¹ Silberman, Charles E., Crisis in the Classroom: The Remaking of American Education (New York, 1970), 349–50.Google Scholar

² Barnard, Henry, School Architecture, or Contributions to the Improvement of School-Houses in the United States 2d ed. (New York, 1848), 55.Google Scholar

³ Lefkowitz Horowitz, Helen, Alma Mater: Design and Experience in the Women's Colleges from their Nineteenth Century Beginnings to the 1930s (New York, 1984); Turner, Paul V., Campus: An American Planning Tradition (Cambridge, Mass., 1984); Robson, Edward R., School Architecture: Being Practical Remarks on the Planning, Designing, Building, and Furnishing of School-Houses (London, 1874; New York, 1972), 17.Google Scholar

⁴ Kaestle, Carl F., The Evolution of an Urban School System: New York City, 1750–1S50 (Cambridge, Mass., 1973), 177.Google Scholar

⁵ Cooledge, Harold N. Jr., Samuel Sloan: Architect of Philadelphia, 1815–1884 (Philadelphia, 1986), 28–31.Google Scholar

⁶ O'Breza, John E., “Philadelphia Parochial School System from 1830–1920: Growth and Bureaucratization“ (Ed.D. diss., Temple University, 1979).Google Scholar

⁷ Ayres, May, “A Century of Progress in Schoolhouse Construction,“ American School Board Journal 55 (July 1917): 25; Robson, School Architecture, 15–16.Google Scholar

⁸ Alcott, William A., “On the Construction of Schoolhouses,“ in The Introductory Discourse and the Lectures delivered before the American Institute of Instruction in Boston, August 1831…. (Boston, 1832); Mann, Horace, “Supplementary Report on the Subject of School-Houses,” in Life and Works of Horace Mann, ed. Mann, Mary, 2 vols. (Boston, 1891), 2: 435–36; Jean, and McClintock, Robert, eds., Henry Barnard's “School Architecture” (New York, 1970), 2n, 3–6, 50. For their text the McClintocks used the second edition of School Architecture, published in 1848.Google Scholar

⁹ Tyack, David B., The One Best System: A History of American Urban Education (Cambridge, Mass., 1974); Schultz, Stanley K., The Culture Factory: Boston Public Schools, 1784–1860 (New York, 1973), 130; Lortie, Dan, Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study (Chicago, 1975), 15–17; “School Architecture: Plans for Union and Graded Schools [and] Grammar Schools in Boston,” American journal of Education 12 (Dec. 1862): 704–705; “School Architecture,” American Journal of Education 24 (Oct. 1873): 545–46.Google Scholar

¹⁰ “School Architecture,” American Journal of Education 16 (Dec. 1866): 704. In some American communities teachers turned schoolhouses built for the Lancasterian system into buildings subdivided by pupil age and subject matter. Adopting their surroundings to German practice, authorities at the East School in Salem, Massachusetts, assigned their youngest pupils to two primary rooms on the school's lower floor. Six recitation rooms on the upper floor became classrooms devoted to special subjects, but the building still contained two large rooms, each arranged for 176 pupils of different ages. Ayres, “A Century of Progress,” 25–26; Barnard, Henry, Report on the Condition and Improvement of the Public Schools of Rhode Island, Submitted Nov. 1, 1845 (Providence, R. I., 1846), 216–17.Google Scholar

¹¹ Cutler, William W. III, “A Preliminary Look at the Schoolhouse: The Philadelphia Story, 1870–1920 “ Urban Education 8 (Jan. 1974): 381–99; Troen, Selwyn K., The Public and the Schools: Shaping the St. Louis System, 1838–1920 (Columbia, Mo., 1975), 148; “School Architecture,” American Journal of Education 24 (Oct. 1873): 557-59, 563, 567–71, 593–99; “New York City,” American Journal of Education 24 (Oct. 1873): 641, 646–47.Google Scholar

