Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:48:19.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

History and Educational Reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

Extract

The history of school reform has continuously fascinated historians of education, but their study of the subject has acquired a new urgency in the last quarter of a century as national political discussions have given an increasingly important place to educational policy. The recent publication of Tinkering toward Utopia: A Century of Public School Reform (Harvard University Press, 1995), by David Tyack and Larry Cuban, offers the latest comprehensive study of the subject. We have invited four distinguished scholars to comment on the book. They are Robert L. Hampel of the University of Delaware, William R. Johnson of the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, David N. Plank of Michigan State University, and Diane Ravitch of the Brookings Institute. Professors Tyack and Cuban have, in turn, agreed to respond to the comments.

Type
Forum
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the History of Education Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Flexner, Abraham, I Remember: The Autobiography of Abraham Flexner (New York, 1940), 399.Google Scholar

2 Muncey, Donna E. and McQuillan, Patrick J., “Education Reform as Revitalization Movement,” American Journal of Education 10 (Aug. 1993): 424.Google Scholar

3 Kammeraad-Campbell, Susan, DOC: The Story of Dennis Littky and His Fight for a Better School (Chicago, 1989); Meier, Deborah, The Power of Their Ideas: Lessons for America from a Small School in Harlem (Boston, 1995); Fried, Robert L., The Passionate Teacher: A Practical Guide (Boston, 1995).Google Scholar

4 Holton, Gerald and Goroff, Daniel, “Where is American Education Going? Report on a Convocation,” Daedalus 124 (fall 1995): 4.Google Scholar

5 Graham, Patricia Albjerg, S.O.S.: Sustain our Schools (New York, 1992); Lazerson, Marvin et al., An Education of Value: The Purposes and Practices of Schools (Cambridge, Eng., 1985); Ravitch, Diane, The Schools We Deserve: Reflections on the Educational Crises of Our Times (New York, 1985); Cremin, Lawrence, Popular Education and Its Discontents (New York, 1990); and Sizer, Theodore R., Places for Learning, Places for Joy: Speculations on American School Reform (Cambridge, Mass., 1973).Google Scholar

6 Hofstadter, Richard, Anti-Intellectualism in American Life (New York, 1963); Bestor, Arthur E., Educational Wastelands: The Retreat from Learning in Our Public Schools (Urbana, 1953); Barzun, Jacques, The House of Intellect (New York, 1959).Google Scholar

7 Puckett, John L., Foxfire Reconsidered: A Twenty-Year Experiment in Progressive Education (Urbana, 1989), chs. 2–4; Wigginton, Eliot, Sometimes a Shining Moment: The Foxfire Experiment (Garden City, N.Y., 1985), 138, 159.Google Scholar

1 The Holmes Group, Tomorrow's Schools of Education: A Report of the Holmes Group (East Lansing, Mich., 1995), 9.Google Scholar

2 The information on Baltimore's history is taken from my work-in-progress tentatively titled Teachers, Politics, and Reform: Baltimore's Elementary Schools, 1830–1915. Google Scholar

3 Rice, Joseph Mayer, “Our Public School System: Evils in Baltimore,” The Forum (Oct. 1892): 145–58. The articles ran in nine consecutive issues from October through June, 1893, and were subsequently republished as The Public School System of the United States (New York, 1893).Google Scholar

4 David B. Young, a colleague at UMBC, has suggested this alternative. I would also like to thank the following persons for helping to fill my own workshop with interesting ideas: at UMBC, Professor E. Wendy Saul, and graduate assistants Cass Mairs, Loris Nebbia, and Paul van Rijn; in the public schools, Jackie Sisco, Donna Dieckman, and Mary Beth Johnson.Google Scholar

1 Many of the reforms that Tyack and Cuban like best came about neither from the inside out nor from the bottom up but from the top down, imposed upon reluctant educators and recalcitrant communities by federal judges and other policy elites. Attempts to accomplish social and economic objectives through the schools hardly began with the tribunes of economic competitiveness.Google Scholar

2 In Michigan, for example, the goals behind sweeping changes in the educational system over the past four years have been to reduce taxes, to weaken the power of unions, and to placate parents and other constituencies alienated from the public schools. “Helping students learn better” may or may not be a by-product of these reforms, but it was distinctly not their main objective.Google Scholar

1 Tyack, David and Cuban, Larry, Tinkering toward Utopia: A Century of Public School Reform (Cambridge, Mass., 1995), 134, 135, 140.Google Scholar

2 Tyack, David B., The One Best System: A History of American Urban Education (Cambridge, Mass., 1974), 4; Tyack, David B. and Hansot, Elisabeth, Managers of Virtue: Public School Leadership in America, 1820–1980 (New York, 1982), 129–67; Tyack, David, “The Kingdom of God and the Common School: Protestant Ministers and the Educational Awakening in the West,” Harvard Educational Review 36 (fall 1966): 447–69.Google Scholar

3 Chubb, John E. and Moe, Terry M., Politics, Markets, and America's Schools (Washington, D.C., 1990).Google Scholar

4 Sebring, Penny Bender, Bryk, Anthony S., and Easton, John Q., Charting Reform: Chicago Teachers Take Stock (Chicago, 1995), 4749.Google Scholar

5 Teske, Paul, “School Choice, Low-Income Parents, and Information Gathering” (paper presented at the Spencer Foundation Post-Doctoral Forum/National Academy of Education Meeting, Cambridge, Mass., 26 October 1995), 22.Google Scholar

1 Bailyn, Bernard, On the Teaching and Writing of History: Responses to a Series of Questions (Hanover, N.H., 1994), 12.Google Scholar

1 Elmore, Richard F. and McLaughlin, Milbrey Wallin make this point in Steady Work: Policy, Practice, and the Reform of Education (Santa Monica, Calif., 1988).Google Scholar

2 Neustadt, Richard E. and May, Ernest R., Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for Decision-makers (New York, 1986); Silver, Harold, Education, Change, and the Policy Process (New York, 1990).Google Scholar

3 Tyack, David, The One Best System: The History of Urban Education (Cambridge, Mass., 1974); Powell, Arthur G., Farrar, Eleanor, and Cohen, David K., The Shopping Mall High School: Winners and Losers (Boston, 1985); Krug, Edward A., The Shaping of the American High School, vol. 1 (New York, 1964); Callahan, Raymond E., Education and the Cult of Efficiency: A Study of the Social Forces That Have Shaped the Administration of the Public Schools (Chicago, 1962).Google Scholar

4 National Center for Education Statistics, “Overview of Public Elementary and Secondary Schools and Districts: School Year 1993–1994,” (NCES 95–799), Sept. 1995, p. 7; National Center for Education Statistics, “Public School Student, Staff, and Graduate Counts by State, School Year 1993–94,” May 1995, table 3.Google Scholar

5 Fullan, Michael, The New Meaning of Educational Change (New York, 1991); Goodman, Jesse, “Change without Difference: School Restructuring in Historical Perspective,” Harvard Educational Review 65 (1995): 1–29; Newmann, Fred, School Restructuring and Student Learning (San Francisco, 1996); Elmore, Richard F., “Structural Reform and Educational Practice,” Educational Researcher 24 (Dec. 1995): 23–26.Google Scholar

6 Ravitch, Diane and Vinovskis, Maris, eds., Learning from the Past: What History Teaches Us about School Reform (Baltimore, 1995), 185–87.Google Scholar

7 Ravitch, Diane, National Standards in American Education—A Citizen's Guide (Washington, D.C., 1995), 177.Google Scholar