Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:57:58.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Introduction of the “New Education” in Queensland, Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

Peter Meadmore
Peter Meadmore*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education at the Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Reformist educational discourses of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, usually referred to as the “new education” or progressive education, emanated from the industrialized countries of the United States and Western Europe. They emerged partly as a response to social and economic conditions but also as an attempt by educationists to ameliorate the regimentation and pedagogical limitations of nineteenth-century schooling. A considerable degree of cross-pollination of ideas across different countries occurred through visits, study, and the exchange of publications between educationists, allowing an international focus to emerge. The various discourses that constituted progressive education were at times confusing, even contradictory, and the use of these umbrella-type categories masked and distorted the diversity of pedagogical practices. These discourses also found their way into the Southern Hemisphere including British colonies such as Australia.

Type
Articles
Information
History of Education Quarterly , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , Fall 2003 , pp. 372 - 392
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 by the History of Education Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The term ‘the new education’ was used in Australia at the turn of the twentieth century as a label for the reformist educational discourses included in the term “progressive education.”Google Scholar

2 Rohrs, H. “Internationalism in Progressive Education and Initial Steps towards a World Education Movement,“ in Progressive Education Across the Continents: A Handbook eds. Rohrs, H. and Lenhart, V. (Berlin: Peter Lang, 1995), 15.Google Scholar

3 This paper addresses the introduction, as opposed to the implementation, of a reformist syllabus in Queensland in 1905. It is not possible to assess the effects of the 1905 syllabus due to the complete lack of studies in this area.Google Scholar

As a point of clarification, in the Australian context, the word state has two meanings. It can refer to a particular level of government, State government or Federal government, or to the abstract concept of ‘the state’ as opposed to the private sector of industry and enterprise. In this paper State indicates the various Australian States (Victoria, etc.).Google Scholar

4 Beattie, Nicholas “Contextual Preconditions of ‘Open Schooling': The English Case in Historical and Comparative Perspectives,“ Cambridge Journal of Education 27: 1 (1997): 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Ibid.Google Scholar

6 See Reese, William J. “The Origins of Progressive Education,“ History of Education Quarterly 41 (Spring 2001): 1–24.Google Scholar

7 Selleck, R. J. W. The New Education: the English Background 1810–1914 (London: Pitman, 1968), 336.Google Scholar

8 Cremin, Lawrence A. The Transformation of the School: Progressivism in American Education, 1816–1951 (New York: Knopf, 1961), x.Google Scholar

9 Cohen, Sol “The Influence of Progressive Education on School Reform in the U.S.A.,“ in Progressive Education Across the Continents: a Handbook eds. Rohrs, H. and Lenhart, V. (Berlin: Peter Lang, 1995), 321.Google Scholar

10 Kliebard, Herbert M. The Struggle for the American Curriculum 1893–1958 (New York: Routledge, 1986); idem., Forging the American Curriculum: Essays in Curriculum History and Theory (New York: Routledge, 1992); idem., “Constructing the Concept of Curriculum on the Wisconsin Frontier,” History of Education 25:2 (1996) 123–139.Google Scholar

11 Zilversmit, Arthur Changing Schools: Progressive Education Theory and Practice: 1930–1960 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).Google Scholar

12 Ibid., 2.Google Scholar

13 Ibid.Google Scholar

14 Hyams, B. K. “Cyril Jackson and the Introduction of the New Education in Western Australia,“ in Pioneers of Australian Education, Volume 2 ed. Turney, C. (Sydney: Sydney University Press, 1972), 250.Google Scholar

15 Rodwell, G. W. With Zealous Efficiency: Progressivism and Tasmanian State Primary Schools 1900–1920 (Darwin: William Michael Press, 1992), 67.Google Scholar

16 Selleck, R. J. W. Frank Tate: A Biography (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1982), 112.Google Scholar

17 Crane, A. R. and Walker, W. G. Peter Board: His Contribution to the Development of Education in New South Wales (Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research, 1957).Google Scholar

18 Selleck, R. J. W. Hyams, B. K. and Campbell, E. M. “The Directors—F. Tate, W. T. McCoy and S. H. Smith,“ in Pioneers of Australian Education: Volume 3 ed. Turney, 50.Google Scholar