¹² “Union Schoolhouse, Ypsilanti, Mich.,” American Journal of Education 24 (Oct. 1873): 585–87; “Union Schoolhouse, Ann Arbor, Mich.,” American Journal of Education 24 (Oct. 1873): 589; Fine, Benjamin, “Rural Schools Still Inferior Despite Gains, Study Shows,” New York Times, 12 Mar. 1951, 1, 18; Andrew Gulliford, America's Country Schools (Washington, D.C., 1984), 25.Google Scholar

¹³ Burrowes, Thomas H., ed., Pennsylvania School Architecture: A Manual of Directions and Plans for Grading, Locating, Constructing, Heating, Ventilating and Furnishing Common School Houses (Harrisburg, Pa., 1855); Dwyer, Charles P., The Economy of Church, Parsonage and School Architecture Adapted to Small Societies and Rural Districts (Buffalo, 1856); Eveleth, Samuel F., School House Architecture (New York, 1870).Google Scholar

¹⁴ Johonnot, James, Country School-Houses: Containing Elevations, Plans, and Specifications…. (New York, 1859), 119.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Ibid., 23–24.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Dresslar, Fletcher B., American Schoolhouses U. S. Bureau of Education, Bulletin no. 5, 1910 (Washington, D.C., 1911), 1; Schultz, Culture Factory, 82–83, 91–93; Spatz, Marshall C., “New York City Public Schools and the Emergence of Bureaucracy, 1868–1917,“ (Ph.D. diss., University of Chicago, 1975), 207–14. Health officials and reformers supported educators in their effort to make schoolhouses more sanitary, and by 1900 many states had school codes requiring adequate privies, fireproofing, and ventilation. Duffy, John, “School Buildings and the Health of American School Children in the Nineteenth Century,” in Healing and History: Essays for George Rosen, ed. Rosenberg, Charles E. (New York, 1979), 161–78.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Peterson, Paul E., The Politics of School Reform, 1870–1940 (Chicago, 1985), 34, 41; Dentler, Robert A. and Scott, Marvin B., Schools on Trial: An Inside Account of the Boston Desegregation Case (Cambridge, Mass., 1981), 75–76. Professional educators and school architects tried valiantly to combat corruption and favoritism in school building projects. The popularity of the school survey in the 1920s helped them make their case for reform. See, for example, Strayer, George D. with Hart, Frank and Engelhardt, N. L., Report of the Survey of the Schools of Chicago, Illinois, vol. 4, Housing the Schools (New York, 1932), 5–9.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Engelhardt, Nickolaus L., A School Building Program for Cities (New York, 1918); Strayer, George B. and Engelhardt, Nickolaus L., Standards for Elementary School Buildings (New York, 1920).Google Scholar

¹⁹ March Wheelwright, Edmund, School Architecture: A General Treatise for the Use of Architects and Others (Boston, 1901), 110, 119; Spatz, “New York City Public Schools,” 215–16, 219–21, 230.Google Scholar

²⁰ Fuller, Wayne E., The Old Country School: The Story of Rural Education in the Middle West (Chicago, 1982), 228–45; Gulliford, America's Country Schools, 194–95.Google Scholar

²¹ Moehlman, Arthur, Public School Plant Program (New York, 1929), 100; Whipple, Guy M., ed., The Thirty-Third Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education part 1, The Planning and Construction of School Buildings (Bloomington, Ill., 1934), 97, 103–104, 157–58, 158n.Google Scholar

²² Spatz, “New York City Public Schools,” 223–24; Whipple, , ed., Thirty-Third Yearbook 96, 99; Donovan, John J. et al., School Architecture: Principles and Practices (New York, 1921), 28.Google Scholar

²³ Wheelwright, , School Architecture, 210.Google Scholar

²⁴ Krug, Edward A., The Shaping of the American High School (New York, 1964), 48–51, 64–65, 89–90; Wheelwright, School Architecture, 210–15; Dewey, John, The School and Society, rev. ed. (New York, 1915; Chicago, 1966), 31–33, 75, 79–81, 85, 87, 91.Google Scholar

