Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:37:55.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“A War of Ideas”: The Rise of Conservative Teachers in Wartime New York City, 1938–1946

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Zoë Burkholder*
Affiliation:
Montclair State University, Montclair, New Jersey

Extract

On the evening of May 17, 1946, more than 1,200 festive supporters streamed into the Brooklyn Academy of Music to honor a New York City teacher who had survived, by the skin of her teeth, charges of “un-American” teaching. Since 1935, New York City's public school teachers faced the threat of investigation and dismissal for potentially subversive radical political beliefs or affiliations. Tonight, however, the audience breathed a collective sigh of relief that the Board of Education hearing had turned out well and that the teacher in question would retain her position.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 History of Education Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 These included New York's Ives Loyalty Oath for teachers in 1934, a state committee investigation of Communist teachers in 1936, and in 1938 the federal House Un-American Affairs Committee (HUAC), also known as the Dies Committee. Marjorie Heins, Priests of Our Democracy: The Supreme Court, Academic Freedom, and the Anti-Communist Purge (New York: New York University Press, 2013), 4366; Schrecker, Ellen W., No Ivory Tower: McCarthyism and the Universities (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986), 63–83.Google Scholar

2 Marja, Fern, “1,348 Whoop for May Quinn: Bar Post Girl,” New York Post 18 May, 1946, 16.Google Scholar

3 Award of Honor,” The Educational Signpost 9, no. 5 (May 1946): 1. “American Education Association,” Anti-Semitism and Extremism Collection (ASEC), Center for Jewish History, New York, NY.Google Scholar

4 1,200 Back Miss Quinn,” New York Times, 18 May 1946, 4; “The Case of May Quinn: Report by Teachers Guild.” United Federation of Teachers (UFT) Records. WAG 022. Box 8, Folder 10. Tamiment Library and Robert F. Wagner Labor Archives, New York University, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar

5 Russell, Rose, “We Condemn May Quinn for Action, Not Membership,” New York Teacher News 13, no. 11 (November 1952): 4.Google Scholar

6 4,000 Protest at May Quinn Case,” New York Times, 5 April 1946, 32. Also see “Rally vs. May Quinn,” PM, 6 March 1946. Box 8, Folder 11. UFT Records.Google Scholar

7 “The Case of May Quinn: Report by Teachers Guild.” Also see Rose Russell, “We Condemn May Quinn for Action, Not Membership,” New York Teacher News 13, no. 11 (November 1952): 4; “Report of the Trial Committee of May A. Quinn, Board of Education of the New York City, 27 February, 1946.” Box 8, Folder 10. UFT Records.Google Scholar

8 On May Quinn, see Taylor, Clarence, Reds at the Blackboard: Communism, Civil Rights, and the New York City Teachers Union (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011), 7576, 184, 195; Zietz, Joshua M., White Ethnic New York: Jews, Catholics, and the Shaping of Postwar Politics (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2007), 89–92; Biondi, Martha, To Stand and Fight: The Struggle for Civil Rights in Postwar New York City (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003), 243–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Heins, , Priests of Our Democracy, Taylor, , Reds at the Blackboard; Schrecker, , No Ivory Tower. Google Scholar

10 On TU membership numbers in 1940 see Heins, Priests of Our Democracy, 35; Taylor, , Reds at the Blackboard, 60. On Guild numbers, see Fine, Benjamin, “Teachers Guild Scans Records of Applicants,” New York Times, 21 September 1941, D5. Also see “What's in a Name?” Better Schools 2, no. 6 (March–April 1940), 72; “The AEA Policy,” The Educational Signpost 1, no. 3 (May 1938): 1. Box 5, RC220. Investigation Files of the Rapp Coudert Committee (IFRCC). TAM 533. Tamiment Library and Wagner, Robert F. Labor Archives, New York University, New York, NY.Google Scholar

11 Karier, Clarence J., The Individual, Society, and Education: A History of American Educational Ideas, 2nd ed. (Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1991), especially Chapter 10 “A Fascist and a Communist View of the Function of the American School,” 258–85. It is important to note that the question raised here about the relationship between pedagogy and democracy is perennial as each generation struggles to work out the relationship between public education and democracy in a changing social context. Tracey Steffes, School, Society, and State: A New Education to Govern Modern America, 1890–1940 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012); Kliebard, Herbert M., The Struggle for the American Curriculum, 1893–1958, 3rd edi. (New York: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar

