No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 February 2017
BETWEEN THE 1880s and the 1920s a growing band of English Canadians created and began to test a new consensus on the situation of the child in their society. In the four major dimensions of their enterprise they worked to change the nature and improve the quality of family life, to establish new systems of child and family welfare, to transform Canadian education, and to organize child and family health care. Of these reform efforts the public health movement had the most immediate, the least ambiguous, and the most accurately measurable positive effects on the lives of Canadian children.
1. I examine this reform movement as a whole in my forthcoming Ph.D. dissertation, “Children in English-Canadian Society: Framing the Twentieth Century Consensus” (Minnesota, 1973). See also my article “The Urban Child,” History of Education Quarterly, 9 (Fall 1969): 305–11.Google Scholar
2. Bryce, Peter H., “History of Public Health in Canada,“ Canadian Therapeutist and Sanitary Engineer 1 (June 1910): 278–91.Google Scholar
3. Ibid., p. 290; see also Bryce, Peter H., “The Story of Public Health in Canada“ in A Half Century of Public Health: Jubilee Historical Volume of the American Public Health Association, ed. Ravenel, Mazÿck P., (New York, 1921), pp. 56–66.Google Scholar
4. Defries, R. D., ed., The Development of Public Health in Canada: A Review of the History and Organization of the Public Health in the Provinces of Canada, with an Outline of the Present Organization of the National Health Section of the Department of National Pensions and National Health, Canada (Toronto, 1940), pp. 15, 35, 49, 56, 67, 90, 101, 115, 131. For the background to the Ontario legislation, see Bryce, “History of Public Health,” pp. 287–90, and Splane, R. D., Social Welfare in Ontario, 1791–1893: A Study of Public Welfare Administration (Toronto, 1965), p. 199. For an account of the English Public Health Act of 1875, see Frazer, W. M., A History of English Public Health, 1834–1939 (London, 1950), pp. 114–25.Google Scholar
5. Ontario Board of Health, Report, 1883, p. xlvi.Google Scholar
6. Ibid., 1891, p. 38.Google Scholar
7. See, for example, Victoria Colonist, April 13, 1897, p. 8, and May 14, 1897, p. 8.Google Scholar
8. Ontario Board of Health, Report, 1898, pp. 68–75; Toronto Globe, May 2, 1900, p. 7, and May 4, 1900, p. 12.Google Scholar
9. Jost, A. C., “The Conservation of Child Life,“ P.H.J., 11 (November 1920): 503–12.Google Scholar
10. Ontario Board of Health, Report, 1887, pp. iii–v.Google Scholar
11. New Westminster British Columbian, March 14, 1885. See also Victoria Colonist, October 17, 1891, p. 1, British Columbian May 11, 1894, p. 3, Colonist, January 8, 1900, p. 4, and Toronto Globe, June 19, 1900, p. 12.Google Scholar
12. Ontario, Board of Health, Report, 1885, pp. 29–34.Google Scholar
13. Ibid., 1887, p. v; ibid., 1888, pp. iv–vi.Google Scholar
14. British Columbian, June 3, 1892, p. 4.Google Scholar
15. P.H.J., 2 (April 1911): 184.Google Scholar
16. Ibid., 2 (May 1911): 221; ibid., 3 (May 1912): 249–55.Google Scholar
17. Saskatchewan Bureau of Public Health, Report, 1919–1920, p. 8. For an account of the legal status of compulsory vaccination, see Bargen, Peter Frank, The Legal Status of the Canadian Public School Pupil (Toronto, 1961), p. 79.Google Scholar
18. See, for example, Ontario Board of Health, Report, 1882, pp. 168–76; ibid., 1883, pp. xlv, 400–8.Google Scholar
19. See, for example, ibid., 1883, pp. xlvi, 242–43; ibid., 1890, pp. xiii–xvi, lxxxix–xcvii; British Columbian, April 9, 1892, p. 4.Google Scholar
20. Ontario Board of Health, Report, 1883, pp. 242–43.Google Scholar
