Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:06:29.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The New Religious Dimension in Western Marxism: II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2014

Rudolf J. Siebert
Rudolf J. Siebert*
Affiliation:
Western Michigan University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Both Marxists and phenomenologists have a critical attitude toward religion. For the phenomenologist critique means clarification of meaning; for the Marxist it means the emancipation of men and women from the quasi-natural forces of opaque and ossified traditions, from irrational authorities, and from the ideology which but-tresses unjustifiable dialectical contradictions in civil and socialist society. Marxists such as Georg Lukacs, Max Horkheimer, and Leszek Kolakowski apply ideology critique to the dimension of religion. Lukacs acknowledges not only reactionary, but also progressive aspects in the Catholic and Protestant form of Christianity. For Horkheimer, complete emancipation from faith in a power independent from history and at the same time determining it belongs to the most primitive intellectual clarity and veracity of modern humanity. But Horkheimer continues to read the Bible. He observes and suffers deeply from the immeasurable gap between the moral norms and values which Europeans have acknowledged since the introduction of Christianity and the behaviour of the European Christians, which is the difference between Christian theory and practice. Kolakowski finds the antagonism between the philosophy of the priest and the philosophy of the jester in all spheres of human life, including religion. The priest eternalizes and guards the absolutes acknowledged at certain times in certain societies. The jester, on the other hand, continually questions what societies consider ultimate and doubts everything “given” in any social formation. Finally Horkheimer sums up the whole Western Marxist theory of religion in his assertion that the concept of God kept alive the idea that there are other norms besides those to which the finite world considered as nature, society and history gives expression. The concept of Infinity preserves an awareness of the finality of human life and of the inalterable aloneness and abandonment of humanity. Horkheimer cannot affirm any philosophy or politics which does not also embrace a theological moment. Theology is the hope and the longing that the injustice which characterizes the world as society, state and history today may not have the last word.

Type
Articles
Information
Horizons , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , Spring 1977 , pp. 43 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © The College Theology Society 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

131 Rombach, Heinrich, “Die Religionsphänomenologie,” in Theologie und Philosophie, 1973, pp. 477–493Google Scholar; Bloch, Ernst, Thomas Munzer. Als Theologe der Revolution (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1972), pp. 147, 178, 205, 207Google Scholar.

132 Kisiel, Theodor, “Ideology Critique,” in Philosophy Today 14, 3, pp. 151–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

133 Bloch, Ernst, Man on His Own (New Hork: Herder and Herder, 1970), Chaps. 1–5Google Scholar; Rombach, , “Religionsphänomenologie,” pp. 477–493Google Scholar.

134 Kisiel, , “Ideology Critique,” p. 153Google Scholar; Husserl, E., The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology (Evanston: Northwestern University, 1970)Google Scholar; Marcuse, Herbert, One-Dimensional Man (Boston: Beacon Press, 1966), Chaps. 5, 6, 7Google Scholar; Habermas, J., Knowledge and Interest (Boston: Beacon Press, 1971), Parts II, IIIGoogle Scholar.

135 Bettis, Dabney, Phenomenology of Religion (New York: Harper and Row Publishers, 1969), p. 3Google Scholar.

136 Kisiel, , “Ideology Critique,” p. 153Google Scholar.

137 Ibid.; Habermas, , Knowledge, pp. 187–317Google Scholar; Marcuse, Herbert, An Essay on Liberation (Boston: Beacon Press, 1969), Chaps. I, IIGoogle Scholar; Hegel, Georg, Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Religion (Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Friedrich Fromann Verlag, 1965), pp. 182–183, 265–267Google Scholar. (Vol. VII of Sämtliche Werke [reissue of Jubilaumsausgabe, 1840–44] hereafter cited as Werke.)

138 Kant, Immanuel, Die Metaphysik der Sitten (Berlin: Druck und Verlag von Georg Reimer, 1974), pp. 205–491Google Scholar.

139 Kisiel, , “Ideology Critique,” p. 154Google Scholar; Radnitzky, G., Contemporary Schools of Meta-Science (New York, 1970), II, pp. 64, 170Google Scholar.

140 Lukacs, Georg, 'Schriften zur Ideologie und Politik (Neuwied: Hermann Luchterhand Verlag, 1967), p. 613Google Scholar.

141 Ibid.; Lukacs, Georg, Die Zerstorung der Vernunft (Berlin, 1954)Google Scholar.

142 Lukacs, , Schriften, pp. 613–614Google Scholar.

143 Ibid., p. 614.

144 Ibid., pp. 614–615.

145 Ibid.; Baerwald, Friedrich, “Der Einfluss der Katholiken auf die politische Moral der USA,” in Frankfurter Hefte 28, 6 (Juni, 1973), pp. 392–399Google Scholar.