²⁵ In 1912 there were 6 work-study-play schools in two American cities; by 1920 there were 147 such schools in 40 cities, and eight years later 963 such schools in 177 cities. Roscoe, D. Case, The Platoon School in America (Stanford, Ca., 1931), 27.Google Scholar

²⁶ Ibid., viii, 10.Google Scholar

²⁷ Strayer, George D. and Bachman, Frank, The Gary Public Schools: Organization and Administration (New York, 1918), 23–40, 59–61; Case, Platoon School, 66–67, 78–84. For an extended analysis of the growth of the Gary plan and the controversy surrounding it, see Ronald D. Cohen and Raymond Mohl, The Paradox of Progressive Education: The Gary Plan and Urban Schooling (Port Washington, N.Y., 1979), 26–30, 35–66.Google Scholar

²⁸ Donovan, et al., School Architecture 18, 85, 135; see also Spain, Charles L., Moehlman, Arthur B., and Frostic, Fred W., The Public Elementary School Plant (Chicago, 1930), xxv, 50–57. Born in Massachusetts, Donovan graduated from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and practiced architecture in New York and Pittsburgh before settling in Oakland, California, where he specialized in school design. Withey, Henry F. and Rathburn Withey, Elsie, Biographical Dictionary of American Architects (Los Angeles, 1970), 179–80.Google Scholar

²⁹ Case, , Platoon School, 78; Donovan et al., School Architecture, 260; Spain, Moehlman, and Frostic, The Public Elementary School Plant, iii, 420.Google Scholar

³⁰ Donovan et al., School Architecture, 388, 393; see also Hill, Andrew P. Jr., “Suiting the Rural Building Plan to Educational Needs,” The Nation's Schools 7 (June 1931): 62.Google Scholar

³¹ Spain, Charles L., “The Platoon School in Detroit,“ The Detroit Educational Bulletin (Jan. 1923): 21, 31–32; see also Donovan et al., School Architecture, 393.Google Scholar

³² Lazerson, Marvin, Origins of the Urban School: Public Education in Massachusetts, 1870–1915 (Cambridge, Mass., 1971), 39–41; Taylor Allen, Ann, “Let Us Live with Our Children: Kindergarten Movements in Germany and the United States, 1840–1914,“ History of Education Quarterly 28 (Spring 1988): 28–29, 36–37.Google Scholar

³³ Perkins, Lawrence B., “Day Schools,“ in Forms and Functions of Twentieth-Century Architecture, ed. Hamlin, Talbot (New York, 1952), 3: 552–61.Google Scholar

³⁴ Profiles of Significant Schools: Schools without Walls (New York, n.d.), 3; Profiles of Significant Schools: Newton South High School, Newton, Massachusetts (New York, 1960), 19.Google Scholar

³⁵ Donovan et al., School Architecture, 24.Google Scholar

³⁶ Tyack, David B. and Hansot, Elizabeth, Managers of Virtue: Public School Leadership in America, 1820–1980 (New York, 1982), 4–5. For a discussion of the iconography of American schools see Butchart, Ronald E., Local Schools: Exploring Their History (Nashville, 1986), 86–98.Google Scholar

³⁷ Mann, “Supplementary Report on the Subject of School-Houses,” 2: 435–36; Ayres, May, “A Century of Progress in Schoolhouse Construction,“ American School Board Journal 55 (Aug. 1917): 24–25.Google Scholar

³⁸ Spain, , Moehlman, , and Frostic, , The Public Elementary School Plant 3; Moehlman, Public School Plant Program, 32; Donovan et al., School Architecture, 573. Building a schoolhouse, said Fletcher Dresslar, is a task to be done with “holy hands,” befitting the elevated goal of “civic brotherhood.” Dresslar, American Schoolhouses, 100.Google Scholar

