Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:58:43.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Business Community and the Public Schools on the Eve of the Great Depression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

S. Alexander Rippa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

After 1900 demands for a more functional education in the secondary schools were argued with growing fervor as efforts to extend and perfect the ideal of universal educational opportunity were intensified. In pamphlets, at association meetings, and through a variety of other media, one proponent after another reiterated the traditional arguments: universal education would minimize social cleavage and keep equality of opportunity open; it would bring enlightenment to the republic; it would reduce crime; and it would serve to induct an increasingly heterogeneous and growing immigrant population into American society. These arguments reflected an increasing effort to expand the common school ideal to meet the changing needs of American life.

Type
Research Article
Information
History of Education Quarterly , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 1964 , pp. 33 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © 1964, University of Pittsburgh Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. U. S. Department of the Interior, Report of the United States Commissioner of Education, II (Washington, 1916), 449. The incompleteness of returns no doubt affected the accuracy of these figures.Google Scholar

2. See Report of the Commission on National Aid to Vocational Education, House Document No. 1004, 63rd Cong., 2d Sess. (Washington, 1914), II, 100, 181, and 270.Google Scholar

3. National Association of Manufacturers, Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Convention Held at New York, N. Y., May 20, 21, and 22, 1907 (New York, 1907), 131.Google Scholar

4. National Association of Manufacturers, Pamphlet No. 7, “Let Us Send the Whole Boy to School,” by James, W. Cleave, Van (New York, [1908]), 7. The exact date of publication is not printed on these early pamphlets distributed by the Association. The date can usually be ascertained from the content or, in the case of a few pamphlets, from a notation on the title page. On the back cover of each pamphlet in this early series is printed the following information: “Educational Literature Published By The National Association Of Manufacturers, 30 Church Street, New York City. Supplied On Request Free Of Charge.”Google Scholar

5. National Association of Manufacturers, Pamphlet No. 4, “The Next Step in Education” (New York, n.d.; An Address Delivered on April 15, 1908, by Gunsaulus, Dr. F. W., president of the Armour Institute, Chicago), 20.Google Scholar

6. National Association of Manufacturers, Report of the Committee on Junior Education and Employment, Proceedings of the Thirty-first Annual Convention Held at New York City, Oct. 5, 6, and 7, 1926 (New York, 1926), 117.Google Scholar

7. National Association of Manufacturers, Circular No. 21, “Annual Report of the President” (Philadelphia, 1898), 20.Google Scholar

8. National Association of Manufacturers, Pamphlet No. 4, op. cit., 21–22.Google Scholar

9. National Association of Manufacturers, Pamphlet No. 5, “The Boy and the Law” (New York, [1908]), 18.Google Scholar

10. National Association of Manufacturers, Pamphlet No. 28, “Industrial Education” (New York, n.d.; Report of the Committee on Industrial Education Submitted at the Seventeenth Annual Convention in New York City on May 21, 1912), 4–5, 14.Google Scholar

11. National Association of Manufacturers, Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Convention Held at New York City, May 20, 21, and 22, 1912 (New York, 1912), 151, 156–58.Google Scholar

12. National Association of Manufacturers, Proceedings (1907), op. cit., 131.Google Scholar

13. Nation's Business, I (April 15, 1913), 2. See also Nation's Business, I (September 15, 1913), 12; Miles, H. E., “Training the Children for Efficient Lives,” Nation's Business, II (April 15, 1914), 14–15; and “Commerce in the Month's News,” Nation's Business, IV (June 1916), 2.Google Scholar

14. Chamber of Commerce of the United States, Report of the Committee on Education (Washington, 1916), 4.Google Scholar

15. National Association of Manufacturers, Proceedings of the Twenty-second Annual Convention Held in New York, May 14, 15, and 16, 1917 (New York, 1917), 70.Google Scholar

16. Ireton, Louis D., “‘Let Young America Help!’” American Industries, XVIII (September 1917), 29.Google Scholar

17. Miles, Herbert E., “Making Sure of Good Workers Tomorrow,” American Industries, XVIII (August, 1917), 28. See also National Association of Manufacturers, Pamphlet No. 7, op. cit., 11; National Association of Manufacturers, Pamphlet No. 9, “Industrial Education as an Essential Factor in our National Prosperity,” by James, W. Van Cleave (New York, n.d.; An Address before the National Society for the Promotion of Industrial Education, Chicago, January 23, 1908), 10; National Association of Manufacturers, Circular No. 29, “Commerical Traveling in South America” (Philadelphia, 1899), 27; and National Association of Manufacturers, Circular No. 5, “A Commerical Tour to South America” (Philadelphia, 1896), 3.Google Scholar

18. Chamber of Commerce of the United States, Policies of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States (Washington, 1929), 27.Google Scholar

