Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 February 2017
The establishment of the Lincoln School of Teachers College at Columbia University in September 1917 was a reaction against the rigid educational practices of the time. The school developed from the ideas of Charles W. Eliot and Abraham Flexner, who were deeply concerned with the conservative philosophy and lock-step methods of education practiced in the existing schools and who advocated reform of these practices. The publication of Eliot's Changes Needed in Secondary Education and Flexner's A Modern School had influenced the General Education Board under the leadership of Mr. and Mrs. John D. Rockefeller Jr. and Mrs. Willard Straight to recommend to Teachers College that an institution be established that would incorporate the proposed ideas. Both Eliot and Flexner were extremely interested in what was being taught in the schools, feeling that tradition rather than individual or social needs were governing what was included in the curriculum. The General Education Board, in a series of meetings with representatives of Teachers College, convinced them of the value of participating in such an undertaking, and agreement was announced in May 1916. The agreement specified that the proposed modern school be a “laboratory for the working out of an elementary and secondary school curriculum, which shall eliminate obsolete material and endeavor to work up in usable form, materials adapted to the needs of modern living.” The General Education Board agreed to underwrite the annual deficit incurred by the school, and instruction began in September 1917. The Lincoln School opened with a staff of twenty-five and an enrollment of one hundred sixteen in the first five grades and grew rapidly to a staff of over seventy and an enrollment of over five hundred. As had been expected, there was originally great difficulty in finding teaching materials as they had to be developed to fit the philosophy of the school, but contrary to Flexner's expressed fears, there was little difficulty in finding teachers for the enterprise.
1. Cremin, Lawrence A. Shannon, David A., and Evelyn Townsend, Mary, A History of Teachers College Columbia University (New York: Columbia University Press, 1954), p. 110. See also Harold O. Rugg and Ann Shumaker, The Child Centered School (New York: World Book Company, 1928), p. 50.Google Scholar
2. Eliot, Charles W. Changes Needed in American Secondary Education (New York: General Education Board, 1916).Google Scholar
3. Flexner, Abraham A Modern School (New York: General Education Board, 1916).Google Scholar
4. Ibid., pp. 5, 8; Eliot, op. cit., pp. 6, 7, 9.Google Scholar
5. Cremin, op. cit., p. 110.Google Scholar
6. Ibid.; also Harold O. Rugg, That Men May Understand (New York: Doubleday, Doran and Co., 1941), p. 190, n.Google Scholar
7. Cremin, op. cit., p. 110.Google Scholar
8. Rugg, That Men May Understand, p. 190. The Yearly Reports of the Director of the Lincoln School also gives a detailed breakdown of the yearly enrollment.Google Scholar
9. Cremin, op. cit., p. 111.Google Scholar
10. Rugg, Harold O. Foundations for American Education (New York: World Book Company, 1947), p. 559.Google Scholar
11. Rugg, That Men May Understand, p. 186.Google Scholar
12. Ibid., pp. 187-88.Google Scholar
13. Ibid., p. 188.Google Scholar
14. Ibid., p. 193.Google Scholar
15. Letter from John R. Clark to the author, October 6, 1966.Google Scholar
16. Undergraduate and graduate transcripts furnished the author from Dartmouth and the University of Illinois.Google Scholar
17. Teachers College Bulletins, School of Education Announcements for the period 1920 to 1951. Russell Library, Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
18. Willing, Matthew ‘The Value of an Experimental School,” School and Society (May 15, 1926). See also Rugg, Foundations for American Education, p. 567.Google Scholar
19. Rugg, That Men May Understand, p. 191.Google Scholar
20. Ibid., pp. 195-204. Part II of the Twenty-Second Yearbook, The National Society for the Study of Education (Bloomington, Ind.: 1923), outlines Rugg's ideas on the social studies.Google Scholar
21. Rugg, That Men May Understand, pp. 194–95.Google Scholar
22. Ibid., p. 195. See also Part II of the Twenty-Second Yearbook, NSSE, pp. 187-191.Google Scholar
23. “How Shall We Reconstruct the Social Studies Curriculum?” Historical Outlook, XII, No. 5 (May 1921), 184-89.Google Scholar
24. “Needed Changes in Committee Procedures for Reconstructing the Social Studies,” Elementary School Journal, XXI, No. 9 (May 1921), 688-702.Google Scholar
25. Ibid., p. 692.Google Scholar
26. Part II of the Twenty-Second Yearbook, NSSE, p. 188.Google Scholar
27. Part II of the Twenty-Sixth Yearbook, National Society for the Study of Education (Bloomington, Ind.: 1927), p. 3.Google Scholar
28. Ibid., p. 3, n.Google Scholar
29. Rugg, That Men May Understand, p. 205.Google Scholar
30. Ibid., p. 206.Google Scholar
31. Taped interview with Earle Underwood Rugg, Greeley, Colo., May 5, 1966.Google Scholar
32. Rugg, That Men May Understand, p. 206. Also interviews with Earle U. Rugg, May 5, 1966, and Neal Billings, Milwaukee, Wis., March 30, 1966.Google Scholar
33. Rugg, Harold O. Building a Science of Society for the Schools (Boston: Ginn and Company, 1934), p. 10.Google Scholar