19 Selleck, See The New Education, 24–69.Google Scholar

20 See Butts, R. Freeman and Cremin, Lawrence. A. A History of Education in American Culture (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1953), 176–179; Selleck, The New Education, 45; Kliebard, The Struggle for the American Curriculum, 4–7.Google Scholar

21 See Lamberti, Marjorie “Radical Schoolteachers and the Origins of the Progressive Education Movement in Germany, 1900–1914,“ History of Education Quarterly 40 (Spring 2000): 22–48.Google Scholar

22 Cruikshank, Kate in her review of Peter Metz, Herbartianism as a Paradigm for Professional and School Reform (Bern: Peter Lang, 1992) has drawn attention to a similar dissatisfaction with “the catechetical mode of teaching” in Germany. See History of Education Quarterly 36 (Fall 1996): 336. In a study of teachers in Queensland one-room schools in the period 1920–50, a common complaint of school inspectors in their annual report was that teachers continued to use the question and answer catechetical form of teaching. Associated with an instrumentary educational approach, the inspectors described it as being “mechanical” and “un-intellectual.” See Meadmore, Peter “Hard Times, Expedient Measures: Women Teachers in Queensland Rural Schools, 1920–50,” History of Education 28:4 (1999): 435–447.Google Scholar

23 Selleck, The New Education, 47.Google Scholar

24 Prior to the establishment of strict political party discipline, governments in Queensland were often short lived. As a result of this, permanent senior public servants such as Anderson and Ewart accumulated considerable power, as the ministerial incumbent usually did not have time to become familiar with his portfolio before being replaced as the result of a change of government.Google Scholar

25 Logan, Greg “'Grey Eminence’ in the Treasury Buildings; David Ewart and Educational Reform in Queensland: 1888–1897,“ The Educational Historian 2: 2 (1989): iii.Google Scholar

26 Queensland State Archives, memorandum, 19 August 1890, Agriculture Various, 1889–1890, RSI 12347-1-132.Google Scholar

27 A Royal Commission into the Queensland Civil Service in 1887 found Anderson and Ewart to have acted in “an arbitrary, capricious and unfeeling manner” and that they failed to keep up with educational developments in other Colonies or in other parts of the world. See Greg Logan, “Soldiers of the Service: J. G. Anderson and David Ewart,” in Soldiers of the Service: Some Early Queensland Educators and their Schools eds. Greg Logan and Tom Watson (Brisbane: History of Queensland Education Society, 1992); idem., “‘Grey Eminence’ in the Treasury Buildings;” John Lawry, “Understanding Australian Education 1901 to 1914,” in Australian Education in the Twentieth Century eds John Cleverley and John Lawry (Melbourne: Longman, 1972); Ezra Wyeth, Education in Queensland (Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research, n.d. [1955].Google Scholar

28 Brisbane Courier, 8 January 1903.Google Scholar

29 Ibid., 26 January 1904.Google Scholar

30 Votes and Proceedings, Queensland Legislative Assembly, 1904, Report of Convention.Google Scholar

31 Spaull, Andrew and Sullivan, Martin A History of the Queensland Teachers’ Union (Sydney: Allen and Unwin, 1989), 102.Google Scholar

32 Brisbane Courier, 30 January 1904.Google Scholar

33 Queensland, Annual Report of the Secretary for Public Instruction, 1903 (Brisbane: Queensland Government, [1904]), 54.Google Scholar

34 Ibid., 1903, 55.Google Scholar

35 Ibid., 1904, 23.Google Scholar

36 Cole, P. R. “New South Wales,“ in Education in Australia: A Comparative Study of the Educational Systems in Six Australian States ed. Browne, G. S. (London: Macmillan, 1927), 19.Google Scholar

37 Ibid.Google Scholar

38 New South Wales, Department of Public Instruction, “The New Syllabus of Instruction-Preface,” New South Wales Educational Gazette (March 1904): 234. See Spaull and Sullivan, A History of the Queensland Teachers’ Union, 102–103; L. A. Mandelson, “Australian Primary Education, 1919–1939: A Study of Inertia, Continuity and Change in State Controlled Schooling” (Ph.D. diss., University of Sydney, 1974), 13.Google Scholar