³⁹ Cavallo, Dominic, Muscles and Morals: Organized Playgrounds and Urban Reform, 1880–1920 (Philadelphia, 1981); Donovan et al., School Architecture, 327.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Whipple, , ed., Thirty-Third Yearbook, 107–108; “Open Plan School in the Inner City,” Schoolhouse 2 (May 1971): 3; “Open Plan Interiors Are Meant to Be Rearranged by Staff and Students,” Schoolhouse 12 (Oct. 1973): 3. This publication was the newsletter of the Educational Facilities Laboratories.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Alcott, , “Construction of Schoolhouses,” 241.Google Scholar

⁴² Fuller, , Old Country School, 73–74. For a similar interpretation of the first buildings at such pioneering seminaries and colleges for women as Mount Holyoke and Smith, sec Horowitz, Alma Mater, 20–21, 74–78.Google Scholar

⁴³ “School Architecture,” American Journal of Education 6 (June 1859): 520.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Dale Owen, Robert, Hints on Public Architecture (New York, 1849), 39.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Johonnot, , Country School-Houses, 20–21, 214, 220. Spain, Moehlman, and Frostic, The Public Elementary School Plant, 370; see also Case, Platoon School, 76; Perry, Clarence A., Wider Use of the School Plant (New York, 1910), 187.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Riis, Jacob A., The Battle with the Slum (New York, 1902), 353–54; Wheelwright, School Architecture, 16; “The Work of Ittner, William B., FAIA,” Architectural Record 57 (Feb. 1925): 99, 101. Ittner's views carried considerable weight in both the architectural and educational professions. Appointed in 1897, he served as Commissioner of School Buildings in St. Louis for thirteen years and, subsequently, as the official architect of the city's Board of Education. By the time of his death in 1936 his schools stood not only in St. Louis but in many cities, including Dallas, Nashville, Minneapolis, Gary, and Washington, D.C. (see also Figure 3). Withey and Withey, Biographical Dictionary of American Architects, 316–17.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Regional Planning Federation of the Philadelphia Tri-State District, The Regional Plan of the Philadelphia Tri-State District (Philadelphia, 1932), 66.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Perry, , Wider Use of the School Plant, 176–77; Annual Report of the School District of St. Louis (St. Louis, 1907), 333, quoted in Troen, The Public and the Schools, 205. In the early twentieth century urban reformers thought that parks could contribute to public refinement and moral education. In some cities school and park authorities worked together on playground programming. Galen Cranz, The Politics of Park Design: A History of Urban Parks in America (Cambridge, Mass., 1982), 67–68, 80–81.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ “School Architecture,” American journal of Education 24 (Oct. 1873): 545–46; Donovan et al., School Architecture, 320. According to his biographer, Sloan was ostracized by a Barnard, Henry jealous, whose influential American Journal of Education seldom mentioned Sloan or his innovative ideas. Cooledge, Samuel Sloan, 30–31, 48–50. In the nineteenth century German gymnasiums almost always contained a special assembly room. Known as the aula, it was not intended for daily use but rather the occasional service necessitated by public examinations. American educators copied this architectural form, adapting it to their own school routines. Like its predecessor, the large school room, they expected it to be used every day, but because of the cost of its construction, they experimented with structural alternatives. In some American schools built in the 1880s the entrance hall was used for assembly purposes. By making the corridors of the upper floors into balconies of the downstairs hall, the school architect could enlarge the capacity of this makeshift auditorium. Robson, School Architecture, 80–81; May Ayres, “A Century of Progress in Schoolhouse Construction,” American School Board journal 55 (Sept. 1917): 25–26.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Wheelwright, , School Architecture, 83–88, 123; “Boston Girls’ High School,” American Journal of Education 24 (March 1873): 203. See also Perry, Wider Use of the School Plant. Google Scholar

⁵¹ Dresslar, , American Schoolhouses, 36; Donovan et al., School Architecture, 320; Spain, Moehlman, and Frostic, The Public Elementary School Plant, 297; Everett, Samuel, ed., The Community School (New York, 1938), 46.Google Scholar

⁵² Smith, Timothy L., “Protestant Schooling and American Nationality, 1800–1850,“ Journal of American History 53 (Mar. 1967): 688–89; Tyack, David B., “The Tribe and the Common School: Community Control in Rural Education,” American Quarterly 24 (Mar. 1972): 5; Fuller, Old Country School, 74–75.Google Scholar