12 The N.E.A.,” The Educational Signpost 1, no. 3 (May 1938): 12. Box 5, RC220. IFRCC.Google Scholar

13 Heins, , Priests of Our Democracy; Perrillo, Jonna, Uncivil Rights. Teachers, Unions, and Race in the Battle for School Equity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012); Burkholder, Zoe, Color in the Classroom: How American Schools Taught Race, 1900–1954 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011); Taylor, , Reds at the Blackboard; Andrew Hartman, Education and the Cold War: The Battle for the American School (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2008); Lyons, John F., Teachers and Reform: Chicago Public Education, 1929–1974 (Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2008); Johnson, Lauri, “Making Democracy Real,” Urban Education 37, no. 5 (2002): 566–88; Murphy, Marjorie, Blackboard Unions: The AFT and the NEA, 1900–1980 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990); Schrecker, , No Ivory Tower; Iversen, Robert W., The Communists and the Schools (New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Co., 1959).Google Scholar

14 Kliebard, , The Struggle for the American Curriculum, 151–74; Ravitch, Diane, The Great School Wars: A History of New York City Public Schools, revised ed. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000 [1974]), 233–40; Zilversmit, Arthur, Changing Schools: Progressive Education Theory and Practice, 1930–1960 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993), 3789; Cremin, Lawrence A., The Transformation of the School: Progressivism in American Education, 1876–1957 (New York: Vintage Books, 1964 [1961]), 228–73.Google Scholar

15 For a thorough consideration of this process see, Mirel, Jeffrey, The Rise and Fall of an Urban School System: Detroit, 1907–1981, 2nd ed. (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, 1999), 89150. On retrenchment battles in New York City, see Burkholder, Color in the Classroom, 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Foster, Stuart J. and O. L. Davis Jr., “Conservative Battles for Public Education within America's Culture Wars: Poignant Lessons for Today from the Red Scare of the 1950s,” London Review of Education 2, no. 2 (July 2004): 123–35, see page 124. See also Taylor, Reds at the Blackboard, 113. For more on the relationship of World War II to public education see Charles Dorn, American Education, Democracy, and the Second World War (New York: Palgrave Macmillian, 2007); Gerard Giordano, Wartime Schools: How World War II Changed American Education (New York: Peter Lang, 2004).Google Scholar

17 Some studies date the rise of conservativism to political backlash of the 1960s, for instance, Farber, David and Roche, Jeff, The Conservative Sixties (New York: Peter Lang, 2003); Klatch, Rebecca E., A Generation Divided: The New Left, the New Right, and the 1960s (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999); Rick Perlstein, “Who Owns the Sixties? The Opening of a Scholarly Generation Gap,” Lingua Franca 6 (May–June 1996): 3037. Other scholars have taken a longer view, for example, Darren Dochuk, “Revival on the Right: Making Sense of the Conservative Movement in Post-World War II American History,” History Compass 4 (September 2006): 975–99; Nash, George H., The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America Since 1945, 30th anniversary ed. (Wilmington, DE: Intercollegiate Studies Institute, 2006 [1976]); Chappell, David L., “The Triumph of Conservatives in a Liberal Age,” in A Companion to Post-1945 America, ed. Agnew, Jean-Chnstophe and Rosenzweig, Roy (Maiden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 2002), 303–27. Finally, some scholars push the revolt against liberalism back to the New Deal era, see for instance, Phillips-Fein, Kim, Invisible Hands: The Businessmen's Crusade against the New Deal (New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 2009).Google Scholar

18 On the history of America conservativism, see: “Conservativism: A Round Table,” Journal of American History 98, no. 3 (2011): 723–73 and the forum “The Problem of American Conservativism,” American Historical Review 99 (April 1994): 409–37. Major works on the topic include the following: Zelizer, Julian E., “Rethinking the History of American Conservativism,” Reviews in American History, 38 (June 2010): 367–92; Allitt, Patrick, The Conservatives: Ideas and Personalities throughout American History (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2009); Critchlow, Donald T. and Maclean, Nancy, Debating the American Conservative Movement: 1945 to the Present (New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 2009); Carter, Dan T., The Politics of Rage: George Wallace, the Origins of the New Conservativism, and the Transformation of American Politics, 2nd ed. (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2000 [1995]); Powers, Richard G., Not Without Honor: The History of American Anticommunism (New York: Free Press, 1995); Leffler, Melvyn P., The Specter of Communism: The United States and the Origins of the ColdWar, 1917–1953 (New York: Hill and Wang, 1994); Ribuffo, Leo P., “Why Is There So Much Conservatism in the United States and Why Do So Few Historians Know Anything about It?” American Historical Review 99, no. 2 (1994): 438–49; Brinkley, Alan, Liberalism and Its Discontents (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998); Fried, Richard M., Nightmare in Red: The McCarthy Era in Perspective (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990); Bennett, David H., The Party of Fear: From Nativist Movements to the New Right in American History (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1988). Ribuffo, Leo P., The Old Christian Right: The Protestant Far Right from the Great Depression to the Cold War (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

