Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 February 2017
The Social Frontier, a hybrid of political radicalism and progressive educational theory, appears as an anomaly when viewed from the perspective of American educational history. This union of education and politics also has made certain features of the journal's history difficult, if not impossible, to interpret. Although it was sponsored by many of the more influential leaders of the progressive education movement, its platform failed to attract a large following among classroom teachers. The John Dewey Society for the Study of Education and Culture and the Progressive Education Association were both affiliated with the journal, but the latter constantly found it a source of embarrassment. Even the wide variety of intellectuals—e.g., Eric Goldman, Harold Laski, John Herman Randall, Jr., and Leon Trotsky—who contributed an occasional article, thus giving the journal wider intellectual interest, were not aware of its educational philosophy. The journal appealed for educators to unite with the labor movement, but the labor unions—including the teachers' union—made no effort to encourage the supporters of the journal or to endorse their philosophy of social reconstruction. The journal's strong declaration of purpose and impressive list of directors and contributors created the impression of organizational stability and purpose, even though the former was partly illusory and the latter eroded away.
1. The significance of the Social Frontier program and its impact on subsequent educational developments will be examined more thoroughly in a book that the writer is presently working on.Google Scholar
2. Kilpatrick, William H., “Launching the Social Frontier ,” The Social Frontier, I, No. 1 (October 1934), 2.Google Scholar
3. Woelfel, Norman, personal communication.Google Scholar
4. Schlesinger, Arthur M. Jr., The Politics of Upheaval (Boston, 1960), 161.Google Scholar
5. Ibid., 393.Google Scholar
6. Social Frontier, II, No. 1 (October 1935), 23.Google Scholar
7. Goldman, Eric F., Rendezvous with Destiny (New York, 1959), 275.Google Scholar
8. Woelfel, personal communication.Google Scholar
9. Woelfel, personal communication.Google Scholar
10. Jackman Bovard, Berdine, A History of the Progressive Education Association, 1919–1939 (Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, 1941), 192–193.Google Scholar
11. Wattenberg, William W., On the Educational Front (New York, 1936), 146.Google Scholar
12. Iversen, Robert W., The Communists and the Schools (New York, 1959), 115.Google Scholar
13. Hofstadter, Richard, The Age of Reform (New York, 1960), 308.Google Scholar
14. Dewey, John, Experience and Education (New York, 1938), vii.Google Scholar
15. Bode, Boyd, Progressive Education at the Crossroads (New York, 1938), 10.Google Scholar
16. Ibid., 122.Google Scholar
17. Alberty, Harold, et al., “Progressive Education: Its Philosophy and Challenge,” Progressive Education, XVIII (1941), Special Supplement to the May Issue.Google Scholar
18. Bovard, op. cit., 193.Google Scholar
19. Carson Ryan, W. Jr., “Announcement,” Social Frontier, V, No. 46 (June 1939), 259.Google Scholar
20. Rugg, Harold, Foundations for American Education (New York, 1947), 581.Google Scholar
21. Kilpatrick, William H., “The New Management: A Fresh Hold on a Continuing Effort,” Frontiers of Democracy, VI, No. 47 (October 1949), 4.Google Scholar
22. Counts, George, “Orientation,” Social Frontier, I, No. 1 (October 1934), 4–5.Google Scholar
23. Rugg, op. cit., 581.Google Scholar
24. Tibbetts, Vinal H., “A Message from the President of the Progressive Education Association,” Frontiers of Democracy, X, No. 79 (October 1943), 2.Google Scholar
25. Rugg, op. cit., 581.Google Scholar
26. Rugg, Harold, “We Accept in Principle But Reject in Practice: Is This Leadership?” Frontiers of Democracy, X, No. 81 (December 1943), 71–72.Google Scholar
27. Rogers, Virgil M., “Statement by President Rogers,” Frontiers of Democracy, X, No. 81 (December 1943), 70.Google Scholar