⁵³ Alcott, , “Construction of Schoolhouses,” 255; Gulliford, America's Country Schools, 79–89; Perkins, Dwight H., “The Relation of Schoolhouse Architecture to the Social Center Movement,“ Journal of Proceedings and Addresses of the Fiftieth Annual Meeting [of the National Education Association of the U. S.] (Ann Arbor, Mich., 1912), 237.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Scott, Mel, American City Planning since 1890 (Los Angeles, 1969), 72; Perry, Wider Use of the School Plant, 379.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Perry, , Wider Use of the School Plant, 4–13, 87; Berger, Morris I., “The Settlement, the Immigrant and the Public School: A Case Study of the Influence of the Settlement Movement and the New Migration upon Public Education, 1890–1924,“ (Ph.D. diss., Columbia University, 1956), 132.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Riis, , The Battle with the Slum, 291, 361, 398–99, 404; Sol Cohen, Progressives and Urban School Reform: The Public Education Association of New York City, 1895–1954 (New York, 1964), 48–53.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Riis, , The Battle with the Slum, 403; Perry, Clarence A. and Williams, Marguerita P., New York School Centers and Their Community Policy (New York, 1931), 7–8; see also Spring, Joel H., Education and the Rise of the Corporate State (Boston, 1972), 78–79.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Berger, , “The Settlement, the Immigrant and the Public School,” 83, 95–96; Davis, Allen F., Spearheads for Reform: The Social Settlements and the Progressive Movement, 1890–1914 (New York, 1967), 76–81; Perry and Williams, New York School Centers, 26.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Scott, , American City Planning, 72–73; Mumford, Lewis, The Urban Prospect (New York, 1968), 65. Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Perry, , Wider Use of the School Plant, 276–80, 339–43.Google Scholar

⁶¹ Stevens, Edward W. Jr., “Social Centers, Politics, and Social Efficiency in the Progressive Era “ History of Education Quarterly 12 (Spring 1972): 16–33; Perry, Wider Use of the School Plant, 257, 273. Historians have disagreed about whether or not schools as social centers were liberating or repressive. “The liberal-Progressivism (often conservative liberalism) of the social center in Rochester,” Edward Stevens has said, celebrated freedom of speech but “only so long as it resulted in no plan of action nor offered any fundamental challenge to the status quo.” Reese, William J., on the other hand, has argued that in Rochester and elsewhere the social center movement was more complex and contradictory, “promoting citizenship, democracy, socialism, neighborhood solidarity, equality of opportunity, and social control.” Stevens, “Social Centers, Politics, and Social Efficiency,” 29–30; Reese, William J., Power and the Promise of School Reform: Grassroots Movements during the Progressive Era (Boston, 1986), 190.Google Scholar

⁶² Berger, , “The Settlement, the Immigrant and the Public School,” 140, 153; Mumford, Urban Prospect, 64–65, 68–69; see also “A Regional Plan for the Philadelphia Metropolitan District, 1924,” 29, in the papers of the Philadelphia Housing Association, Box 24, Urban Archives, Paley Library, Temple University; Perry, Clarence A., The Neighborhood Unit: Neighborhood and Community Planning, Regional Plan of New York and Its Environs, Regional Survey, vol. 7 (New York, 1929; 1974), 37, 40–41. The schoolhouse as a center of neighborhood life lost its appeal among planners in the 1930s and 1940s when neighborhood improvement increasingly became associated with slum clearance and privately funded urban redevelopment. Gillette, Howard Jr., “The Evolution of Neighborhood Planning: From the Progressive Era to the 1949 Housing Act,“ Journal of Urban History 9 (Aug. 1983): 429–38.Google Scholar