19. National Association of Manufacturers, Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Convention Held at New York City, May 19 and 20, 1914 (New York, 1914), 99–100.Google Scholar

20. National Association of Manufacturers, Pamphlet No. 22, “Industrial Education” (New York, n.d.; Report of the Committee on Industrial Education at the Sixteenth Annual Convention in New York City on May 16, 1911), 11; and National Association of Manufacturers, Proceedings (1914), op. cit., 101.Google Scholar

21. National Association of Manufacturers, Pamphlet No. 5, op. cit., 28. Italics in original.Google Scholar

22. National Association of Manufacturers, Proceedings (1907), op. cit., 111–12.Google Scholar

23. National Association of Manufacturers, Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Annual Convention Held at New York City, May 17, 18 and 19, 1920 (New York, 1920), 104.Google Scholar

24. National Association of Manufacturers, Pamphlet No. 8, “The Open Door” (New York, [1908]), 13.Google Scholar

25. National Association of Manufacturers, Proceedings (1912), op. cit., 151. See also National Association of Manufacturers, Pamphlet No. 28, op. cit., 5.Google Scholar

26. National Association of Manufacturers, Circular No. 21, op. cit., 19. Google Scholar

27. National Association of Manufacturers, Pamphlet No. 9, op. cit., 5.Google Scholar

28. National Association of Manufacturers, Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Annual Convention Held at New York City, May 19, 20 and 21, 1919 (New York, 1919), 177.Google Scholar

29. National Association of Manufacturers, Pamphlet No. 22, op. cit., 5.Google Scholar

30. National Association of Manufacturers, Proceedings (1912), op. cit., 155.Google Scholar

31. National Association of Manufacturers, Proceedings (1914), op. cit., 101.Google Scholar

32. National Association of Manufacturers, Proceedings (1920), op. cit., 103–104.Google Scholar

33. National Association of Manufacturers, Proceedings of the Thirty-second Annual Convention Held at Chattanooga, Tenn., Oct. 25, 26 and 27, 1927 (New York, 1927), 268.Google Scholar

34. National Association of Manufacturers, Proceedings (1926), op. cit., 130–31.Google Scholar

35. National Association of Manufacturers, Proceedings (1927), op. cit., 269.Google Scholar

36. Ibid., 270.Google Scholar

37. Cheney, Howell, “The Relations of Industry to Public Education,” American Industries, XXX (October 1929), 81–82.Google Scholar

38. National Association of Manufacturers, Proceedings (1927), op. cit., 269.Google Scholar

39. National Association of Manufacturers, Pamphlet No. 28, op. cit., 14. See also National Association of Manufacturers, Circular No. 39, “Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Convention” (Philadelphia, 1900), 91–105.Google Scholar

40. National Association of Manufacturers, Pamphlet No. 20, “Cruel Unionism” (New York, n. d.; An Address Delivered by Kirby, John Jr., at Kenyon College, Gambier, Ohio, February 3, 1911), 21.Google Scholar

41. National Association of Manufacturers, Pamphlet No. 25, “Address of John Kirby, Jr.” (New York, n.d.; Delivered at the Seventeenth Annual Convention of the National Association of Manufacturers, Waldorf-Astoria Hotel, New York City, May 21, 1912), 15.Google Scholar

42. Ibid., 12–19.Google Scholar

43. See National Association of Manufacturers, Report of the Committee on Readjustments After the War, Proceedings (1919), op. cit., 107; and Open Shop Bulletin, February 7, 1921, No. 4.Google Scholar

44. American Industries, XIII (July, 1913), 11.Google Scholar

45. Ibid., XVI (February, 1916), 22.Google Scholar

46. Ibid., XII (February, 1912), 43.Google Scholar

47. Ibid. Google Scholar

48. Chamber of Commerce of the United States, Civic Development Department, Special Committee on Education, “Minutes of the Meeting of February 11, 1922” (Washington, 1922), 1. (Typewritten.)Google Scholar

49. Ibid., 6.Google Scholar

50. Ibid., 5–6.Google Scholar

51. Ibid., 6.Google Scholar

52. Chamber of Commerce of the United States, Civic Development Department, Special Committee on Education, “Minutes of the Meeting of April 8, 1922” (Washington, 1922), 2. (Typewritten.)Google Scholar

53. Ibid., 2–3. In 1927 the subject of textbooks arose again at a meeting of the Civic Development Advisory Committee, at which time “material in school textbooks subversive to the Constitution and sound economics” was discussed. (Chamber of Commerce of the United States, Committee on Education, “Minutes of the Meeting of October 17, 1927, Held at West Baden, Indiana” [Washington, 1927], 1. [Typewritten.]).Google Scholar