Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:24:16.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Evils of Theodicy. Four Perspectives - III

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2014

J. Patout Burns
J. Patout Burns*
Affiliation:
Washington University in St. Louis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Symposium
Information
Horizons , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , Fall 1991 , pp. 300 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © The College Theology Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Enchiridion, xxv, 100.Google Scholar

2 Robert O'Connell's magisterial study of Augustine's struggle with the twin questions of the origin of the human soul and the transmission of Adamic guilt provides a wonderful exposition of this form of defense. See The Origin of the Soul in Augustine's Later Works (New York: Fordham University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

3 See, e.g., the list of propositions which he presents in de gratia Christi xlvii, 52.

4 At the end of his first full discussion of the doctrine of gratuitous election, Augustine reflected on the inscrutability of the divine judgment (see de diuersis quaestionibus ad Simplicianum, I, ii, 22).