⁶³ Perry, and Williams, , New York School Centers 11–12.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Engelhardt, N. L. and Engelhardt, N. L. Jr., Planning the Community School (New York, 1940), 135–37.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ See, for example, Hentoff, Nat, Our Children Are Dying (New York, 1966), 46; Itzkoff, Seymour W., A New Public Education (New York, 1976), 282.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Federal Aid to School Construction: Hearings before a Special Subcommittee of the Committee on Education and Labor, house of Representatives, Eighty-first Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 1551…. (Washington, D.C., 1950), 89.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Messerli, Jonathan, Horace Mann: A Biography (New York, 1972), 252–53, 291–92, 297–98; Mann, “Supplementary Report on the Subject of School-Houses,” 2: 454–61, 476–84; Alcott, “Construction of Schoolhouses,” 253–54.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Quoted in Spatz, , “New York City Public Schools,” 204. Moehlman, Public School Plant Program, 10.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Fine, Benjamin, “Education in Review,“ New York Times, 8 Nov. 1953.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Mann, , “Supplementary Report on the Subject of School-Houses,” 2: 489.Google Scholar

⁷¹ Troen, , The Public and the Schools, 15–17; Spencer Edmonds, Franklin, ed., Proceedings of the Dedication of the New Buildings of the Central High School Philadelphia, November 22, 24, 25, 26, 1902 (Philadelphia, 1910), 15–23; Catalogue of the Boston Latin School (Boston, 1969), 2, 30.Google Scholar

⁷² Donovan, et al., School Architecture, 27–28.Google Scholar

⁷³ Profiles of Significant Schools: High Schools, 1962. A Status Report on Educational Change and Architectural Consequence (New York, 1962), 68.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Kohl, Herbert R., The Open Classroom: A Practical Guide to a New Way of Teaching (New York, 1969), 35; idem, 36 Children (New York, 1967), 188.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Kozol, Jonathan, Death at an Early Age: The Destruction of the Hearts and Minds of Negro Children in the Boston Public Schools (Boston, 1967), 31–35.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Binzen, Peter, Whitetown USA (New York, 1970), 155; James Herndon, The Way It Spozed to Be (New York, 1969), 1; Hentoff, Our Children Are Dying, 4, 135–36.Google Scholar

⁷⁷ Allen Bullock, Henry, A History of Negro Education in the South from 1619 to the Present (New York, 1970), 182; Conant, James B., Slums and Suburbs: A Commentary on Schools in Metropolitan Areas (New York, 1961), 3. See also Anderson, James D., The Education of Blacks in the South, 1860–1935 (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1988), 154, 156, 176–81.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Cutler, , “A Preliminary Look at the Schoolhouse,” 389–96; Dentler and Scott, Schools on Trial, 75–76, 81–82.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ Dentler, and Scott, , Schools on Trial, 97–98; Silberman, Crisis in the Classroom, 128. Herbert Kohl also learned that a new building was no panacea. Moving P.S. 103 into new quarters did not achieve miracles. “The building was new,” he wrote, but “the school wasn't…. Within a few weeks the chaos and disorder of the old school was reconstituted in the new one.” Kohl, 36 Children, 162.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ Katz, Michael B., Class, Bureaucracy, and Schools: The Illusion of Educational Change in America (New York, 1971), xvii–xviii.Google Scholar

⁸¹ Goodlad, John I., “The Schools vs. Education,“ Saturday Review, 19 Apr. 1969, 60; idem, A Place Called School: Prospects for the Future (New York, 1984), 240; “The Five Correlates for an Effective School,” The Effective School Report: From Research to Practice 1 (Nov. 1983): 3.Google Scholar

⁸² See, for example, Isaac, Rhys, The Transformation of Virginia, 1740–1790 (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1982); Gowans, Alan, Images of American Living: Four Centuries of Architecture and Furniture as Cultural Expression (New York, 1964).Google Scholar

⁸³ Meeks, Carroll L. V., The Railroad Station: An Architectural History (New Haven, 1956); Thompson, John D. and Goldin, Grace, The Hospital: A Social and Architectural History (New Haven, 1975); Gwendolyn Wright, Building the Dream: A Social History of Housing in America (New York, 1981), 11–17, 21–23.Google Scholar