¹ Gleason, Philip, Contending With Modernity: Catholic Higher Education in the Twentieth Century (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995), 235.Google Scholar

² “The Postwar Responsibilities of Liberal Education: Report of the Committee on the Re-Statement of the Nature and Aims of Liberal Education to the Commission on Liberal Education of the Association of American Colleges” [Hereafter AAC Report], Association of American Colleges Bulletin 29:2 (May 1943): 275-299; A Committee Appointed by the American Council of Learned Societies, Theodore M. Greene, chairman, Liberal Education Re-Examined: Its Role in a Democracy (New York, London: Harper & Brothers, 1943); Harvard University, Committee on the Objectives of a General Education in a Free Society, General Education in a Free Society: Report of the Harvard Committee. With an introduction by James Bryant Conant (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1945); The Cooperative Study in General Education, Cooperation in General Education: A Final Report of the Executive Committee of the Cooperative Study in General Education (Washington, DC: American Council on Education, 1947); President's Commission on Higher Education, Higher Education for American Democracy: A Report of The President's Commission on Higher Education, 6 vol. (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1947-48); hereafter HEFAD, with the volume indicated by roman numeral. Gleason refers to “an avalanche of writings on the liberal arts and what came to be called ‘general education'”; Contending with Modernity, 247.Google Scholar

³ HEFAD I, 92, 7.Google Scholar

⁴ On the Commission's enduring impact, see Philo Hutcheson, “The 1947 President's Commission on Higher Education and the National Rhetoric on Higher Education Policy,” History of Higher Education Annual 22, (2002): 91-109.Google Scholar

⁵ HEFAD VI, 20.Google Scholar

⁶ Dewey, John, A Common Faith (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1934); cf. John Herman Randall, “The Religion of Shared Experience,” in Sidney Ratner, ed., The Philosopher of the Common Man: Essays in Honor of John Dewey to Celebrate His Eightieth Birthday (New York, G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1940): 106-145.Google Scholar

⁷ Dewey, John, “Religion and Our Schools,” in Joseph Ratner, ed., Education Today (New York: G.P. Putnam and Sons, 1940), 78, 84.Google Scholar

⁸ Purcell, Edward A., The Crisis of Democratic Theory: Scientific Naturalism and the Problem of Value (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1973).Google Scholar

⁹ Kerr-Tener, Janet Cecile, “From Truman to Johnson: Ad-Hoc Policy Formation in Higher Education” (PhD diss., University of Virginia, 1985), 55, 57, 59. The OWMR consolidated two earlier agencies and existed from October 3, 1944, to December 12, 1946. http://www.archives.gov/research/guide-fed-records/groups/250.html Google Scholar

¹⁰ Kerr-Tener, , “From Truman to Johnson,” 57, 69.Google Scholar

¹¹ Ibid., 60.Google Scholar

¹² Ibid., 66.Google Scholar

¹³ Ibid., 67.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Hutcheson, Philo A., “Zook, George Frederick,” American National Biography online; Kerr-Tener, “From Truman to Johnson,” 68. As Commissioner, Zook appeared on the cover of TIME, 9/18/1933.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Zook, George F., The Role of the Federal Government in Education (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1945), 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁶ Kerr-Tener, , “From Truman to Johnson,” 71-72. Kerr-Tener portrays Roosevelt as a champion of public higher education and mentions her “notorious battle with Cardinal Spellman over the 1949 aid to education bill,” in which Roosevelt opposed federal aid to Catholic schools and Spellman accused Roosevelt of anti-Catholic discrimination. See also Philip A. Grant Jr., “Catholic Congressmen, Cardinal Spellman, Eleanor Roosevelt and the 1949-1950 Federal Aid to Education Controversy,” American Catholic Historical Society of Philadelphia Records 90 (1979): 3-13.Google Scholar

¹⁷ HEFAD V, 5.Google Scholar

¹⁸ On McGuire, see “In Memoriam: Dr. Jan Willem Philip Borleffs and Professor Martin McGuire,” Vigiliae Christianae 24, no. 1 (1970): 1-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁹ Hochwalt, Frederick G. to Brother Emilian, F.S.C., Ammendale Normal Institute, Maryland, n.d.; National Catholic Education Association (NCEA) Records, American Catholic History Research Center, Folder: “Committee—To Analyze the Report of the President's Commission on Higher Education.” For the dissent see HEFAD V, 65-68.Google Scholar

²⁰ HEFAD V, 66. Interestingly, Dewey had anticipated this criticism before the war. In recommending a “national” system of education for the United States, he distinguished it from a “nationalistic” system such as those found in Germany, Italy, Japan, and the U.S.S.R. “Toward a National System of Education,” Social Frontier 2 (June 1935).Google Scholar

²¹ Blanshard, Paul, American Freedom and Catholic Power (Boston: Beacon Press, 1949).Google Scholar