21. Rosen, George, A History of Public Health (New York, 1958), pp. 344–403.Google Scholar
22. Ontario Board of Health, Report, 1892, p. 19; ibid., 1891, p. 1.Google Scholar
23. Ibid., 1892, p. 19.Google Scholar
24. Privy Council Medical Research Council, Diphtheria: Its Bacteriology, Pathology and Immunology (London, 1923), pp. 44–63, 126–29, 232–35; Winslow, C.-E., The Life of Hermann M. Biggs: Physician and Statesman of the Public Health (Philadelphia, 1929), pp. 102–30; Rosen, History of Public Health, pp. 319–20, 333–36; and Ontario Board of Health, Report, 1890, pp. lvii–lxii.Google Scholar
25. Ontario Board of Health, Report, 1901, p. 8.Google Scholar
26. Ibid., 1890, p. lxxviii; Defries, Development of Public Health in Canada, pp. 77–88.Google Scholar
27. Medical Research Council, Diphtheria, pp. 61–62.Google Scholar
28. Biggs, Hermann, “The Development of Research Laboratories,“ New York Department of Health, Monthly Bulletin 1 (March 1911): 54–56.Google Scholar
29. See, for example, Ontario Board of Health, Report, 1899, p. 12.Google Scholar
30. Mullin, R. H., “Recent Advances in the Control of Diphtheria,“ Canadian Medical Association Journal 14 (May 1924): 398–406.Google Scholar
31. Ontario Board of Health, Report, 1903, p. 46.Google Scholar
32. Ibid., 1901, p. 93.Google Scholar
33. Ibid., 1903, p. 48.Google Scholar
34. In a crude comparison of home versus hospital treatment Bryce demonstrated this fact as early as 1903. Ibid., 1903, p. 52. See also the much more accurate confirmation of the efficacy of hospital treatment in Toronto between 1912 and 1919 in Mullin, “Recent Advances.”Google Scholar
35. Ontario Board of Health, Report, 1920, pp. 37–38; Defries, Development of Public Health in Canada, pp. 77–88.Google Scholar
36. Saskatchewan Bureau of Public Health, Report, 1917–1918, p. 17.Google Scholar
37. Ontario Board of Health, Report, 1920, p. 167.Google Scholar
38. Medical Research Council, Diphtheria, pp. 349–61.Google Scholar
39. See, for example, Ontario Board of Health, Report, 1921, p. 204.Google Scholar
40. Ibid., 1920, p. 37.Google Scholar
41. Urquhart, M. C. and Buckley, K. A. H., eds., Historical Statistics of Canada (Toronto, 1965), p. 45.Google Scholar
42. Ontario Board of Health, Report, 1901, pp. 110–11.Google Scholar
43. Ibid., p. 6; see also ibid., 1899, pp. 72–74.Google Scholar
44. Rosen, , History of Public Health, p. 365.Google Scholar
45. Frazer, , English Public Health, p. 257.Google Scholar
46. Ibid., pp. 256–58, 323–24.Google Scholar
47. Rosen, , History of Public Health, p. 366.Google Scholar
48. Winslow, , Biggs, p. 157.Google Scholar
49. Ibid., p. 186.Google Scholar
50. Struthers, Lina Rogers, The School Nurse: A Survey of the Duties and Responsibilities of the Nurse in the Maintenance of Health and Physical Perfection and the Prevention of Disease Among School Children (New York, 1917), pp. 17–18.Google Scholar
51. Winslow, , Biggs, p. 193.Google Scholar
52. Ibid., pp. 214–15.Google Scholar
53. Ibid., p. 215; for a more detailed account of the work of the Division of Child Hygiene, see “Division of Child Hygiene,” New York Department of Health Monthly Bulletin 1 (January 1911): 14–16, and Lederle, Ernst J., “The Needs of the Department of Health,“ ibid., 1 (October 1911): 236–37.Google Scholar
54. Russell Sage Foundation, What American Cities are Doing for the Health of School Children: Report Covering Conditions in 1038 Cities (New York, 1911). The report was summarized for Canadians in P.H.J., 2 (September 1911): 433.Google Scholar
