Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T23:39:44.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Religion and the Schools: The Case of Utrecht

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

John Valk
John Valk*
Affiliation:
University of New Brunswick
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The matter of religion and the schools has again surfaced in the public forum, both in Canada and the United States. Public officials, private groups, and individual parents have shown renewed interest in the place of religion in education. The decline of established religion, the erosion of personal religious involvement, and the increased ignorance of the historical role of religion have been linked to its absence in the public schools. Furthermore, some see the waning of public morality and Christian values as reciprocally related to the complete secularization of public education. All of this has sparked intense debate. Concern regarding a religiously hollow curriculum, an absence of moral guidance, and a lack of spiritual vision in public education is growing. Also on the rise is the number of parents choosing private schools, even home schooling, for their children.

Type
Articles
Information
History of Education Quarterly , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , Summer 1995 , pp. 159 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the History of Education Society 

References

1 Smith, Page, Killing the Spirit: Higher Education in America (New York, 1990); Marsden, George M. and Longfield, Bradley J., eds., Secularization of the Academy (New York, 1992); Marsden, George, The Soul of the American University: From Protestant Establishment to Established Unbelief (New York, 1994); Sollod, Robert N., “The Hollow Curriculum: The Place of Religion and Spirituality in Society is Too Often Missing,” Chronicle of Higher Education, 18 Mar. 1992, A60; Summers, Christina Hoff, “Teaching the Virtues,” AFA Journal (Jan. 1992), 13–16; Smith, Eleanor, “The New Moral Classroom,” Psychology Today (May 1989), 32–36.Google Scholar

2 For a history of education in Germany, see Lamberti, Marjorie, State, Society, and the Elementary School in Imperial Germany (New York, 1989); and idem, “State, Church, and the Politics of School Reform during the Kulturkampf,” Central European History 19 (Mar. 1986): 63–81; Schleunes, Karl A., “Enlightenment, Reform, Reaction: The Schooling Revolution in Prussia,” Central European History 12 (Dec. 1979): 315–42; Helmreich, Ernst Christian, Religious Education in German Schools: An Historical Approach (Cambridge, Mass., 1959). For a history of education in France, see Moody, Joseph N., French Education since Napoleon (Syracuse, N.Y., 1978); Zeldin, Theodore, France, 1848–1945 (Oxford, Eng., 1977), vol. 2; Stock-Morton, Phyllis, Moral Education for a Secular Society: The Development of Morale Laique in Nineteenth Century France (Albany, N.Y., 1988). For a history of education in England, see Sanderson, Michael, Education, Economic Change, and Society in England, 1780–1870 (London, 1983); Digby, Anne and Searby, Peter, Children, School, and Society in Nineteenth Century England (London, 1981); Murphy, James, Church, State, and Schools in Britain, 1800–1970 (London, 1971); Best, G. F. A., “The Religious Difficulties of National Education in England, 1800–70,” Cambridge Historical Journal 12 (1956): 155–73. For a history of education in Canada and the United States, see Binder, Frederick M., The Age of the Common School, 1830–65 (New York, 1974); Glenn, Charles Leslie Jr., The Myth of the Common School (Amherst, Mass., 1988); Tyack, David, “The Kingdom of God and the Common School,” Harvard Educational Review 36 (no. 4, 1966): 447–69; Curtis, Bruce, Building the Educational State: Canada West, 1836–1871 (Barcombe, Lewes, 1988); Donald Wilson, J., Stamp, Robert M., and Audet, Louis-Philippe, eds., Canadian Education: A History (Scarborough, Ont., 1970).Google Scholar