19 Durr, Kenneth D., Behind the Backlash: White Working Class Politics in Baltimore, 1940–1980 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2003); McGirr, Lisa, Suburban Warriors: The Origins of the New American Right (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002); Nicolaides, Becky M., My Blue Heaven: Life and Politics in the Working Class Suburbs of Los Angeles, 1920–1965 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002); Kurt Shuparra, Triumph of the Right: The Rise of the California Conservative Movement, 1945–1966 (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharp, Inc., 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20 Heins, , Priests of Our Democracy, 42–43; Nash, George H., Reappraising the Right: The Past and Future of American Conservativism (Wilmington, DE: Intercollegiate Studies Institute, 2009), 169201; Schrecker, No Ivory Tower, 24–62; Bayor, Ronald H., Neighbors in Conflict: The Irish, Germans, Jews, and Italians in New York City, 1929–1941, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1988), 57–108; Ribuffo, Leo P., The Old Christian Right, 8–13. Stack, John F. has drawn similar conclusions about the relationship of Jews and Irish in Boston, see International Conflict in an American City: Boston's Irish, Italians, and Jews, 1935–1944 (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1979).Google Scholar

21 Bayor, , Neighbors in Conflict, 25–26. Also see Christina Collins, Ethnically Qualified: Race, Merit, and the Selection of Urban Teachers, 1920–1980 (New York: Teachers College Press, 2011), 101–2; Kate Rousmaniere, City Teachers: Teaching and School Reform in Historical Perspective (New York: Teachers College Press, 1997), 45.Google Scholar

22 Taylor, , Reds at the Blackboard, 12–60; Schrecker, , No Ivory Tower, 52–54; Murphy, , Blackboard Unions, 151–61; Zitron, Celia Lewis, The New York City Teachers Union, 1916–1964: A Story of Educational and Social Commitment (New York: Humanities Press, 1968): 2231.Google Scholar

23 Adler, Irving, p. 6. Folder 1: Irving Adler Interview: Transcript, Box 3. Frederic Ewen Audiotape Collection, OH052. Tamiment Library and Robert F. Wagner Labor Archives, New York University, New York, NY.Google Scholar

24 McNamara, Patrick, “‘Catholic Journalism with Its Sleeves Rolled Up': Patrick F. Scanlan and the Brooklyn Tablet, 1917–1968,” U.S. Catholic Historian 25, no. 3 (Summer 2007): 87107; Bayor, , Neighbors in Conflict, 57–108. On American interest in fascism, see Allitt, The Conservatives, 153–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25 Brinkley, Alan, Voices of Protest: Huey Long, Father Coughlin, and the Great Depression (New York: Vintage Books, 1983): 252–61. Also see Powers, , Not without Honor, 132–45. For more on the attack by the conservative Catholic press on progressive education, see Johnson, Lauri, “‘One Community's Total War against Prejudice': The Springfield Plan Revisited,” Theory and Research in Social Education 34, no. 3 (2006): 301–23.Google Scholar

26 Irwin, Theodore, “Inside the ‘Christian Front,” Forum and Century (March 1940): 102–8.Google Scholar

27 Anti-Semitic Acts Stir Protest Here,” New York Times, 30 December 1943, 19.Google Scholar

28 Norwood, Stephen H., “Marauding Youth and the Christian Front: Antisemitic Violence in Boston and New York During World War II,” American Jewish History 91, no. 2 (2003): 233–67; Fein, Gene, “For Christ and Country: The Christian Front in New York City, 1938–1951” (PhD dissertation, New York: City University of New York, 2006); Bayor, , Neighbors in Conflict, 98; Gleason, Philip, “Pluralism, Democracy, and Catholicism in the Era of World War II,” The Review of Politics 49, no. 2 (1987): 208–30.Google Scholar