55. Ontario, , Sessional Papers, 1907 no. 62, pp. 23–26; Kerr, James and Wallis, E. W., eds., Transactions of the Second International Congress on School Hygiene, London, 1907, 3 vols. (London, 1908); Maloine, A., ed., Ille Congrès International D'Hygiene Scolaire, Paris, 2–7 Aout, 1910, 3 (Paris, 1911), p. 9.Google Scholar
56. Auden, George A., “School Inspection and the Public Health Service,“ P.H.J., 2 (May 1911): 207–10. See also Guest, L. Haden, “Poverty and School Clinics,” ibid., 2 (July 1911): 317–19; Guest, L. Haden, “School Clinics,” ibid., 4 (May 1913): 272–77.Google Scholar
57. International Congress of Women, Report of the International Congress of Women, held in Toronto, Canada, June 24–30, 1909, 2 vols. (Toronto, 1910), 2:57.Google Scholar
58. Commission of Conservation, Report, 1910, p. 132.Google Scholar
59. P.H.J., 2 (June 1911): 276.Google Scholar
60. Adams, J. G., Bryce, to P. H., February 10, 1896, quoted in National Council of Women [hereafter cited as N.C.W.], Yearbook, 1896, p. 463; Webster, A. E., “Status of Dentistry,” Dominion Dental Journal [hereafter cited as D.D.J.] 22 (December 1910): 571–607.Google Scholar
61. N.C.W., Yearbook, 1896, pp. 35, 41–42, 457–70; Ontario Board of Health, Report, 1896, pp. 76–82; Colonist, July 25, 1896, p. 8.Google Scholar
62. Ontario Board of Health, Report, 1896, pp. 80–82.Google Scholar
63. N.C.W., Yearbook, 1896, p. 459.Google Scholar
64. Ibid., pp. 49–50, 457–60, 469–70.Google Scholar
65. Ibid., p. 467.Google Scholar
66. Vancouver School Board, Report, 1903, p. 17.Google Scholar
67. Laberge, J. Edouard, “Inspection médicale des maisons d'éducation,“ Bulletin Sanitaire 9 (1909): 117–24.Google Scholar
68. P.H.J., 5 (February and March 1914): 91–98, 150–60.Google Scholar
69. While the P.H.J. did not list William, Fort, the National Council of Women's Public Health Committee in 1911 noted it as one of a number of communities where medical inspection was under way (N.C.W., Yearbook, 1911, pp. 43–47).Google Scholar
70. See also Ravenhill, Alice, “The Health of Public School Children in British Columbia,“ The Child 4 (June 1914): 697–99.Google Scholar
71. N.C.W., Yearbook, 1910, pp. i–ii.Google Scholar
72. Steven, Edward Miller, Medical Supervision in Schools: Being An Account of the Systems at Work in Great Britain, Canada, the United States, Germany, and Switzerland (London, 1910), pp. 182–83.Google Scholar
73. Ibid.Google Scholar
74. Wood, Alfred, “The Largest Sick Children's Hospital in the World,“ Canadian Magazine 12 (February 1899): 314–18; Toronto Evening Telegram, December 20, 1909, p. 18; Toronto Globe, June 1, 1918, pp. 5, 7; “Robertson, John Ross, “ in Middleton, J. E., The Municipality of Toronto: A History (Toronto and New York, 1923), pp. 57–58.Google Scholar
75. Evening Telegram, January 14, 1910, p. 18; Globe, January 28, 1910, p. 14.Google Scholar
76. Globe, February 25, 1910, p. 16; Evening Telegram, February 25, 1910, p. 10.Google Scholar
77. Carter, Bruce N., “James L. Hughes and the Gospel of Education: A Study of the Work and Thought of a Nineteenth-Century Canadian Educator“ (Ed.D. diss., University of Toronto, 1966), p. 360.Google Scholar
78. P.H.J., 2 (December 1911): 588–89.Google Scholar
79. Browne, Jean, “School Nursing in Regina,“ P.H.J., 5 (February 1914): 91–92; “Medical Inspection of Schools in the Middle West,” ibid., pp. 94–95; “Medical Inspection of Schools in Ontario,” ibid., 5 (March 1914): 159–60.Google Scholar
80. “Medical Inspection of Schools in Nova Scotia,” P.H.J., 5 (February 1914): 98.Google Scholar
81. N.C.W., Yearbook, 1912, p. 102; Heagerty, John J., Four Centuries of Medical History (Toronto, 1928), pp. 226–45.Google Scholar
82. Ontario Board of Health, Report, 1910, pp. 148–50.Google Scholar
