enough. Patrick J. Schiltz, an attorney in more than five hundred sex abuse cases involving every major Christian denomination, reports on the part legal action and press coverage have had in magnifying the scandal, calling the media irresponsible in rerunning stories to which they had given full coverage decades before. He especially faults the press for failure to indicate how small the actual number of sex abuse cases has been since the early 1990s. “Not All the News is Fit to Print. What the Media Missed in the Sex-Abuse Scandal,” Commonweal, 15 August, 2003, pp. 14–17.
4 Patrick, Anne E., Liberating Conscience: Feminist Explorations in Catholic Moral Theology (New York: Continuum, 1996), 17.Google Scholar
5 Curran, Charles E., Tensions in Moral Theology (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988), 74.Google Scholar
6 D'Antonio, William V., “Trends in U.S. Roman Catholic Attitudes, Beliefs, Behavior,” National Catholic Reporter, 29 October 1999, p. 14Google Scholar; Greeley, Andrew M., Catholic, American Catholics Since the Council: An Unauthorized Report (Chicago, IL: Thomas More Press, 1985), 87.Google Scholar
7 Greeley, , American Catholics Since the Council, 81–87.Google Scholar
8 D'Antonio, , “The American Catholic Laity in 1999,” National Catholic Reporter, 29 October 1999, p. 12.Google Scholar See also Curran, , Tensions in Moral Theology, 74–75.Google Scholar
9 D'Antonio, , “Trends in U.S. Roman Catholic Attitudes, Beliefs, Behavior,” p. 14.Google Scholar
10 D'Antonio, William V. et al. , Laity, American and Catholics: Transforming the Church (Kansas City, MO: Sheed and Ward, 1996), 27, 49–63Google Scholar; D'Antonio, , “American Catholic Laity,” p. 12 (Table 3)Google Scholar; Greeley, , American Catholics Since the Council, 81–87Google Scholar; McCormick, Richard A., The Critical Calling: Reflections on Moral Dilemmas Since Vatican II (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1989), 273–74.Google Scholar
11 John-Stevas, Norman St., The Agonizing Choice: Birth Control, Religion and the Law (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1971), 187.Google Scholar
12 Greeley, , American Catholics Since the Council, 84.Google Scholar
13 Ostling, Richard N., “Study Cites Evidence of Gay Culture in Church,” Columbian, 18 August 2002, p. A8.Google Scholar
14 Greeley, , American Catholics Since the Council, 90.Google Scholar
15 Ibid., 114; D'Antonio, et al. , Laity, American and Catholic, 52–54.Google Scholar
16 National Conference of Catholic Bishops, “Reflections on the Morale of Priests,” Origins, 12 January 1989, p. 501.Google Scholar
17 McCormick, , The Critical Calling, 128.Google Scholar
18 Ibid, 116; Curran, , Tensions in Moral Theology, 75.Google Scholar
19 See, e.g., Kosnik, Anthony et al. , Human Sexuality: New Directions in American Catholic Thought: A Study Commissioned by the Catholic Theological Society of America (New York: Paulist, 1977)Google Scholar, or Curran, Charles E. and McCormick, Richard A., eds., Dialogue About Catholic Sexual Teaching: Readings in Moral Theology No. 8 (New York: Paulist, 1993).Google Scholar
20 McCormick, , The Critical Calling, 112–13Google Scholar; Curran, , Tensions in Moral Theology, 26, 59.Google Scholar
21 McCormick, , The Critical Calling, 25Google Scholar; McCormick, Richard A. and McBrien, Richard P., “LAffaire Curran II,” America, 15 September 1990, p. 130.Google Scholar
22 Greeley, , The Catholic Myth, 91.Google Scholar
23 D'Antonio, et al. , Laity, American and Catholic, 15.Google Scholar
24 Greeley, , American Catholics Since the Council, 83–85Google Scholar; McCormick, , The Critical Calling, 273–75.Google Scholar
25 D'Antonio, et al. , Laity, , American and Catholic, 44–45.Google Scholar
26 McCormick, , The Critical Calling, 281–85Google Scholar; Patrick, , Liberating Conscience, 45–48.Google Scholar
27 Krier Mich, Marvin L., Catholic Social Teaching and Movements (Mystic, CT: Twenty-Third Publications, 1998), 357–370.Google Scholar
28 McCormick, , The Critical Calling, 75.Google Scholar
29 McCormick, Richard A. and McBrien, Richard P., “Theology as Public Responsibility,” America, 28 September 1991, p. 187.Google Scholar
30 Greeley, , The Catholic Myth, 91.Google Scholar
31 Untener, Kenneth E., “What a Prophet Does and Does Not Do,” Origins, 23 May 1991, p. 38.Google Scholar
32 Untener, Kenneth E., “Humanae Vitae: What Has it Done to Us?” Commonweal, 18 June 1993, p. 14.Google Scholar See also “Human Sexuality Document's Birth Control Section,” Origins, 29 November 1990, pp. 404–05.