34. Rugg, That Men May Understand, pp. 207–8.Google Scholar
35. Ibid., p. 208.Google Scholar
36. Interviews with Earle U. Rugg, May 5, 1966, and Laurance F. Shaffer, New York, December 20, 1966.Google Scholar
37. Jo Montgomery Gambrill, Experimental Curriculum-Making in the Social Studies (Philadelphia: McKinley Publishing Company, 1924), p. 12. Gambrill was then Associate Professor of History at Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
38. Ibid., pp. 14-16.Google Scholar
39. Social Science Pamphlets, First and second editions are on file in the Russell Library, Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
40. Rugg, That Men May Understand, pp. 210–11.Google Scholar
41. Ibid., p. 212.Google Scholar
42. “Social Reconstruction Through Education,” Progressive Education, Volume IX, No. 8, Volume X, No. 1, January 1933.Google Scholar
43. Ibid., p. 13.Google Scholar
44. Rugg, That Men May Understand, p. 216.Google Scholar
45. Ibid., pp. 210-16.Google Scholar
46. Ibid., pp. 213-14.Google Scholar
47. Ibid., p. 218.Google Scholar
48. Rugg, Earle U. was a student of William C. Bagley; Hyman Meltzer, a student of E. S. Evenden. Harold Rugg directed all research.Google Scholar
49. See Notes 23-28.Google Scholar
50. Rugg, That Men May Understand, p. 219.Google Scholar
51. See, for example, Rugg to Ely, November 19, 1924, Richard T. Ely Papers (Madison, Wis.: Wisconsin State Historical Society). The same letter appears in a number of other collections.Google Scholar
52. Hockett, John A. The Determination of Major Social Problems of American Life (New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1927).Google Scholar
53. Meltzer, Hyman Children's Social Concepts (New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1925).Google Scholar
54. Billings, Neal A Determination of Generalizations Basic to the Social Studies Curriculum (Baltimore: Warwick and York, 1929).Google Scholar
55. Rugg, Earle U. Curriculum Studies in the Social Sciences and Citizenship (Greeley: Colorado State Teachers College, Tribune-Republican Publishing Company, 1928).Google Scholar
56. Mathews, Chester O. The Grade Placement of Curriculum Materials in the Social Studies (New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1926).Google Scholar
57. Shaffer, Laurence F. Children's Interpretations of Cartoons (New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1930).Google Scholar
58. Rugg, Harold O. and Hockett, John A., Objective Studies in Map Locations (New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1926).Google Scholar
59. Washburne, John N. “An Experimental Study of Various Graphic, Tabular and Textual Methods of Presenting Quantitative Material,” Journal of Educational Psychology, September-October 1927.Google Scholar
60. Washburne, John N. “The Use of Questions in Social Science Material,” Journal of Educational Psychology, May 1929.Google Scholar
61. Shaffer, Laurence F. “A Learning Experiment in Social Studies,” Journal of Educational Psychology, December 1927.Google Scholar
62. Rugg, That Men May Understand, p. 221.Google Scholar
63. Ibid., p. 222.Google Scholar
64. Rugg, Building a Science of Society for the Schools, p. 11; see also Appendix B.Google Scholar
65. Rugg, That Men May Understand, p. 223.Google Scholar
66. Interviews with Mr. Henry Halvorson and John Kenerson, Boston, Massachusetts, December 20-21, 1966.Google Scholar
67. The twelve pamphlets were combined into six volumes of over six hundred pages each and published under the series title Man and His Changing Society. The individual volumes were as follows: Vol. I, An Introduction to American Civilization, 1929; Vol. II, Changing Civilizations in the Modern World, 1930; Vol. III, A History of American Civilization, 1930; Vol. IV, A History of American Government and Culture, 1931; Vol. V, An Introduction to the Problems of American Culture, 1931; Vol. VI, Changing Governments and Changing Cultures, 1932. The entire series was revised under new titles starting in 1937.Google Scholar
68. Rugg, That Men May Understand, pp. 223–24.Google Scholar
69. Sales figures furnished the author by Dr. Ronald Edgerton, Social Studies Editor, Ginn and Company, Boston, November 22, 1965.Google Scholar
70. Ibid. Google Scholar
71. Interview with Mr. Frank Moran, Madison, Wisconsin, February 11, 1966.Google Scholar
72. Rugg, Building a Science of Society for the Schools, p. 29.Google Scholar
73. Rugg, That Men May Understand, pp. 40–47.Google Scholar
74. Graham, Patricia A History of the Progressive Education Association, 1919-1955 (unpublished doctoral dissertation, Russell Library, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1964). Mark Phillips, The Seven Arts and Harold Rugg (unpublished Master's thesis, Columbia University, 1961). Mary Louise Seguel, The Shaping of a Field of Specialization, Curriculum Making: A Critical Study of Selected Writings of Charles and Frank McMurry, Franklin Bobbitt, W. W. Charters, Harold Rugg, Hollis Caswell and John Dewey, (Doctoral dissertation, Russell Library, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1964), Kenneth J. Simpson, The Rugg Textbook Controversy (unpublished Master's thesis, University of Wisconsin, 1966).Google Scholar