3 Goslinga, Adriaan, De beschrijving van de geschiedenis van de schoolstrijd: Voordracht den 15den April gehouden op het Philologencongres te Groningen (Amsterdam, 1925), 10–11. Karl Schleunes concludes the following regarding the centrality of schooling in Europe: “Of the revolutionary transformations that shaped the nineteenth-century European world, no one of them touched more directly the lives of the broad masses than did the development of the schooled society.” Schleunes, , “Enlightenment, Reform, Reaction,” 315. According to Best, education in the English context was bound up with the interests and prospects of the nation itself, and is “a problem common to all States and societies.” Best, , “The Religious Difficulties,” 160.Google Scholar

4 “Kerkeraad Nederlands Hervormde Gemeente,” Inventaris 1–3, Gemeente Archief Utrecht (hereafter GAU).Google Scholar

5 In 1851 Reformed Protestants numbered approximately 27,500 and Catholics 18,000, out of a total population of 48,000. In 1900, Reformed Protestants numbered 53,800 and Catholics 38,000, out of a total population of 104,190. Gemeente Verslagen Utrecht, no. 3404, 1851–1900, and Kerkeraad Nederlands Hervormde Kerk: Inventaris 1834, GAU.Google Scholar

6 See Rasker, A. J., De Nederlandse Hervormde Kerk vanaf 1795: Haar geschiedenis en theologie in de negentiende en twintigste eeuw (Kampen, 1981). The Afgescheidenen numbered approximately 100 in 1834 and 635 in 1900. The Dolerenden numbered 195 in 1893 and 5,137 in 1900. Gereformeerde Kerk, no. 939, and Gemeente Verslagen Utrecht, no. 3404, 1851–1900, GAU.Google Scholar

7 See Beuger, A. H., “De sociale struktuur in de stad Utrecht, 1830–58” (Doctoraalscriptie, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, 1977); and Veldman, J., “De armoede in Utrecht, 1815–50” (Doctoraalscriptie, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, 1954).Google Scholar

8 See van der Meulen, J. W., “Staat van de Utrechtse bedrijven in de 2e helft van de 19e eeuw” (Doctoraalscriptie, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, n.d.); de Jonge, Frida, “Het bedrijfsleven in de stad Utrecht, 1875–1910” (Doctoraalscriptie, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, 1975); and Giele, J. J. and Van Oenen, G. J., “De sociale struktuur van de Nederlands samenleving rond 1850,” Mededelingenblad 45 (May 1974): 2–31.Google Scholar

9 See Schama, Simon, Patriots and Liberators: Revolution in the Netherlands, 1780–1813 (London, 1977); and Rogier, L. J., Katholieke herleving: Geschiedenis van Katholiek Nederland sinds 1853 (The Hague, 1956), 10. For a history of the Patriots in Utrecht, see van Hulzen, Albertus, Utrecht in de Patriottentijd (Zaltbommel, 1966).Google Scholar

10 Joosten, Jacqueline and van Meegeren, Paul, “Politieke leven in Utrecht, 1848–58” (Doctoraalscriptie, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, 1984); van Lingen, B., “De instelling van het gemeentebestuur van Utrecht tot aanzien van het sociale en economische leven van 1840–70” (Doctoraalscriptie, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, 1965).Google Scholar

11 See Hagoort, R., Tot zegen geleid: Gedenkschrift bij het 60 jarig bestaan der Anti-Revolutionaire Kiesvereeniging “Nederland en Oranje” te Utrecht (Utrecht, 1928); van Leeuwen, Herman H., “Doleantie en kleine luyden in de stad Utrecht, 1883–89” (Doctoraalscriptie, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, 1984); Coleman, John, The Evolution of Dutch Catholicism, 1958–1974 (Berkeley, 1978), 31–45; Bakvis, Herman, Catholic Power in the Netherlands (Kingston, 1981), 60–64; and Kat, F. R., “De instelling van het gemeentebestuur van Utrecht tot aanzien van het sociale en economische leven van 1870–1900” (Doctoraalscriptie, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, 1965).Google Scholar