39 Crane, A. R. “The Development of State-controlled Education in New South Wales: 1900 to 1922,” (M.Ed. diss., University of Melbourne, 1949), 29.Google Scholar

40 Ibid., 26.Google Scholar

41 Queensland, Department of Public Instruction, Schedule 14, Preface to Syllabus of Instruction: Course of Instruction for Each Class (Brisbane: Queensland Government, 1904), 201.Google Scholar

42 Ibid., 202.Google Scholar

43 Ibid., 200.Google Scholar

44 Board, P. Report Upon Observations and Enquiries made with regard to Primary Education in Other Countries (Sydney: NSW Government Printer, 1903), 4.Google Scholar

45 Ibid., 6.Google Scholar

46 Connell, W. F. A History of Education in the Twentieth Century World (Canberra: Curriculum Development Centre, 1980), 64.Google Scholar

47 Queensland, Department of Public Instruction, Preface to Syllabus, 200.Google Scholar

48 Dunt, L. Speaking Worlds: The Australian Educator and John Dewey 1890–1940 (Melbourne: History Department, University of Melbourne, 1993), 7.Google Scholar

49 Ibid., 7. Dunt cites: W. G. Gates, “The Theory of Concentration,” Australian Schoolmaster and Literary Review, 18:21(1897): 229–230; S. Lasker, “Address on ‘Herbart',” Australian Journal of Education [hereafter AJE], 1:3 (1903): 16–19 and 1:4 (1903): 3–4; S. H. Smith, “Modern Educational Ideals,” AJE, 3:5 (1905): 11.Google Scholar

50 Connell, A History of Education in the Twentieth Century, 64.Google Scholar

51 Ibid., 65.Google Scholar

52 Ibid.Google Scholar

53 Selleck, The New Education, 252.Google Scholar

54 Queensland, Department of Public Instruction, Preface to Syllabus, 200.Google Scholar

55 Ibid., 202.Google Scholar

56 Connell, A History of Education in the Twentieth Century, 65.Google Scholar

57 Crane and Walker, Peter Board, 37.Google Scholar

58 Parker, F. Talks on Teaching (New York: Kellogg, 1893), 34.Google Scholar

59 Department of Public Instruction, NSW, Conference of Inspectors, Teachers, Departmental Officers and Prominent Educationalists (Sydney: Government Printer, 1904), 113.Google Scholar

60 Queensland, Department of Public Instruction, Preface to Syllabus, 201.Google Scholar

61 Ibid., 202.Google Scholar

62 Ibid.Google Scholar

63 Cohen, “The Influence of Progressive Education on School Reform in the USA,“ 324–326.Google Scholar

64 Queensland, Department of Public Instruction, Preface to Syllabus, 202.Google Scholar

65 Ibid.Google Scholar

66 Ibid., 203.Google Scholar

67 Ibid.Google Scholar

68 Queensland, Annual Report, 1904 23.Google Scholar

69 Wyeth, Education in Queensland, 157.Google Scholar

70 Queensland, Annual Report, 1904 23.Google Scholar

71 Zilversmit, Changing Schools, 21.Google Scholar

72 New South Wales Educational Gazette, 13:12 (1904): 286.Google Scholar

73 Marks, E. N. “John Shirley,“ in Australian Dictionary of Biography, Volume 11 (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1988), 598–599. The University of Sydney awarded Shirley a doctorate in science in 1912.Google Scholar

74 Queensland, Annual Report, 1904 23.Google Scholar

75 Ibid., 24.Google Scholar

76 Hyams, B. and Bessant, B. Schools for the People? An Introduction to the History of State Education in Australia (Melbourne: Longman, 1972), 87.Google Scholar

77 Turney, C. ed. Sources in the History of Australian Education: 1788–1970 (Sydney: Sydney University Press, 1972), 90.Google Scholar

78 Beattie, “Contextual Preconditions of ‘Open Education.'“Google Scholar