33 Untener, , “Humanae Vitae,” p. 13.Google Scholar
34 Clark, Matthew, “The Pastoral Exercise of Authority,” New Theology Review, 10/3 (1997): 10.Google Scholar
35 Steinfels, Peter, “Bishops Protest Vatican Advisory Condoning Anti-Homosexual Bias,” The New York Times, 2 November 1992, p. B11.Google Scholar
36 Kenny, Michael H., “Women's Ordination–Uneasy Questions,” America, 30 July 1994, p. 16Google Scholar; Weakland, Rembert G., “A Bishop Responds,” Commonweal, 17 June 1994, p. 5.Google Scholar
37 Paul, John II, “To Defend the Faith,” Origins, 16 July 1998, pp. 113–16Google Scholar; Ratzinger, Joseph, “Commentary on Profession of Faith's Concluding Paragraphs,” Origins, 16 July 1998, pp. 116–19.Google Scholar
38 Mich, Krier, Catholic Social Teaching and Movements, 357–70.Google Scholar
39 John-Stevas, St., The Agonizing Choice, 176–88, 199–206Google Scholar; Untener, , “Humanae Vitae,” p. 13.Google Scholar
40 Curran, , Tensions in Moral Theology, 39–40.Google Scholar
41 Patrick, , Liberating Conscience, 143–44.Google Scholar
42 Ibid., 144.
43 Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Instruction on the Ecclesial Vocation of the Theologian,” Origins, 5 July 1990, p. 123.Google Scholar
44 Catholic Theological Society of America, “Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Mandatum” (September 2000), 4–11Google Scholar; Paul, John II, “To Defend the Faith,” pp. 113–16Google Scholar; Ratzinger, , “Commentary on Profession of Faith's Concluding Paragraphs,” pp. 116–19Google Scholar; D'Antonio, et al. , Laity, American and Catholic, 15–16.Google Scholar
45 Curran, Charles E., Faithful Dissent (Kansas City, MO: Sheed & Ward, 1986), 14–47Google Scholar; Patrick, , Liberating Conscience, 108–18Google Scholar; McCormick, and McBrien, , “L'Affaire Curran II,” p. 128.Google Scholar
46 McCormick, and McBrien, , “L'Affaire Curran II,” pp. 132–43.Google Scholar
47 Haring, Bernard, My Witness for the Church (New York: Paulist, 1992)Google Scholar; Haring, , Free and Faithful: My Life in the Catholic Church (Liguori, MO: Liguori Publishers, 1999), 147–76Google Scholar; McCormick, , The Critical Calling, 71–73.Google Scholar
48 Curran, Charles E., The Catholic Moral Tradition Today: A Synthesis (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1999), 212–13Google Scholar; Jenish, D'Arcy, “The Wrath of Rome,” Maclean's, 15 February 1993, p. 50.Google Scholar
49 Patrick, , Liberating Conscience, 118–28, 137–43.Google Scholar
50 Bole, William, “Sr. McEnsroy Dismissed from St. Meinrad,” National Catholic Reporter 5 May 1995, p. 11.Google Scholar
51 Curran, , Faithful Dissent, 65–68.Google Scholar See also Editorial, “Due Process in the Church,” America, 9 April 2001, p. 3.
52 Quoted in Babych, Art, “Theologian: Sexual Relatedness Drives Out ‘Perverse God,’” National Catholic Reporter, 14 May 1993, p. 12.Google Scholar
53 Patrick, , Liberating Conscience, 137.Google Scholar
54 D'Antonio, et al. , Laity, , American and Catholic, 27, 31–33Google Scholar; Dillon, Michele, Catholic Identity: Balance, Reason, Faith and Power (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Meyer, Katherine, “Women and Men: Declining Commitment, Increased Autonomy and Interest in Decision Making,” National Catholic Reporter, 29 October 1999, p. 17Google Scholar; McCormick, , The Critical Calling, 273–74Google Scholar; Curran, , Tensions in Moral Theology, 74–75.Google Scholar
55 Meyer, , “Women and Men,” pp. 17–19.Google Scholar
56 D'Antonio, et al. , Laity, American and Catholic, 49–50.Google Scholar
57 Untener, , “Humane Vitae,” p. 12.Google Scholar
58 Cahill, Lisa Sowle, “Silencing of Nugent, Gramick Sets a Novel Standard of Orthodoxy,” America, 14 August 1999, pp. 6–10.Google Scholar
59 Patrick, , Liberating Conscience, 20–21Google Scholar; Gudorf, Christine E., Body, Sex, and Pleasure: Reconstructing Christian Sexual Ethics (Cleveland, OH: Pilgrim Press, 1994), 2–3, 7–14Google Scholar; McCormick, , The Critical Calling, 216–17Google Scholar; Curran, , Tensions in Moral Theology, 80–81.Google Scholar
60 Patrick, , Liberating Conscience, 40–41Google Scholar; Curran, , Tensions in Moral Theology, 87–109.Google Scholar
61 Gramick, Jeanine, “Silencing No Safeguard of Truth,” National Catholic Reporter, 27 July 2001, p. 22.Google Scholar
62 Weakland, Rembert G., “Listening Sessions on Abortion: A Response,” Origins, 31 May 1990, pp. 33–42Google Scholar; University of Fribourg, “Vatican bars Honorary Degree for Archbishop Weakland,” Origins, 22 November 1990, pp. 387–89.Google Scholar
63 Bianchi, Eugene C., “Loyalty Within the Clerical Club Matters Most to Holy Office,” National Catholic Reporter, 20 April 2001, p. 17.Google Scholar
64 D'Antonio, et al. , Laity, American and Catholic, 31–33, 49–63Google Scholar; D'Antonio, , “Trends in U.S. Roman Catholic Attitudes, Beliefs, Behavior,” p. 14.Google Scholar
65 Patrick, , Liberating Conscience, 45.Google Scholar