12 Mijnhardt, W. W. and Wichers, A. J., eds., Om het algemeen volksgeluk: Twee eeuwen particulier initiatief, 1784–1984 (Edam, 1984). See also van Veen, J., “Een burger initiatief tot volksbeschaving: Het Departement Utrecht van de Maatschappij tot Nut van het Algemeen en haar activiteiten, 1786–1815” (Doctoraalscriptie, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, 1982).Google Scholar

13 van der Giezen, A. M., “De oprichting,” 1935 (mimeograph) 11–26, GAU. See also de Booy, Engelina Petronella, Kweekhoven der wijsheid: Basis-en vervolgonderwijs in de steden van de provincie Utrecht van 1580 tot het begin der 19e eeuw (Zutphen, 1980), 189–200.Google Scholar

14 “Resolutie van het comite tot publiek onderwijs,” 18 Aug. 1796, no. 966∗∗, Stadsarchief III, GAU. There is no record of the existence of private Catholic schools at this point.Google Scholar

15 Although a collision also occurred in Germany, the constitutional right of the Prussian churches' involvement in public education had been established by the 1794 Civil Code. This right was sustained throughout the century, even though it was periodically tested. See Lamberti, , State, Society, and the Elementary School in Imperial Germany. In England the churches' involvement, through their respective school societies, in the education of the masses was almost assumed, if not expected. See Best, , “The Religious Difficulties.” van der Giezen, A. M., De eerste fase van de schoolstrijd in Nederland, 1795–1806 (Assen, 1937), 44.Google Scholar

16 Koksma, Francois M. C. E., Het karacter van het openbare lager onderwijs (Ph.D. diss., Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, 1888), 4–5. The Minister of Education responsible for the law was J. Hendrik van der Palm. See de Groot, Aart, Leven en arbeid van J. H. van der Palm (Wageningen, 1960). See also Schama, Simon, “Schools and Politics in the Netherlands, 1796–1814,” Historical Journal 13 (1970): 605. Langedijk, D., De geschiedenis van het Protestants-Christelijk onderwijs (Delft, 1953), 8. See also Ginsburg, Harvey Hillson, “The Struggle for the Control of Primary Education in the Netherlands, 1848–1917” (Ph.D. diss., Yale University, 1952), 176. “Request van den Grooten Kerkeraad der Nederduitsche Gereformeerde Gemeente aan het Provinciaal Bestuur,” 1797, “Kerkeraad Nederlands Hervormde Gemeente,” GAU.Google Scholar

17 School Ordonnantie 1802, Hoofdstuk 4, Articlen 16–17, no. 966∗∗, Stadsarchief III, GAU.Google Scholar

18 van der Hulst, W. G., De boom groeide: Twee honderd jaar Nederlandse Hervormde Gemeente scholen te Utrecht, 1748–1948 (Utrecht, 1948), 52–53.Google Scholar

19 “Reglement voor het lager scholen binnen de Bataafsche Republiek,” 1806, Article 22, GAU; Koksma, , Het karacter van het openbare lager onderwijs, 11.Google Scholar

20 “Reglement 1806,” Article 6, GAU; Gilhuis, T. M., Memorietafel van het Christelijk onderwijs: De geschiedenis van de schoolstrijd (Kampen, 1974), 38–39.Google Scholar

21 Quotation from Langedijk, , De geschiedenis van het Protestants-Christelijk onderwijs, 15.Google Scholar

22 “Reglement 1806,” Article 22, GAU; De Booy, , Kweekhoven der wijsheid, 131.Google Scholar

23 This not-so-subtle Protestant bias in the nonsectarian school was also a problem in the United States. See Glenn, Jr., The Myth of the Common School; Tyack, , “The Kingdom of God and the Common School”; and Binder, , The Age of the Common School, 57–73.Google Scholar

24 Langedijk, , De geschiedenis van het Protestants-Christelijk onderwijs, 35. Catholics in Belgium opposed these decrees, regarding them as more Protestant interference in their schools. That interference was one more in a list that eventually led to the Belgian Secession of 1830.Google Scholar