²² Wickey, Gould, “The President Studies Higher Education,” Christian Education 31, no. 1 (March 1948): 100.Google Scholar

²³ Ibid., 102.Google Scholar

²⁴ Hollinshead, Byron S., “The Report of the President's Commission on Higher Education,” American Association of University Professors Bulletin 34 (1948): 268. On Hollinshead see Anita Fay Kravitz, “The Harvard Report of 1945: An Historical Ethnography” (PhD diss., University of Pennsylvania, 1994), 117, 142-144.Google Scholar

²⁵ Reprinted in The Christian Century 65, no. 3 (January 21, 1948): 79-82.Google Scholar

²⁶ The ACLS discerned “various forces in American culture, and trends in American education, which threaten[ed] the very basis of all scholarship”; these threats prompted it to call the committee. ACLS Committee, Liberal Education Re-examined, vii.Google Scholar

²⁷ Ibid., 29.Google Scholar

²⁸ HEFAD I, 49. On previous eras see Roberts, Jon B. and Turner, James, The Sacred and the Secular University (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000); George M. Marsden, The Soul of the American University: From Protestant Establishment to Established Non-Belief (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994); Mark A. Noll, Princeton and the Republic, 1768-1822: The Search for a Christian Enlightenment in the Era of Samuel Stanhope Smith (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989); Laurence R. Veysey, The Emergence of the American University (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965).Google Scholar

²⁹ HEFAD I, 49.Google Scholar

³⁰ Thomas, Russell, The Search for a Common Learning: General Education 1800-1960 (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962); Gary E. Miller, The Meaning of General Education: The Emergence of a Curriculum Paradigm (New York: Teacher's College Press, 1988). The Commission briefly noted the movement, mentioning that “attempts to reach conclusions about the ends and means of general education have been a major part of debate and experimentation in higher education for at least two decades.” HEFAD I, 49.Google Scholar

³¹ Miller, , The Meaning of General Education, chapters 3 and 4; William P. Martin, “The Dewey-Hutchins Debate on General Education, 1929 to 1945: A Case of Progressive Historical Bias” (EdD diss., Temple University, 1991). For Hutchins’ approach see his The Higher Learning in America (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1936), esp. chap. III. On the intellectual lineage of the Hutchins camp, see Anne H. Stevens, “The Philosophy of General Education and Its Contradictions: The Influence of Hutchins,” Journal of General Education 50, no. 3 (2001): 165-191.Google Scholar

³² HEFAD I, 49.Google Scholar

³³ Ibid., 50-57.Google Scholar

³⁴ Ibid., 53.Google Scholar

³⁵ Ibid., 49.Google Scholar

³⁶ Ibid., 59.Google Scholar

³⁷ The “general course” arose in the 1920s. During that decade, according to Thomas, “For the first time since Eliot [introduced his] elective principle, an intensive and concerted effort was made to review the idea of liberal education and to take constructive measures for restoring to the curriculum and integrity and a breadth of learning which had long been absent.” Thomas, The Search for a Common Learning, 69.Google Scholar

³⁸ HEFAD I, 59.Google Scholar

³⁹ Ibid., 60.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Ibid., 61.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Ibid., 14. For Dewey's views see his The School and Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1900).Google Scholar

⁴² HEFAD I, 49, 62. Even as it made a seemingly clear statement of the difference between general education and liberal education, the Commission conflated the two, referring once to a “liberal general education.”Google Scholar

⁴³ ACLS Committee, Liberal Education Re-examined, vii.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ AAC Report, 275.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Ibid., 277.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ “Minutes of the Executive Committee Meeting” of the NCEA Higher Education Department, June 16-17, 1943, Buffalo NY, College Newsletter Supplement 6:4 (May 1943): 2. It is not clear how minutes of a June meeting appeared in a May newsletter. Most likely the newsletter did not actually appear until after the June meeting despite its May date.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Association of American Colleges Commission on Liberal Education, “Report of Commission on Liberal Education,” Association of American Colleges Bulletin 35 (1949): 162.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ On McConnell's importance for the Commission's concept of general education, see John Young Reid, transcript of interviews with Dr. Earl James McGrath [another important Commission member who shaped its concept of general education, and founding editor of the Journal of General Education], February-November 1977, Part 7, 32, University of Arizona Library.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ “The Official Records, Minutes of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association of American Colleges, January 10-12, 1949, Hotel Commodore, New York City,” Ibid., 183.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ “Minutes of the Executive Committee Meeting,” 2.Google Scholar

