Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:49:03.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Puritan Education in Seventeenth Century England and New England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

Ronald D. Cohen*
Affiliation:
Indiana University Northwest

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Essay Review IV
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 by New York University 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Cremin, Lawrence, American Education: The Colonial Experience, 1607–1783 (New York, 1970), parts I-II. “The sectaries were predominately separatists in their ecclesiology and were opposed to any form of jure divino ecclesiastical polity…. Puritans preferred the possibility of reforming the existing ecclesiastical establishment to the alternative of separatism…. Epistemologically they differed sharply from the sectaries by retaining rationalism in religion, though that rationalism was subordinated to faith and empiricism. The Puritans were moderately primitivistic in their religious and socioeconomic views, but not nearly so much as the sectaries. Puritans were not antiprofessional, though they were not averse to criticizing the legal class in England.” Greaves, pp. 4–5.Google Scholar

2. Greaves, , pp. 37, 39.Google Scholar

3. Ibid., p. 47.Google Scholar

4. Ibid., p. 48.Google Scholar

5. Ibid., p. 62.Google Scholar

6. Ibid., p. 113.Google Scholar

7. Ibid., p. 136.Google Scholar

8. Ibid., p. 137.Google Scholar

9. See, for example, Billings, Warren M., “The Causes of Bacon's Rebellion: Some Suggestions,” Virginia Magazine of History and Biography 78 (Oct. 1970): 409435; Morgan, Edmund S., Roger Williams: The Church and the State (New York, 1967).Google Scholar

10. Middlekauff, , p. ix.Google Scholar

11. Ibid., p. 7.Google Scholar

12. Ibid., p. 8.Google Scholar

13. Ibid., p. 81.Google Scholar

14. Ibid., p. 90.Google Scholar

15. Ibid., p. 93.Google Scholar

16. Ibid., p. 201.Google Scholar

17. See Murrin, John M., “Review Essay,” History and Theory, 11 (1972): 236237.Google Scholar

18. Cremin, , 192.Google Scholar