Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T06:52:08.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Popularization of Knowledge: John Dewey on Experts and American Democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

Laura M. Westhoff
Laura M. Westhoff*
Affiliation:
Washington University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1900 John Dewey delivered the presidential address to the American Psychological Association (APA) urging his colleagues to adopt scientific methods as the foundation for their work. Psychology, he offered, would “afford [them] insight into the conditions which control the formation and execution of aims, and thus enable human effort to expend itself sanely, rationally, and with assurance.” His address proved an apt greeting to the new century, for it portended the acceptance of social scientific knowledge as the foundation for social reform. But Dewey also alluded to the limitations of the social science professions and the role of experts in the years ahead, warning that “psychology will never tell us just what to do ethically, nor just how to do it.” The question, then, of who would determine the ethical uses of social scientific knowledge and its formulation into public policy in a democratic and bureaucratic society plagued Dewey as the century unfolded. This essay explores Dewey's concerns about the potential threat to democratic community posed by dependence upon experts as policymakers.

Type
Articles
Information
History of Education Quarterly , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , Spring 1995 , pp. 27 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the History of Education Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Dewey, John, Address before the American Psychological Association (1899), Psychological Review 7 (1900), in John Dewey: The Middle Works, 1899–1924 , ed. Boydston, Jo Ann (Carbondale, Ill., 1976), 1: 130–50.Google Scholar

2 My use of the term knowledge is derived from Dewey, John, Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education (New York, 1916), 184–91. He distinguished between knowledge as a process—the outcome of an inquiry and a resource for further inquiry—and as information. While Dewey recognized that individuals cannot possess all knowledge themselves, he emphasized the importance of having at hand the information to deal effectively with a problem. Dewey saw that the possession of such “knowledge” is the foundation for democratic decision making. For elaboration of Dewey's other uses of the term knowledge, see Cremin, Lawrence A., American Education: The Metropolitan Experience, 1876–1980 (New York, 1988), 406ff.Google Scholar

3 Wiebe, Robert H., The Search for Order, 1877–1920 (New York, 1967); Bledstein, Burton, The Culture of Professionalism: The Middle Class and the Development of Higher Education in America (New York, 1976); Haskell, Thomas L., The Emergence of Professional Social Science: The American Social Science Association and the Nineteenth-Century Crisis of Authority (Urbana, Ill., 1977); Furner, Mary O., Advocacy and Objectivity: A Crisis in the Professionalization of American Social Science, 1865–1905 (Lexington, Ky., 1975).Google Scholar

4 Wiebe, , Search for Order; Higham, John, “The Matrix of Specialization,” Veysey, Laurence, “The Plural Organized Worlds of the Humanities,” and Ross, Dorothy, “The Development of the Social Sciences,” in The Organization of Knowledge in Modern America, 1860–1920 , ed. Oleson, Alexandra and Voss, John (Baltimore, Md., 1979); Furner, , Advocacy and Objectivity ; Bledstein, , The Culture of Professionalism, xi.Google Scholar

5 Dewey, John, The Public and Its Problems (Denver, Colo., 1927), 143. See Cremin, , American Education: The Metropolitan Experience, for further discussion of popularization of knowledge in the twentieth century.Google Scholar

6 Ross, Dorothy, The Origins of American Social Science (New York, 1991), 163–69. There is evidence of a millennialist conception of democracy in Dewey's works, particularly his early writings on democracy. See, for example, Dewey, John, “The Ethics of Democracy,” in John Dewey: The Early Works, 1882–1898 (Carbondale, Ill., 1967), ed. Boydston, Jo Ann, 1; and “Christianity and Democracy,” in ibid., 4.Google Scholar

7 See Ross, , The Origins of American Social Science, ch. 10; and Lagemann, Ellen Condliffe, “The Plural Worlds of Educational Research,” History of Education Quarterly 29 (Summer 1989): 210–12.Google Scholar

8 Dewey, John, “Creative Democracy: The Task before Us” (1939), in John Dewey: The Later Works, 1925–1953 (Carbondale, Ill, 1981), 14: 227, cited in Westbrook, Robert, John Dewey and American Democracy (Ithaca, N.Y., 1991), xv.Google Scholar

9 Furner, , Advocacy and Objectivity. Google Scholar

10 Muncy, Robyn, Creating a Female Dominion in American Reform, 1890–1935 (New York, 1991), 160.Google Scholar

11 My definition of historicism, the recognition of change over time created by material, political, and cultural experiences, is based on Ross, , Origins of American Social Science, ch. 1 and ch. 2.Google Scholar

12 Kloppenberg, James T., Uncertain Victory: Social Democracy and Progressivism in European and American Thought, 1870–1920 (New York, 1986), 65. See especially chapter 2, “The Radical Theory of Knowledge.” Google Scholar

13 Dewey, John, “The Significance of the Problem of Knowledge,” in The Early Works, 5: 8, 10.Google Scholar

14 Ibid., 12–14.Google Scholar

15 Ibid., 22; Ross, , Origins of American Social Science, ch. 1; and Kloppenberg, , Uncertain Victory, ch. 3.Google Scholar

16 Dewey, John to Dewey, Alice Chipman, 20 Nov. 1894, John Dewey Papers, Collection #102, Special Collections, Morris Library, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar

