No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 February 2017
The role of the Teachers' Institute in the history of American education has been documented by a succession of competent scholars who indicated the impact of Institutes in furthering the cause of education within the states through the expedient of a grassroots teacher-training program. Institutes were popular in various states at different times; in Michigan they attained popularity during the decades after 1840. While the story of the nineteenth-century struggle to augment teacher capabilities through Institutes is generally well known to the student of educational history, rarely does one have the opportunity to examine the actual proceedings of one of those early Institutes to see exactly what was taking place. It well may be asked: What actually occurred at these meetings? What was the nature of the training which the teachers received, and did it have any real utility? How did the sponsoring authorities attempt to inspire teachers toward a greater professional dedication? These are all legitimate questions worthy of an answer.
1. Putnam, Daniel, The Development of Primary and Secondary Public Education in Michigan (Ann Arbor, 1904), 13.Google Scholar
2. Putnam, , ibid., 133.Google Scholar
3. Putnam, , ibid., 134.Google Scholar
4. Putnam, , ibid., 134–5.Google Scholar
5. Michigan, , Office of Public Instruction, Reports of the Superintendent of Public Instruction for the Years 1855, '56, and '57 (Lansing, 1858), 80.Google Scholar
6. Michigan, , Department of Public Instruction, Twenty-Third Annual Report of the Superintendent of Public Instruction for the Year 1859 (Lansing, 1860), 44.Google Scholar
7. Michigan, , Twenty-Third Annual Report, 43.Google Scholar
8. Michigan, , Twenty-Third Annual Report, 134.Google Scholar
9. Michigan, , Twenty-Third Annual Report, 40.Google Scholar
10. Michigan, , Twenty-Third Annual Report, 41.Google Scholar
11. This line was compressed into three interlinear ones.Google Scholar
12. Indecipherable.Google Scholar
13. Indecipherable.Google Scholar
14. Indecipherable.Google Scholar
15. The hour, probably 1, is omitted.Google Scholar
16. Indecipherable.Google Scholar
17. Indecipherable.Google Scholar
18. Indecipherable except for -tion, but fits the context.Google Scholar
19. Indecipherable.Google Scholar
20. Three indecipherable words.Google Scholar