146 Lukacs, , Schriften, pp. 614–615Google Scholar.

147 Ibid.

148 Ibid., pp. 615–616.

149 Lortz, Joseph, Geschichte der Kirche (Munster: Verlag Aschendorff, 1964), pp. 545, 786–788, 796, 846, 857Google Scholar.

150 Lukacs, , Schriften, pp. 615–616Google Scholar.

151 Ibid., p. 616.

152 Metz, Johannes B., Theology of the World (New York: Seabury Press, 1969), Chap. VGoogle Scholar; Gutierrez, Gustavo, A Theology of Liberation (Maryknoll, N.Y.: Orbis Books, 1973), pp. 9–10, 31, 40, n. 26, 29 and 30, 104, 106–107, 123, n. 20, 124, n. 25, 137, 141, n. 2, 187, n. 98, 216, 219–220, 222, 224, 244, n. 59, 249, n. 121, 284, n. 51Google Scholar.

153 Horkheimer, Max, Notizen 1950 bis 1969 und Dämmerung (Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Verlag, 1974), p. 286Google Scholar; Horkheimer, , Zur Kritik der instrumentallen Vernunft (S. Fischer Verlag, 1967), pp. 216–228Google Scholar.

154 Horkheimer, , Notizen, p. 286Google Scholar; Amery, Jean, “Das Jahrhundert ohne Gott,” in FH 23, 3 (March, 1968), pp. 151–158Google Scholar; Schmidt, Wilhelm, Die Religion der Religionskritik (München: Claudius Verlag, 1972), pp. 90–91Google Scholar.

155 Horkheimer, , Notizen, p. 286Google Scholar.

156 Ibid.; Horkheimer, , Die Sehnsucht nach dem ganzanderen (Hamburg: Furche Verlag, 1971), pp. 56–57Google Scholar.

157 Horkheimer, , Notizen, p. 287Google Scholar; Horkheimer, Max, “Zu Theodor Haecker: Der Christ und die Geschichte,” in Zeitschrift fur Sozialforschung V, pp. 379–382Google Scholar.

158 Horkheimer, Max, “Foreword,” in Jay, Martin, The Dialectical Imagination (Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1973), p. xiGoogle Scholar.

159 Horkheimer, , Notizen, pp. 288–289Google Scholar; Genesis 4:1–26.

160 Horkheimer, , Notizen, p. 288Google Scholar; Genesis 4:6.

161 Horkheimer, , Notizen, p. 316Google Scholar.

162 Ibid.; Kogon, Eugen, Der SS-Staat (Frankfurt am Main: Europaische Verlagsanstalt, 1965), pp. v–xiv, Chaps. I-IIIGoogle Scholar; Horkheimer, Max und Adorno, Theodor W., Diaiektik der Aufklarung (Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Verlag, 1969), Chap. VGoogle Scholar; Horkheimer, , Zur Kritik, pp. 302–316, 317–320Google Scholar.

163 Horkheimer, , Notizen, p. 318Google Scholar.

164 Ibid., p. 96

165 Ibid., p. 318.

166 Ibid., pp. 141–142.

167 Ibid., pp. 318–319.

168 Ibid., p. 319.

169 Ibid.

170 Ibid., pp. 96–97, 141–142; Werke VII, pp. 182–183, 265–267.

171 Horkheimer, , Notizen, p. 319Google Scholar.

172 Ibid., pp. 92–93.

173 Kolakowski, Leszek, Der Mensch ohne Alternative (München, 1964), p. 476Google Scholar.

174 Horkheimer, , Notizen, p. 103Google Scholar.

175 Adorno, Theodor W., Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie (Neuwied: Hermann Luckterhand Verlag, 1970), pp. 7–79, 81–101, 103–123Google Scholar; Marcuse, Herbert, Counter-Revolution and Revolt (Boston: Beacon Press, 1972), Chap. IGoogle Scholar; Marcuse, Herbert, An Essay on Liberation (Boston: Beacon Press, 1969), pp. vii–x, 3–6, Chap. I is pertinentGoogle Scholar.

176 Horkheimer, , “Foreword,” p. xiiGoogle Scholar.

177 Kolakowski, Leszek, The Alienation of Reason (New York: Garden City, 1968), Chaps. I, VIIIGoogle Scholar; Horkheimer, , Notizen, pp. 101$104, 116–117Google Scholar; Horkheimer, , Die Sehnsucht, pp. 60–61, 83–89Google Scholar; Flechtheim, Ossip, Futurologie, Der Kampf um die Zukunft (Cologne: Verlag Wissenschaft und Politik, 1971), Chap. 9Google Scholar; Werke VII, pp. 277–278.