29 Meeting Minutes of Conference Board, May 10, 1938. Box 10, Folder 36. UFT Records. Also see “Anti-Semitic Acts Stir Protest Here,” New York Times, 30 December 1943, 19; “Teachers Warned Bias Is Spreading,” New York Times, 8 January 1939, 13. On anti-Semitism in New York schools see Markowitz, Ruth J., My Daughter, the Teacher: Jewish Teachers in the New York City Schools (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. 1993): 161–63.Google Scholar

30 Campbell Decries Teacher Cleavage,” New York Times, 7 March 1940, 30; “Drive to Teach Tolerance Ideal,” New York Times, 5 March 1939, D9; Fine, Benjamin, “Schools to Open Tolerance Drive,” New York Times, 16 January 1938, 46; “Commissioner Boosts Tolerance Programs,” New York Teacher 4, no. 5 (1939): 1; Lewis, Celia, “Schools for Tolerance,” New York Teacher 4, no. 3 (1938): 10–11.Google Scholar

31 1,000 Teachers Join Drive on Leftists,” Brooklyn Daily Eagle, 11 April 1938, 3; “New Group Widens City School Row,” New York Times, 11 April 1938, 32; “Conservative Educators Unite,” New York Sun, 9 March 1938, 36; “Teachers Union Hits New Group,” New York Sun, 12 March 1938, 6. The AEA was originally called the Educational Discussion Group.Google Scholar

32 The Teachers Guild reported in 1938 that the AEA had about 2,000 members. “Teachers Guild Associates/Auxiliary Committee on Intolerance in the Schools—Minutes” (1938) Box 10, Folder 30. UFT Records.Google Scholar

33 “New Group Widens City School Row.”Google Scholar

34 Donohue, John J., “Whither Signpost?” The Independent 1, no. 1 (November 1938): 3. Mary Cornelia Barker Papers; Manuscript, Archive, and Rare Book Library, Robert W. Woodruff Library, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.Google Scholar

35 The Educational Signpost 1, no. 1 (March 1938): 1. IFCRR.Google Scholar

36 “Why Has the ‘Educational Signpost’ Received Such a Warm Welcome?” The Educational Signpost 1, no. 2 (April 1938): 12. Box 11, Folder 3. Charles Hendley Papers (CHP), Library, Tamiment and Wagner, Robert F. Labor Archives, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar

37 Executive Committee, “Declaration of Policy,” Better Schools 1, no. 1 (September 1938): 57.Google Scholar

38 Communications,” Better Schools 1, no. 8 (June 1939): 110; “The Alliance in 1938: Presidents Reports of Achievement during the Year,” Better Schools 1, no. 4 (December 1938): iii; “Forward, Alliance!” Better Schools 1, no. 2 (Oct. 1938): 17.Google Scholar

39 Whalen, Edward, “Beware– The Alliance,” The Independent 1, no. 1 (November 1938): 3. MCBP.Google Scholar

40 Minutes on meeting of October 6, 1938. Box 10, Folder 45. UFT Records.Google Scholar

41 Campbell Decries Teacher Cleavage,” New York Times, 7 March 1940, 30.Google Scholar

42 Russell, Bertrand, Why I am Not a Christian: And Other Essays on Religion and Related Subjects (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1957), 249.Google Scholar

43 “Teachers Guild Associates/Auxiliary Committee on Intolerance in the Schools—Minutes” (1938).Google Scholar

44 In the late 1930s, American liberals generally interpreted Catholicism as predisposed to and supportive of fascism, see Gleason, , “Pluralism, Democracy, and Catholicism in the Era of World War II,” 211. Patrick Allitt explains why many Americans were drawn to fascism in the 1930s, see The Conservatives, 152–57.Google Scholar

45 Stieglitz, Sarah Thornwald, “Signpostiad,” New York Teacher vol. 4, no. 2 (November 1938): 19. The AEA and Alliance in turn taunted that the teachers unions were now “moribund teaching groups,” according to the Alliance or “timid, shrinking violets,” according to the AEA. See for example “Communication” Better Schools 1, no. 7 (June 1939): 110 and “Union Chooses Not to Work,” The Educational Signpost 4, no. 5 (May 1941): 1–4. CHP.Google Scholar

46 “Teachers Guild Associates/Auxiliary Committee on Intolerance in the Schools—Minutes” (1938).Google Scholar

47 Lewis, Celia, Chairman, Academic Freedom Committee, “Witch-Hunting – 1940,” New York Teacher 5, no. 6 (March 1940): 1516, quote p. 16. Also see Teachers Union report, “Fascism in the New York City Schools” December 1941, p. 1. Box 13, Folder 11, CHP.Google Scholar