17 Furner, , Advocacy and Objectivity, 163–204. Dewey and Bemis both lectured at Hull House, for example. For examples of Dewey's attention to the professional standing of his department, see his letters to William Rainey Harper in the Dewey File, William Rainey Harper MSS, President's Papers, 1889–1925, Special Collections, Regenstein Library, University of Chicago.Google Scholar

18 Dewey, John, “The Scholastic and the Speculator,” in The Early Works, 3: 149 Google Scholar

19 Ibid., 150–51.Google Scholar

20 Ibid., 152.Google Scholar

21 Ibid., 154.Google Scholar

22 Dewey, John, “Beliefs and Existences,” in The Middle Works, 3: 98, 85. Westbrook discusses Dewey's address in the context of the philosophical debate raging between realist and idealist schools over epistemology. This interpretation is valid, but for the purposes of this essay, Dewey's underlying motive, to encourage social usefulness of the profession, is more important. Westbrook, , John Dewey and American Democracy, 124–25.Google Scholar

23 Westbrook, , John Dewey and American Democracy, ch. 7 and ch. 8, provide further insight on Dewey's support for and disillusionment with World War I.Google Scholar

24 Dewey, , The Public and Its Problems, 204–5, 207. The discussion of democratic realists and Dewey's debate with Lippmann is based on Westbrook, , John Dewey and American Democracy, 293–318. My evaluation of Dewey's opposition to Lippmann and the democratic realists differs from Westbrook, however, in that I argue that Dewey's position is characteristic of a larger cultural struggle over the popularization of knowledge.Google Scholar

25 Dewey, , The Public and Its Problems, 77.Google Scholar

26 Ibid., 77, 137.Google Scholar

27 Ibid., 123, 147.Google Scholar

28 Ibid., 111, 149.Google Scholar

29 Ibid., 98.Google Scholar

30 Ibid., 86–87.Google Scholar

31 Ibid., 103, 97.Google Scholar

32 Ibid., 109.Google Scholar

33 Ibid., 219.Google Scholar

34 Ibid., 147, 149. Characteristically, Dewey turned first to education to meet these needs. The School and Society and Democracy and Education provide the best description of Dewey's plans for educating children in a manner that taps their full potential and thus helps create democratic community.Google Scholar

35 Dewey, , The Public and Its Problems, 205–7; Lasch, Christopher, The New Radicalism in America, 1889–1963: The Intellectual as a Social Type (New York, 1965); and Perry, Lewis, Intellectual Life in America: A History (New York, 1984).Google Scholar

36 Dewey, , Democracy and Education, 223; idem, The Public and Its Problems, 142.Google Scholar

37 Robinson, James Harvey, The Humanizing of Knowledge (New York, 1923), v–vi.Google Scholar

38 Ibid., 84, 74–75. In a similar vein, the Yale Institute of Human Relations, designed to promote cross-disciplinary studies of human behavior in authentic social settings, opened in 1928. James Angell, Dewey's former colleague and friend at the universities of Michigan and Chicago, supported and helped open the institute. See Lagemann, , “The Plural Worlds of Educational Research,” 213.Google Scholar

39 Dewey, , The Public and Its Problems, 183, 184.Google Scholar

40 Ibid., 205–6.Google Scholar

41 Savage, Willinda, “John Dewey and ‘Thought News’ at the University of Michigan,” Michigan Alumnus Quarterly Review 56 (1950): 204. Dewey himself explained that the project was too ambitious for the youth and inexperience of Ford and himself. For further information on the “Thought News” project, see Savage, Westbrook, John Dewey and American Democracy, 51–58; and Coughlan, Neil, Young John Dewey: An Essay in American Intellectual History (Chicago, 1973).Google Scholar

42 Ross, , The Origins of American Social Science, ch. 10.Google Scholar

43 Dewey, , Individualism, Old and New (New York, 1930), 154–55. Examples in Ross, , Origins of American Social Science; and Furner, , Advocacy and Objectivity illustrate the decline of activism by social scientists in the early twentieth century.Google Scholar

44 Ross, , The Origins of American Social Science, 472.Google Scholar

45 Dewey, , The Public and Its Problems, 207, 208, 147; idem, Human Nature and Conduct, in The Middle Works, 14: ch. 16. Dewey himself participated in an experiment to overcome cultural barriers in Philadelphia's Polish community. See Westbrook, , John Dewey and American Democracy, 212–22.Google Scholar

46 Kloppenberg, , Uncertain Victory, ch. 10, particularly 401–10.Google Scholar

47 Wilentz, Sean, Chants Democratic: New York City and the Rise of the American Working Class, 1788–1950 (New York, 1984); Thomas, John, Alternative America: Henry George, Edward Bellamy, Henry Demarest Lloyd and the Adversary Tradition (Cambridge, Mass., 1983); Goodwyn, Lawrence, The Populist Moment: A Short History of the Agrarian Revolt in America (New York, 1978); Kaestle, Carl F., Pillars of the Republic: Common Schools and American Society, 1780–1860 (New York, 1983); Gitlin, Todd, The Sixties: Years of Hope, Days of Rage (New York, 1987).Google Scholar