178 Kolakowski, , Der Mensch, p. 476Google Scholar.

179 Ibid., pp. 276–277.

180 Ibid.

181 Ibid., p. 276; Kolakowski, Alienation, Chap. VIII; Popper, Karl R., The Open Society and Its Enemies (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1971), Chap. 12Google Scholar; Kisiel, , “Ideology Critique,” pp. 151–160Google Scholar.

182 Kolakowski, , Der Mensch, p. 276Google Scholar.

183 Ibid., p. 277.

184 Marcuse, Herbert, “Marxism and the New Humanity: An Unfinished Revolution,” in Marxism and Radical Religion, ed. Raines, John C. and Dea, Thomas (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1970), p. 10Google Scholar; see also Casey, W., The Berrigans (New York, 1971)Google Scholar; Küng, Hans, Freiheit des Christen (Hamburg, 1971)Google Scholar; Metz, Johannes B., Befreiendes Gedachtnis Jesu (Main, 1970)Google Scholar; Metz, Johannes B., Freiheit in Gesellschaft (Freiburg, 1971)Google Scholar; Saltin, G., Impulse zur Freiheit (Dusseldorf, 1971)Google Scholar.

185 Marcuse, Counter Revolution, Chap. I; Kogon, Eugen, “Der Trend,” in FH 29, 11 (November, 1974), pp. 773–774Google Scholar; Kolakowski, , Der Mensch, p. 277Google Scholar.

186 Kolakowski, , Der Mensch, p. 277Google Scholar.

187 Ibid.

188 Pain, R., The Life and Death of Adolf Hitler (New York: Praeger Publishers, 1973), pp. 3–411Google Scholar; Kogon, Der SS Staat, Chaps. I–IV.

189 Kolakowski, , Der Mensch (Chap. I is pertinent), p. 277Google Scholar; Bloch, Ernst, Das Prinzip Hoffnung (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1959), Chaps. 53–55Google Scholar.

190 Kolakowski, , Der Mensch, p. 280Google Scholar.

191 Ibid.

192 Ibid.; Bloch, Das Prinzip, Chaps. 53–55; Bloch, Ernst, Experimentum Mundi (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1975), Chap. 43Google Scholar.

193 Horton, Paul B., Sociology (New York: McGraw Hill Co., 1964), pp. 498–499Google Scholar.

194 Kolakowski, , Der Mensch, p. 270Google Scholar.

195 Ibid.

196 Ibid.; Walzer, M., The Revolution of the Saints (New York, 1968), Chaps. I, IV, VGoogle Scholar.

197 Kolakowski, , Der Mensch, p. 277Google Scholar; Horkheimer, , Die Sehnsucht, pp. 54–89Google Scholar; Horkheimer, , Zur Kritik, pp. 335–353Google Scholar.

198 Kolakowski, , Der Mensch, p. 277Google Scholar; Werke VII, pp. 266–267.

199 Horkheimer, Max, Critical Theory (New York: Herder and Herder, 1972), p. 129Google Scholar.

200 Ibid.; Horkheimer, , Die Sehnsucht, pp. 54–89Google Scholar.

201 Horkheimer, , Critical Theory, p. 131Google Scholar.

202 Ibid., pp. 129–131; Horkheimer, , Die Sehnsucht, pp. 54–89Google Scholar; Horkheimer, , Zur Kritik, pp. 216–268Google Scholar; Bloch, , Das Prinzip, p. 53Google Scholar; Bloch, , Experimentum, p. 43Google Scholar.

203 Horkheimer, , Critical Theory, p. 131Google Scholar; Horkheimer, , Die Sehnsucht, p. 54Google Scholar.

204 Horkheimer, Max, Werk und Wirken Paul Tillichs (Stuttgart, 1967), p. 16Google Scholar.

205 Ibid.; Horkheimer, , Zur Kritik, pp. 248–268Google Scholar.

206 Horkheimer, , Werk, p. 16Google Scholar.

207 Horkheimer, , Zur Kritik, p. 236Google Scholar.

208 Horkheimer, , Die Sehnsucht, pp. 60–62Google Scholar.

209 Ibid.; Werke II, p. 517.

210 Horkheimer, , Die Sehnsucht, pp. 61–62Google Scholar.

211 Horkheimer, , “Zu Theodor Haecker,” pp. 372–383Google Scholar; Haecker, Theodor, Der Christ und die Geschichte (Leipzig: Hegner, 1935)Google Scholar.