⁵¹ AAC Report, 286-287.Google Scholar

⁵² On liberal culture see Veysey, Emergence.Google Scholar

⁵³ ACLS Committee, Liberal Education Re-examined, 70-78.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Whelan, James F., ed., Catholic Colleges of the United States of America at the Middle of the Twentieth Century: A Compilation of Information Submitted by Constituent Members of the Department of Colleges and Universities, National Catholic Educational Association, on the Questionnaires of the Committee on Membership (New Orleans: Bookstore, Loyola University, 1952), 120.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Westbrook, Robert B., John Dewey and American Democracy (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991), 371-373.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Tanner, Daniel, Crusade for Democracy: Progressive Education at the Crossroads (Albany: SUNY Press, 1991), 105-106. Prominent President's Commission member George Stoddard was also a founding member of the Dewey Society.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ HEFAD I, 11. The Commission regularly referred to “democracy as a way of life,” a common mantra among certain intellectuals in the 1940s; Ibid., 102. See for example Fred W. Beuttler, “Organizing an American Conscience: The Conference on Science, Philosophy, and Religion, 1940-68” (PhD diss., University of Chicago, 1995). T.V. Smith encouraged the “way of life” terminology in The Democratic Way of Life (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1926), a book that Dewey lauded; see Dewey, The Public and Its Problems (New York: H. Holt and Company, 1927), 147n.1.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Dewey, John, Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education (New York: Macmillan, 1916), 101; cf. The Public and Its Problems, 143.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ HEFAD I, 102,8, 5.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Dewey, Democracy and Education, 115.Google Scholar

⁶¹ Ibid., 100.Google Scholar

⁶² HEFAD I, 102.Google Scholar

⁶³ Ibid., 13, 11.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Ibid., 11.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Ibid., 5, 13.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Ibid., 102.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Ibid., 14.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Ibid., 50.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Ibid., 14.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Higher education would be the finishing school because the Deweyan concept of democracy already permeated the K-12 public school system. Lawrence A. Cremin, The Transformation of the School: Progressivism in American Education, 1876-1957 (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1961).Google Scholar

⁷¹ A group of Catholic educators who attended the NCEA meeting did publish a short pamphlet-style book; Allan P. Farrell, ed., Whither American Education? The Report of the President's Commission on Higher Education (New York: The America Press, 1948).Google Scholar

⁷² Postcard signed by Hochwalt, Folder: “Committee-To Analyze the Report of the President's Commission on Higher Education,” NCEA records.Google Scholar

⁷³ Hochwalt, to John, A. Elbert, S.M., University of Dayton philosophy professor, March 5, 1948, Folder: “Committee-To Analyze the Report of the President's Commission on Higher Education,” NCEA records.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Rooney, Edward B. to Hochwalt, , March 20, 1948, Folder: “Committee-To Analyze the Report of the President's Commission on Higher Education,” NCEA Records.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Farrell, , ed., Whither American Education? 15.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Ibid., 16.Google Scholar

⁷⁷ Ibid., 15.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Farrell, Allan P., “Report of the President's Commission: A Critical Appraisal,” in Gail Kennedy, ed., Education for Democracy: The Debate over the Report of the President's Committee on Higher Education (Boston: D.C. Heath and Company, 1952), 102.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ Wickey, , “The President Studies Higher Education,” 98.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ Hollinshead, Byron, “Which Way Salvation,” AAC Bulletin 29:3 (October 1943): 389.Google Scholar

⁸¹ ACLS Committee, Liberal Education Re-examined, 39.Google Scholar

⁸² Ibid., 23, 43.Google Scholar

⁸³ Ibid., 38.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ Ibid., 43.Google Scholar

⁸⁵ Ibid., 37.Google Scholar

⁸⁶ Greene, Theodore M., “Christianity and Its Secular Alternatives,” in Henry Van Dusen, ed., Christian Answer (London: Nisbet and Co., 1946), 84, 87. At this late stage of Dewey's life, Hook was significantly involved in helping Dewey prepare letters and manuscripts. Martin, “Dewey-Hutchins Debate,” 217-218.Google Scholar

⁸⁷ Ibid., 89.Google Scholar

⁸⁸ Greene, Theodore M., The Basic Tenets of a Liberal Christian Theology (Henderson Home Report Service, 1949), 3.Google Scholar

⁸⁹ Ibid., 15, 16, 19.Google Scholar

⁹⁰ Ibid., 3.Google Scholar

⁹¹ Ibid., 11.Google Scholar

⁹² Kerr, Clark, The Uses of the University (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1963), 20.Google Scholar

⁹³ HEFAD I, 14.Google Scholar

⁹⁴ Ibid., 94.Google Scholar

⁹⁵ Ibid., 91.Google Scholar

⁹⁶ Ibid., 92.Google Scholar

⁹⁷ In Pierce v. Society of Sisters 268 US 510 (1925), which invalidated Oregon's Compulsory Education Act of 1922 that required parents to send children only to public schools, the unanimous Supreme Court held that “the fundamental liberty upon which all governments in this Union repose excludes any general power of the State to standardize its children by forcing them to accept instruction from public teachers only.”Google Scholar