25 An open letter in the Catholic paper, De Noordbrabander, written in 1840 by Jan Wep of Breda, called for freedom of education and worship. See Rogier, , Katholieke herleving, 38–42. A similar situation developed in France. When the state assumed control of education and began to eliminate Catholic involvement in public schools, Catholics and their religious societies struggled for the “freedom to teach.” See Moody, , French Education since Napoleon, 15, 19, 35, 50.Google Scholar

26 Adriani, J. H., “De diakoniescholen der Nederduitsche Hervormde Gemeente te Utrecht,” 1943 (mimeograph), GAU.Google Scholar

27 van der Giezen, A. M., “Een moment uit der onderwijskunde Ontwikkeling van de scholen der Nederduitsche Gereformeerde Gemeente te Utrecht,” Utrecht, 1935 (mimeograph) 4, 8–10, GAU. See also Rietveld van Wingerden, M., “Orthodox Protestanten en het kinderboek,” Documentatieblad voor de Nederlandse kerkgeschiedenis van de negentiende eeuw 25 (Nov. 1986): 32–33.Google Scholar

28 Husen, Reinhard, Schets der algemeene geschiedenis (Amsterdam, 1851), 2: 101. Guillaume Groen van Prinsterer, national leader of the Christian school movement, had written a letter to the Hervormde Kerk in the Hague (Circulaire, Dec. 1843) warning them of the influence of the Society on public schools. See Van der Giezen, , “Een moment,” 13.Google Scholar

29 de Bruin, A. A., Het ontstaan van de schoolstrijd: Onderzoek naar de wortels van de schoolstrijd in de noordelijke Nederlanden gedurende de eerste helft van de 19e eeuw: Een cultuurhistorische studie (Barneveld, 1985), 193, n. 25; Fockema Andreae, J. P., De stad Utrecht, haar historie en haar toekomst (Utrecht, 1926), 42; Suttorp, Leendert Christiaan, Dr. A. W. Bronsveld: Zijn visie op een halve eeuw (Assen, 1966), 13; Adriani, , “De diakoniescholen,” 23.Google Scholar

30 Letter no. 111, 28 Oct. 1842 and 10 July 1843, letter no. 108, 4 Oct. 1843, 8 Dec. 1843, letter no. 29, 11 Aug. 1847, letter no. 20, 3 Nov. 1847, no. 966∗∗, Plaatslijke School Commissie, GAU.Google Scholar

31 Langedijk, , De geschiedenis, 76–77; Oosterlee, P., Geschiedenis van bet Christelijk onderwijs (Haarlem, 1929), 91–96.Google Scholar

32 Brouwer, J., Het binnenste Naar buiten: Beginselen en activiteiten van Mr. J. J. L. van der Bruggben (Zutphen, 1981), 89–109.Google Scholar

33 The School Commission's argument was based on Article 23, Koninklijke Besluit, 1842, no. 61. Letter no. 73, 4 Oct. 1848, letter no. 77, 10 Oct. 1848, letter no. 19, 5 June 1850, letter no. 26, 12 June 1850, letter no. 27, 23 July 1850, letter no. 43, 12 Dec. 1850, no. 966∗∗, Plaatslijke School Commissie, GAU. Regarding approval of the request, see letter no. 45, 31 Dec. 1850. See also letter no. 86, “H. A. R. Vosmaer aan Groen,” 25 Aug. 1850, in van Prinsterer, Guillaume Groen, Briefwisseling (s'Gravenshage, 1964), 3: 58.Google Scholar

34 Langedijk, , De geschiedenis, 110.Google Scholar

35 Loggen, Karin, “Schoolstrijd en volksonderwijs in Utrecht, 1870–1890” (Doctoraalscriptie, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, 1982), 14–18.Google Scholar