83. Struthers, , The School Nurse, pp. 132–43; see also Ayres, Leonard P., Open Air Schools (New York, n.d.).Google Scholar
84. Hockin, Daniel, “The Rotary Clinic,“ Twenty-fifth Anniversary of Rotary Club of Vancouver, Canada: 1913–1938 (Vancouver, 1938), pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
85. See, for example, Canada, Department of Health, Handbook of Child Welfare Work in Canada for the Year, March 31, 1922 [hereafter cited as Handbook], ed. MacMurchy, Helen, (Ottawa, 1923), p. 56.Google Scholar
86. P.H.J., 5 (March 1914): 160.Google Scholar
87. Browne, , “School Nursing in Regina,“ pp. 91–93.Google Scholar
88. “Medical Inspection of Schools in British Columbia,” ibid., 5 (March 1914): 150.Google Scholar
89. Ibid., p. 153.Google Scholar
90. Struthers, , The School Nurse, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
91. “Medical Inspection in Quebec,” P.H.J., 5 (March 1914): 156.Google Scholar
92. Struthers, , The School Nurse, p. 40.Google Scholar
93. P.H.J., 4 (February 1913): 94.Google Scholar
94. “Complimentary dinner to Dowd, John W. by the Toronto Dental Society, Nov. 22, 1910,” D.D.J., 22 (December 1910): 570–600.Google Scholar
95. “Editorial Notes,” D.D.J., 22 (October 1910): 511–12.Google Scholar
96. Dowd, John W., “The Mouth and the Teeth as Factors in Public Health,“ D.D.J., 22 (December 1910): 573.Google Scholar
97. P.H.J., 2 (May 1911): 221.Google Scholar
98. For the origin and development of the oral hygiene crusade, see Hicks, E. B., “Free Examination of School Children's Teeth: What Oral Hygiene Means to Them,“ D.D.J., 22 (October 1910): 460–66; Day, Arthur, “What is Being Done Outside of the Dental Office for the Improvement of the Human Mouth,” P.H.J., 3 (May 1912): 235–39; Dieck, Professor Dr., “The Care of the Teeth of School Children in Germany,” ibid., 4 (June 1913): 366–69, and McCluggage, Robert M., A History of the American Dental Association: A Century of Health Service (Chicago, 1959), pp. 248–53. For what dentists saw as the social implications of their work see the talk by Thornton, Dr. A. W., Toronto, to the Canadian Public Health Association's 1912 meeting entitled “The Dentist as Social Worker,” P.H.J., 3 (September 1912): 524; and Cowan, W. D., “Dental Caries in School Children and Dental Inspection,” ibid., 4 (November 1913): 602–5.Google Scholar
99. See, for example, Stuart, James, “Public School Medical Inspection,“ Canadian Therapeutist 1 (August 1910): 379–81.Google Scholar
100. P.H.J., 3 (April 1912): 222; see also, Kennedy, C. P., “Report on the Mouths and Teeth of the Children in Two Public Schools of Toronto,” D.D.J., 22 (December 1910): 571–72, and Webster, A. E., “Dental Inspection of Two Schools in Toronto,” ibid., pp. 600–4.Google Scholar
101. See, for example, Struthers, The School Nurse, pp. 141–42, 205–25, and Browne, “School Nursing in Regina,” p. 93.Google Scholar
102. British Columbia Board of Health, Report, 1920, p. 15.Google Scholar
103. Canada, Dominion Bureau of Statistics, Historical Statistical Survey of Education in Canada (Ottawa, 1921), p. 110.Google Scholar
104. International Congress of Women, Report … 1909, 2:58.Google Scholar
105. P.H.J., 3 (April 1912): 222.Google Scholar
106. Handbook, p. 153.Google Scholar
107. Ibid., pp. 81–82.Google Scholar
108. Vancouver School Board, Report, 1919, p. 39.Google Scholar
109. Ontario Board of Health, Report, 1921, p. 317.Google Scholar
110. Handbook, p. 40.Google Scholar
111. Ibid., p. 78.Google Scholar
112. Brown, Alan, “Problems of the Rural Mother in the Feeding of Her Children,“ P.H.J., 9 (July 1918): 297.Google Scholar
113. See “Children in English-Canadian Society,” pt. 2.Google Scholar