48 We Are neither Fascist nor Nazist,” The Educational Signpost 1, no. 2 (April 1938): 1. Box 11, Folder F3, CHP.Google Scholar

49 Christian Front leaders, likewise, denied any formal association with European fascism and likely had no direct association with fascist leaders. Alan Brinkley, Voices of Protest, 276–80. Also see the discussion of “brown smearing,” the liberal tactic of claiming that all conservatives were fascists, which Richard Gid Powers claims was a major problem in the early years of World War II in the United States, see Not Without Honor: The History of Anti-Communism (New York: Free Press, 1995), 163.Google Scholar

50 The AEA and Alliance both claimed to be opposed to fascism, see for instance: “Fight Renewed on Activity Program,” New York Sun, 27 September 1939, 40; “No Nazi Units in City Schools, Vet Rally Told,” Brooklyn Eagle, 20 March 1939, 8.Google Scholar

51 Declaration of Policy of the Teachers Alliance,” Better Schools 1, no. 1 (September 1938): 67. Also see Russell, William F., “Should Teachers Unionize?” Better Schools 1, no. 1 (September 1938): 8–9.Google Scholar

52 Wrfalen, Frank D., “Teacher Organizations and the School Supervisor,” Better Schools 1, no. 1 (September 1938): 11.Google Scholar

53 Juddson, H. M., Letter to the Editor, Better Schools 1, no. 6 (February-March 1939): 88.Google Scholar

54 “Communistic Sympathizer and Public School Teacher at One and the Same Time? Is It Possible?” The Educational Signpost 1, no. 1 (March 1938): 12. Box 5, RC220. IFRCC.Google Scholar

55 Teachers Guild Associates/Auxiliary Committee on Intolerance in the Schools Minutes December 9, 1938, p. 1. Box 10, Folder 30. UFT Records. Although many TU leaders were members of the Communist Party USA at this time, Taylor argues that the union overall pursued a local agenda of improving the quality of public education and work conditions for teachers. Taylor, Reds at the Blackboard. Google Scholar

56 “Communistic Sympathizer and Public School Teacher at One and the Same Time? Is It Possible?” 1.Google Scholar

57 On the Rapp Coudert Committee see Heins, Priests of Our Democracy, 51–66. The AEA and the Alliance immediately made their membership lists available to the Rapp Coudert Committee, after the Committee subpoenaed the TU membership lists. “Membership Available to Coudert Committee,” Bulletin of the Teachers Alliance, 1 no. 3 (January 1941): 1. Letter from McDonald, Milo F. to Windels, Paul, September 11, 1940. “Sampson-McDonald Material” Box 5, RC220. IFRCC.Google Scholar

58 The Ives Law,” The Educational Signpost 2, no. 2 (February 1939): 4. CHP.Google Scholar

59 Lewis, Celia, “On Your Guard: The Rapp-Coudert Resolution to Investigate the Schools,” New York Teacher 5, no. 9 (June 1940): 11.Google Scholar

60 Heins, , Priests of Our Democracy, 65–6.Google Scholar

61 The Red Revelation,” The Teachers Alliance Bulletin 1, no. 5 (April 1941): 2. See also “The Governor and the Coudert Committee,” Teachers Alliance Bulletin 1, no. 6 (May 1941): 3.Google Scholar

62 “Some Questions for the Examining Committee” The Educational Signpost 4, no. 7 (October 1941): 1. CHP.Google Scholar

63 Kliebard, , The Struggle for the American Curriculum; Zilversmit, , Changing Schools. Google Scholar

64 McDonald, Milo F., American Education: The Old, the Modern, and the New (New York: American Education Association, 1952), Introduction. Also see “The New Cowardice,” Better Schools 1, no. 5 (January 1939): 63; “The Alliance Comes of Age,” Better Schools 2, no. 4 (December 1939): 42.Google Scholar

65 McDonald, Milo F., “What I Think of the Social Frontier,” Teachers College Record Volume 5 Number 46, 1939, 272–75. http://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 13948, Date Accessed: 4/4/2013; McDonald, , American Education, Introduction, n.p.Google Scholar

66 “Are Days of Activity Program Numbered?” The Educational Signpost 4, no. 5 (May 1941): 1. CHP.Google Scholar

67 McDonald, Milo F., “The Case against the Activity Program,” Better Schools 1, no. 6 (February-March 1939): 8183.Google Scholar