36 Diepenhorst, Pieter Arie, Onze strijd in de Staten-Generaal (Amsterdam, 1927), 1: 248.Google Scholar

37 Notulen: Burgemester en Wethouders: Lageronderwijs, 1861, Report 35c, no. 966∗, GAU. One can still see here the influence of the Society for the Public Good. Utrecht Rijksuniversiteit professor C. W. Opzoomer, member and ardent supporter, stated that “what the Society contributes to education is what it spares from prison.” “Maatschappij tot Nut van het Algemeen,” Inventaris 33, “Volksalmanak ‘Nut’,” 1861, 98, GAU. That “contribution” was based on its primary goal: “To improve the general welfare of the people, according to the principles of the Christian religion.” Huishoudelijk Reglement, Article 1, 1854, Inventaris 33, GAU.Google Scholar

38 “Adres van diakenen Hervormde gemeente aan den Koning tegen de wet op de onderwijs,” 4 Aug. 1857, no. 6084, GAU.Google Scholar

39 Report of Th. Enderlee, no. 966a, 1863, Report 24a. Notulen Commissie van Godsdienst Onderwijs, 18 Jan. and 4 Mar. 1867, 12 Jan. 1877, 24 Feb. 1879, no. 626, GAU.Google Scholar

40 Stijnman, Marianne J. A., “De Katholieken en hun emancipatie: Roomse Katholieke scholen te Utrecht in de 19e eeuw” (Doctoraalscriptie, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, 1984); Loggen, , “Schoolstrijd en Volksonderwijs in Utrecht, 1870–90”; nos. 10–12, Archief Diakoniescholen der Nederduitsche Hervormde Kerk te Utrecht, GAU; no. 702, Notulen Hulpvereniging Utrecht van de Vereniging voor Christelijk Nationaal Schoolonderwijs, GAU; “Marnix-Stichting,” Utrecht, n.d. (mimeograph), GAU; no. 966∗∗, Plaatslijke School Commissie, 1857–75, GAU; and Verslagen van het lager onderwijs in de Gemeente Utrecht, 1875, GAU.Google Scholar

41 Article 22, 1878 School Law. Langedijk, , De geschiedenis, 234. By 1888, however, religious instruction was given in only six of the thirteen public schools. Letter from Committee to Kerkeraad, 17 Oct. 1888, no. 626, GAU.Google Scholar

42 Verslagen van het lager onderwijs, 1878–88, GAU.Google Scholar

43 Diakoniescholen, , nos. 14–15, and Utrechtse Kerkbode, 14 and 28 Apr. 1888, GAU.Google Scholar

44 De Oranjevaan, 1 and 22 Oct. and 26 Nov. 1887, GAU.Google Scholar

45 Diakoniescholen, nos. 15–16, and Archief, “De Gereformeerde School,” GAU.Google Scholar

46 In 1900 compulsory education was implemented in the Netherlands. That same year out of 15,605 students and fifty-five schools in Utrecht, 49 percent attended the twenty-three public schools, 28 percent attended the thirteen Protestant schools, and 22 percent attended the fourteen Catholic schools. Gemeente Verslagen Utrecht, no. 3404, 1875–1900, GAU.Google Scholar

47 de Kwaasteniet, Marjanne, Denomination and Primary Education in the Netherlands, 1870–1984 (Amsterdam, 1990); McKim, William A., ed., The Vexed Question: Denominational Education in a Secular Age (St. John's, Newfoundland, 1988).Google Scholar

48 Tannenbaum, Margaret D., “Education Vouchers and First Amendment Rights,” Religion and Public Education 17 (no. 3, 1990): 367–79; Clark Power, F. and Lapsley, Daniel K., eds., The Challenge of Pluralism: Education, Politics, and Values (Notre Dame, Ind., 1992); Locust, Carol, “Wounding the Spirit: Discrimination and Traditional American Indian Belief Systems,” Harvard Educational Review 58 (Aug. 1988): 315–30.Google Scholar