No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 September 2014
1 See Tilley, Terrency W., “The Institutional Element in Religious Experience,” Modern Theology 10 (1994): 185–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar, where he argues that the recognition of a tradition of communal religious practice is a crucial element in any understanding of religious experience.
2 Davis, Charles, Theology and Political Society: The Hulsean Lectures in the University of Cambridge 1978 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), 1–3;Google Scholar citations from 2.
3 For an example of the critique, see Jameson, Frederic, “Postmodernism and Consumer Society” in The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture, ed. Foster, Hal (Port Townsend, WA: Bay Press, 1983), 111–25.Google Scholar
4 Fiorenza, Francis Schüssler, “Systematic Theology: Task and Methods” in Systematic Theology: Roman Catholic Perspectives, ed. Fiorenza, Francis Schüssler and Galvin, John P., 2 vols. (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991), 1:35–80.Google Scholar
5 See Portier, William L., “Interpretation and Method” in The Praxis of Christian Experience: An Introduction to the Theology of Edward Schillebeeckx, ed. Schreiter, Robert J. and Hilkert, Mary Catherine (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1989), 18–34.Google Scholar