No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Teaching of History in the Twelfth Century
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 February 2017
Extract
One of the most outstanding classical scholars in the twelfth century was John of Salisbury, who, steeped in the literature of the Latin writers, seems to echo Cicero when he remarks that to be properly literate one must be familiar with mathematics and history as well as with the poets and the orators. The twelfth century as a whole reflected a deep interest in history and historical writing, to such an extent that Haskins calls it one of the greatest periods of medieval historiography. But history as it was understood by men like John of Salisbury, Hugo of St. Victor, and other learned clerics of the age was the history of St. Augustine, not the “narration of past events” of the Greek and Roman historians. The classical historians had regarded history as a branch of the art of rhetoric, written to please public taste, or to relate anecdotes, or to set examples, or to display the literary powers of the authors. Their theory of world cycles, in which the order of the universe was pessimistically regarded as a degeneration from the Golden Age of the past to the Iron Age of the present, and in which the present reproduced the past and the future the present, was supplanted by a new philosophy of history as formulated by St. Augustine. St. Augustine asserted that the whole record of the world turned upon the divine concern for man, which had eventuated in the life of Christ. Prior to this miracle of Incarnation, all mankind had been doomed; after it, all of the elect were to be saved.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1962, University of Pittsburgh Press
References
Notes
1. De Oratore, (Cambridge, 1942), I, 34; III, 14.Google Scholar
2. Polycraticus, VII, 9, 126 (ed. by Webb), quoted in R. R. Bolgar, The Classical Heritage and Its Beneficiaries (Cambridge, 1954), 232.Google Scholar
3. Johnston, E. I., “How the Greeks and Romans Regarded History,” Greece and Rome, 3 (1933–34), 38–43.Google Scholar
4. Bury, J. B., The Idea of Progress (London, 1921), 21.Google Scholar
5. Haskins, Charles H., The Renaissance of the Twelfth Century (Cambridge, 1928), 228.Google Scholar
6. The six ages were: Adam, Noah, Abraham, David, the Babylonian Captivity, and the creation of man. Until St. Augustine, the Jewish and Christian notion was that each day of Creation lasted 1000 years, with no natural division into ages. William M. Green, “Augustine on the Teaching of History,” University of California Publications in Classical Philology, 12 (1944), 315–32.Google Scholar
7. Johnson, Henry, in his Teaching of History, 1940, says that it has been asserted that history was zealously taught in many cloister schools of the Middle Ages. P. 25. He gives as his authority Hermann Rosenburg, Methodik des Geschictsunterrichts, sechste Auflage, Breslau (1910), 130.Google Scholar
8. Green, William M., “Hugo of St. Victor De Tribus Maximis Circumstantiis Gestorum,” Speculum, 18 (1943), 484–93. This article contains a critical text of the prologue, a classification of the manuscripts, and a short description of the tables.Google Scholar
9. Paret, G., Brunet, A., Tremblay, P., La Renaissance du XII Siecle Les Ecoles et L' Enseignement (1933), 224.Google Scholar
10. De Tribus Maximis Circumstantiis Gestorum, 491, lines 11–13.Google Scholar
11. Ibid., 489, lines 28–48.Google Scholar
12. Didascalicon De Studio Legendi, III, 11 (61) in Boniface Wittenbrink, The Educational Contents and Implications of the “Didascalicon De Studio Legendi” of Hugh of St. Victor (Washington, D. C., 1947), 31.Google Scholar
13. Hugonin, Fluvien, “Essai Sur La Fondation de l' Ecole de Saint-Victor de Paris,” Patrologiae Latinae, CLXXV (1879), xvi–cxlii.Google Scholar
14. Myers, Edward, “Hugh of St. Victor,” Catholic Encyclopedia, VII, 521–23.Google Scholar
15. Green, William M., “Augustine on the Teaching of History,” 331.Google Scholar
16. As described in Green, William, “Hugo of St. Victor …,” 492–93.Google Scholar