Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T13:59:22.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Catherine Mowry LaCugna's Trinitarian Theology: III- The Ecumenical Implications of Catherine Mowry Lacugna's Trinitarian Theology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2014

Alan J. Torrance
Alan J. Torrance*
Affiliation:
University of St. Andrews
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Symposium
Information
Horizons , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , Fall 2000 , pp. 347 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © The College Theology Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 LaCugna, Catherine Mowry, “Reconceiving the Trinity as the Mystery of Salvation,” Scottish Journal of Theology 38 (1985).1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 LaCugna, Catherine Mowry, God for Us: The Trinity and Christian Life (San Francisco: HarperCollins, 1991), 380.Google Scholar

3 Ibid., 381.

4 LaCugna, , “Reconceiving,” 1.Google Scholar

5 LaCugna, , God for Us, 400–1.Google Scholar

6 Ibid., 401.

7 See chapter 4 of LaCugna, God with Us, entitled “Christian Prayer and Trinitarian Faith.”

8 Jungmann, Josef, The Place of Christ in Liturgical Prayer (New York: Alba House, 1965).Google Scholar

9 LaCugna, , God for Us, 124.Google Scholar

10 Ibid., 125.

11 Cyril of Alexandria (developed by Severus of Antioch and John of Damascus) used enhypostatos to refer to the fact that in the assumption of the flesh the human nature of Christ was given a real concrete hypostasis or subsistence within the hypostatic union—it was enhypostatic in the incarnate Son or Word of God (contrary to Apollinarian or monophysite errors). See Torrance, T. F., The Christian Doctrine of God, One Being, Three Persons (Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1996), 160.Google Scholar

12 LaCugna, , God for Us, 127.Google Scholar It is interesting that this comment should be made by a Roman Catholic theologian.

13 LaCugna, Catherine Mowry, “Philosophers and Theologians on the Trinity,” Modern Theology 2/3 (1986): 178–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar