Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:12:29.433Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Caught between Common Sense and Science: The Cornell Child Study Clubs, 1925–45

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

Julia Grant
Julia Grant*
Affiliation:
James Madison College, Michigan State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A 1930 report of a rural New York Child Study Club meeting conveys the dubiousness with which many mothers have regarded using books to raise babies. In the words of the group's secretary: “One mother, at a certain point in the discussion, quoted, half in fun, the much-abused ‘Spare the rod and spoil the child,’ adding, That's in the book.’ (We have had quite a bit of fun about things being or not being ‘in the book.”) ‘Oh, but that's in the old Book,’ some made answer, and to that another said, ‘I guess you have to mix the two!”” This ironic dialog highlights women's ambivalence and confusion about the use of the “book” in child-rearing and about the sources of expert advice which have contended for authority in the child-rearing enterprise. Before the twentieth century, mothers who raised “baby by the book” were often ridiculed, with the assumption being that the care of children constituted common knowledge; however, in this century, middle-class mothers have avidly consumed child-rearing manuals. American parents have been inundated with baby books, from the free Infant Care pamphlets dispensed by the U.S. Children's Bureau in the early decades of the century to Dr. Benjamin Spock's 35-cent paperback Baby and Child Care, which was distributed to millions of mothers by physicians and nurses in the 1940s and 1950s.

Type
Articles
Information
History of Education Quarterly , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , Winter 1994 , pp. 433 - 452
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the History of Education Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Sound Avenue Child Study Club Notebook, 10 Jan. 1930, Suffolk County 1929–30, Archives, Margaret Wylie Division of Rare and Manuscript Collections, Cornell University Library, Ithaca, N.Y. [hereafter referred to as MW].Google Scholar

2 Weiss, Nancy Pottishman “Mother, the Invention of Necessity: Dr. Benjamin Spock's Baby and Child Care ,” American Quarterly 29 (Winter 1977): 519–46.Google Scholar

3 On parent education, see Schlossman, Steven L. “Philanthropy and the Gospel of Child Development,“ History of Education Quarterly 21 (Fall 1981): 275–99; and idem, “Before Home Start: Notes toward a History of Parent Education in America, 1897–1929,” Harvard Educational Review 46 (Aug. 1976): 436–67. See also Cravens, Hamilton “Child-Saving in the Age of Professionalism, 1915–30,” in American Childhood: A Research Guide and Historical Handbook, ed. Hawes, Joseph M. and Hiner, N. Ray (Westport, Conn., 1985), 415–81. On the Child Study Association of America, see Roberta Wollons, “Women Educating Women: The Child Study Association as Women's Culture,” in Changing Education: Women as Radicals and Conservators, ed. Antler, Joyce and Biklen, Sari Knopp (Albany, N.Y., 1990), 51–67. Parts of this essay are extracted from my forthcoming book, Raising Baby by the Book: The Education of American Parents, 1800–1960 (New Haven, Conn.).Google Scholar

4 Earlier scholarship, such as Ehrenreich, Barbara and English's, Deirdre For Her Own Good: 150 Years of the Experts’ Advice to Women (Garden City, N.Y., 1979), has tended to assume that there is a relationship between expert advice and women's behavior. Mechling, Jay E. chastises historians for assuming that there is a relationship between prescriptive advice and parental practices in “Advice to Historians on Advice to Mothers,” Journal of Social History 9 (Fall 1975): 44–63.Google Scholar

5 Geertz, Clifford “Common Sense as a Cultural System,“ in Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology (New York, 1983), 75, 91.Google Scholar

6 Stehr, Nico and Ericson, Richard V. “The Culture and Power of Knowledge in Modern Society,“ in The Culture and Power of Knowledge: Inquiries into Contemporary Societies, ed. Stehr, Nico and Ericson, Richard V. (New York, 1992), 4.Google Scholar

7 On professionalism, see Larson, Magali Sarfatti The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis (Berkeley, Calif., 1977); and Bledstein, Burton J. The Culture of Professionalism: The Middle Class and the Development of Higher Education in America (New York, 1976).Google Scholar

8 Cited in Bishop, Morris A History of Cornell (Ithaca, NY., 1962), 380.Google Scholar

9 Lichterman, Paul “Self-help Reading as a Thin Culture,“ Media, Culture, and Society 14 (July 1992): 422.Google Scholar

10 On the tradition of community among New York rural women, see Osterud, Nancy Grey Bonds of Community: The Lives of Farm Women in Nineteenth-Century New York (Ithaca, N.Y., 1991). For discussions of interpretive communities, see especially Radway, Janice A. Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1984); and Fish, Stanley Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities (Cambridge, Mass., 1980). Sara Ruddick's Maternal Thinking: Toward a Politics of Peace (Boston, 1989), has influenced my ideas about the impact of maternal practices on mothers’ thinking.Google Scholar

11 Schlossman, “Philanthropy and the Gospel of Child Development,“ 276.Google Scholar

12 New York State College of Home Economics at Cornell University, Sixteenth Annual Report, Ithaca, 1941. See also Grant, Julia “Modernizing Mothers: Home Economics and the Parent Education Movement, 1925–45,“ in Rethinking Home Economics, ed. Stage, Sarah and Vincenti, Virginia (Ithaca, N.Y., forthcoming).Google Scholar

13 For biographical information on Wylie, see Ford, Mary et al., “Margaret Wylie,” in Necrology of Cornell Faculty, 1963–1964 (Ithaca, N.Y., 1964), 41–42.Google Scholar

14 Stromberg, Eugene T. “Influence of the Central Rural School on Community Organization,“ Cornell Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 699 (June 1938); Anderson, W. A. “Population Trends in New York State, 1900 to 1950,” Rural Sociology Publication 47 (Apr. 1956): 64–65.Google Scholar

15 According to Anderson, W. A. only 5 percent of home bureau members had less than eight years of education. Anderson, W. A. “Farm Women in the Home Bureau: A Study in Cortland County, New York, 1939,” Cornell University Agriculture Experiment Station Bulletin, Department of Rural Sociology 3 (Oct. 1941): 3. On the average educational level of adult females in New York, see U.S. Bureau of the Census, Sixteenth Census of the United States: 1940 Population, vol. 2: Characteristics of Population, part 5: New York-Oregon (Washington, D.C., 1943), 29.Google Scholar

16 Child Guidance Series Questionnaires, Suffolk County 1928–29, MW.Google Scholar

17 Anderson, “Farm Women in the Home Bureau,“ 3. See also, Anderson, W. A. and Plambeck, Hans H. “The Social Participation of Farm Families,“ Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station, Department of Rural Sociology 8 (Mar. 1943): 13–14. On the New York farm woman's productive activities, see Babbitt, Kathleen R. “The Productive Farm Woman and the Extension Home Economist in New York State, 1920–1940,” Agricultural History 67 (Spring 1993): 83–101.Google Scholar

18 Arsup, Mrs. Will to Bureau, Home n.d., Oswego County Home Demonstration Agent 1933–40, MW.Google Scholar

19 See Ross, Dorothy G. Stanley Hall: The Psychologist as Prophet (Chicago, 1972); Kliebard, Herbert M. The Struggle for the American Curriculum, 1893–1958 (Boston, 1986); and Dewey, John Democracy and Education (New York, 1916).Google Scholar

20 Hardyment, Christina Dream Babies: Three Centuries of Good Advice on Child Care (New York, 1983), 169–70; Watson, John B. The Ways of Behaviorism (New York, 1928), 47.Google Scholar

21 The most influential of John, B. Watson's works include The Ways of Behaviorism and, especially, Psychological Care of Infant and Child (New York, 1928). Another popular behaviorist of the period was Thorn, Douglas A. who authored several Children's Bureau pamphlets and wrote many child-rearing texts, including Everyday Problems of the Everyday Child (New York, 1929). On Watson and behaviorism in the 1920s, see O'Donnell, John M., The Origins of Behaviorism: American Psychology, 1870–1920 (New York, 1985); Birnbaum, Lucille C. “Behaviorism in the 1920's,” American Quarterly 7 (Spring 1955): 15–30; and Buckley, Kerry W. Mechanical Man: John Broadus Watson and the Beginnings of Behaviorism (New York, 1989). Two Cornell faculty members, Waring, Ethel B. and Wilker, Marguerite also published their own prescriptive text utilizing behaviorist principles, which was often used in study groups, entitled The Behavior of Young Children (New York, 1929).Google Scholar

22 Fass, Paula S. argues that America's attraction to behaviorism may have been a reaction to the emergence of the child-centered family. Fass, Paula S. The Damned and the Beautiful: American Youth in the 1920s (New York, 1977), 106.Google Scholar

23 Oakfield Child Study Club Notebook, n.d., Genesee County 1929–30, MW.Google Scholar

24 Oakfield-Batavia Report, n.d., Genesee County 1928–29, MW.Google Scholar

25 Southold Home Bureau Child Study Club Notebook, 14 May 1930, Suffolk County 1929–30, MW; Penfield Child Study Club Report, 7 Nov. 1944, Monroe County 1944–45, MW.Google Scholar

26 Weiss, “Mother: The Invention of Necessity”; and idem, “The Mother-Child Dyad Revisited: Perceptions of Mothers and Children in Twentieth Century Child-Rearing Manuals,“ Journal of Social Issues 34 (1978): 32.Google Scholar

