No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 February 2017
Increased subsidization of education by foundations, corporations, and individuals, as well as the federal government, has caused many citizens again to question the influence of such programs. The thoughtful individual inquires about both the positive and negative potential of aid to education: the capacity to improve public education, as well as to weaken local and state interest in, and control of, the schools. Hence, it appears timely to review an early program of aid to public schools, that of the Peabody Education Fund, and to analyze its effects upon educational programs and local initiative.
1. Proceedings of the Trustees of the Peabody Education Fund (Salem, Mass., 1869 [?]), 138.Google Scholar
2. Curti, Merle, The Social Ideas of American Educators (Patterson, N. J., 1959), 263; Proceedings, 1872, 15, 16; ibid., 1870, 42.Google Scholar
3. Ibid., 1869, Appendix, 15.Google Scholar
4. Ibid., 1873, 38.Google Scholar
5. Rhodes, Francis A., “Samuel B. McLin,” Florida Educators, Florida State University Studies, No. 30 (Tallahassee, 1959), 52–64; Marian Watkins Black, “William Watkin Hicks,” ibid., 65–73; Marian Watkins Black, “William Penn Haisley, ibid., 77–90.Google Scholar
6. Proceedings, 1869, Appendix, 75; ibid., 1870, 41; ibid., 1872, 16, 33.Google Scholar
7. Ibid., 33.Google Scholar
8. Ibid., 1877, 21, 22.Google Scholar
9. Sheats, W. N., “Biennial Report of the State Superintendent,” Florida Senate Journal, (1895), Appendix, 21; J. C. Compton, Notes on the History of Education in Florida (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
10. Proceedings, 1869, Appendix, 75, 76; ibid., 1872, 33.Google Scholar
11. Ibid., 33, 37; ibid., 1879, 221.Google Scholar
12. Pyburn, Nita K., Documentary History of Education in Florida, 1822–1860 (Tallahassee, 1951); Pyburn, The History of the Development of a Single System of Education in Florida, 1822–1903 (Tallahassee, 1954).Google Scholar