68 Gleason, , “Pluralism, Democracy, and Catholicism in the Era of World War II,” 210. Also see Allitt, , The Conservatives, 129–36.Google Scholar

69 Ravitch, , Great School Wars, 237–39.Google Scholar

70 Seeley, Evelyn, “Teachers in Dilemma on Old and New Ideas,” PM, 1 May 1945, 16. Box 7, Folder 10. UFT Records. For the TU's position on the Activity Program see Zitron, The New York City Teachers Union, 60–62. A letter of support for the Activity Program from the Teachers Guild can be found in the following: Letter from Pollack, Francis D. to Loftus, John. April 26, 1938 Box 10, Folder 24. UFT Records.Google Scholar

71 Parents Revolt,” The Educational Signpost 2, no. 5 (May 1939): 4. Box 5, RC220. IFRCC. Also see Selma Maximon, “Parents and the Activity School,” Better Schools 1, no. 5 (1939): 85.Google Scholar

72 “Two Boys Kill Teacher in School after ‘Showing Off’ by Smoking,” New York Times, 3 October 1942, 1. Also see “Teacher Is Beaten by Angry Mother as Class Looks On,” New York Times, 12 December 1942, 1.Google Scholar

73 As the Twig Is Bent,” The Bulletin of the Teachers Alliance 3, no. 1 (October 1942): 2. Also see “Rowdyism in the Schools,” The Bulletin of the Teachers Alliance 3, no. 2 (December 1942): 1.Google Scholar

74 Hush Hush Policy Must Cease,” The Educational Signpost 8, no. 8 (November 1945): 2. UFT Records.Google Scholar

75 On Weekday Religious Education see Jonathan Zimmerman, Whose America: Culture Wars in the Public Schools (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002), Chapter Six, “Religious Education in the Public Schools,” 135–59.Google Scholar

76 “Let's Look at the Record,” Better Schools 3, no. 1 (1940): 2.Google Scholar

77 Religious Education: Release Time Now Possible for All Children,” The Educational Signpost 3, no. 1 (January 1940): 4. Box 5, RC220. IFRCC. Also see, “Parents Organization Asks for Religious Instruction for Pupils,” The Educational Signpost 3, no. 2 (February 1940): 2. Box 5, RC220. IFRCC; “Released Time Plan Passes,” The Educational Signpost 3, no. 4 (April 1940): 4. Box 5, RC220. IFRCC.Google Scholar

78 “Is Release Time a Menace?” Better Schools 2, no. 7 (May 1940): 9495.Google Scholar

79 The New School Year,” The Educational Signpost 4, no. 7 (October 1941): 1 and 3. CHP.Google Scholar

80 Probationary Schools to Be Opened,” Bulletin of the Teachers Alliance 3, no. 4 (May 1943): 1.Google Scholar

81 Threaten Civil Suit over Acquitted Teacher in Bias Case,” Canadian Jewish Review 8 March 1946. http://www.multiculturalcanada.ca/node/149978/full?display=full.Google Scholar

82 “The Case of May Quinn: Report by Teachers Guild.” UFT Records.Google Scholar

83 Miss Quinn Case Seen Based on Vengeance,” The Tablet, 17 November 1945; “Assails Charges Against Teacher,” The Tablet, 16 November 1945; Friends of Democracy, Press Release November 1945. Box 8, Folder 10. UFT Records.Google Scholar

84 Heins, , Priests of Our Democracy, 69–102.Google Scholar

85 The Educational Signpost 13, no. 5 (December 1950): 1. ASEC.Google Scholar

86 National Commission for the Defense of Democracy, “Danger: They're After Our Schools” (Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, 1948). Box 1069, Folder 7. National Education Association-National Commission for the Defense of Democracy, 1922–1971; National Education Association Collection; Special Collections Research Center, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

87 American Education Association (1938–1975),” FBI Headquarters File 62-HQ-71730. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

88 Taylor, , Reds at the Blackboard, 218–25. Also see Bella Dodd's autobiography, Schools of Darkness (New York: Kennedy, P. J., 1954).Google Scholar

89 The Educational Signpost, May 1956 (no cover page), Right Wing Collection of the University of Iowa Libraries (RWC), 1918–1977. Microfilm. University of Iowa Libraries, Iowa City, IA.; The Educational Signpost 18, no. 2 (March 1956). RWC; The Educational Signpost 15, no. 1 (December 1952). “AntiSemitism and Extremism Collection, American Education Association.” ASEC; The Educational Signpost 9, no. 8 (November 1946). ASEC.Google Scholar