27 Playlets for Mary Jemison Child Study Club, “A Sleeping Situation,” n.d., Wyoming County 1934–36, MW.Google Scholar

28 Child Study Club Report, 14 May 1929, Mrs. Laura Gannett Smith, East Concord, MW.Google Scholar

29 “Report of Progress in Parent Education in California, October 1–December 15, 1926,” folder 280, box 27, series 3, 4, Laura Spelman Rockefeller Memorial Archives, Rockefeller Archive Center, Tarrytown, N.Y.; Martha Wolfenstein, “Fun Morality: An Analysis of Recent American Child-Training Literature,” in Childhood in Contemporary Cultures, ed. Mead, Margaret and Wolfenstein, Martha (Chicago, 1955), 169–71. See Thom's Everyday Problems of the Everyday Child, 107, in which he describes the cuff and the “unpleasant medications” which could be used to correct thumb-sucking.Google Scholar

30 Sandy Creek Child Study Club Report, 13 Mar. 1934, Oswego County 1933–39, MW.Google Scholar

31 Weiss, “The Mother-Child Dyad Revisited,“ 32; Monroe County Child Study Club, 31 Oct. 1931, Monroe County 1930–31, MW; Naples Child Study Club Report, 12 Apr. 1932, Ontario County 1931–33, MW; Webster Child Study Club Report, 16 Mar. 1936, Monroe County 1935–40, MW.Google Scholar

32 Sandy Creek Child Study Club Report, 8 Dec. 1936.Google Scholar

33 Syracuse-Salem-Hyde Family Life Report, 3 Apr. 1940, Syracuse City Home Bureau Units Report 1938–40, MW; Walkhill Valley Child Study Club Report, 9 Dec. 1929, Ulster County 1929–30, MW; Hamilton Child Study Club Report, 16 Nov. 1932, Monroe County 1931–40, MW.Google Scholar

34 See Gordon, Linda Heroes of Their Own Lives: The Politics and History of Family Violence: Boston, 1880–1960 (New York, 1988), 139.Google Scholar

35 On the religious roots of punishment, see Philip Greven, Spare the Child: The Religious Roots of Punishment and the Psychological Impact of Physical Abuse (New York, 1991), 46. Lockport Child Study Club, 20 Feb. 1945, Niagara County 1941–45, MW; Child Guidance Series Questionnaires, n.d., Ontario County, Nov.–Dec. 1930, MW; Natalie Campbell to Margaret Wylie, 31 Jan. 1929, MW.Google Scholar

36 Albany Home Demonstration Meeting Questionnaires, n.d., Albany County 1927–28, MW; Child Guidance Series Questionnaires, n.d., Sep.–Dec. 1931, Herkimer County, MW.Google Scholar

37 Sandy Creek Child Study Club Report, 13 Mar. 1934 and 13 Oct. 1936.Google Scholar

38 Henrietta Child Study Club Report, 15 Feb. 1945, Monroe County 1940–45, MW.Google Scholar

39 Hilton Child Study Club Report, 13 Apr. 1930, Monroe County 1930–31, MW.Google Scholar

40 See especially Gesell, Arnold and Ilg, Frances Infant and Child in the Culture of Today: The Guidance of Development in Home and Nursery School (New York, 1943); Gruenberg, Sidonie Matsner “Family Life—Then and Now,” Child Study 16 (Nov. 1938): 44; Mt. Morris Home Bureau Unit Meeting, 6 Nov. 1941, Livingston County 1940–44, MW; Lockport Parents Guild Report, 19 Sep. 1944, Niagara County 1940–45, Mrs. Schryner, Raymond MW.Google Scholar

41 Henrietta Child Study Club Report, 17 Feb. 1942.Google Scholar

42 Sandy Creek Child Study Club Report, 19 Jan. 1937.Google Scholar

43 Mother Hubbard Child Study Club Report, 7 July 1945, Erie County 1940–45, MW.Google Scholar

44 Tonawanda Gahunda Child Study Club Report, 25 Feb. 1941, Genesee County 1940–45, MW; Sound Avenue Child Study Club Notebook, 17 Jan. 1930; Kerhonksen-Ellenville-Accord Child Study Club Report, 23 Oct. 1940, Ulster County 1940–45, MW.Google Scholar

45 Mother Hubbard Child Study Club Report, 2 Nov. 1945; Lockport Mothers’ Group Report, 4 Oct. 1943, Niagara County 1941–45, Mrs. Robert Shutes, MW.Google Scholar

46 Maddigan, Lilian Diane to Wylie, Margaret 21 Sep. 1943, in Bennett Study Club Records, Kenmore, Buffalo County 1940–45, MWGoogle Scholar

47 See Grant, Julia “Modernizing Motherhood: Child Study Clubs and the Parent Education Movement“ (Ph.D. diss., Boston University, 1992), for a discussion of the activities of these two organizations.Google Scholar