Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:10:17.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Standards of Evidence in Historical Research: How Do We Know When We Know?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

Carl F. Kaestle
Carl F. Kaestle*
Affiliation:
The University of Wisconsin–Madison
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article seeks to give a brief response to the question, how do historians know when they know something? The question involves ideas about certitude and truth, and most historians today would make very modest claims about certitude or truth in our statements about the past. Many would echo Charles Beard, who said sixty years ago, “We hold a damn dim candle over a damn dark abyss.” Today the historical profession is fragmented, ideologically diverse, and somewhat relativistic, a situation that is applauded by some and bemoaned by others.

Type
Methodological Note
Information
History of Education Quarterly , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , Fall 1992 , pp. 361 - 366
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the History of Education Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Beard, Charles, cited in a communication by Smith, Robert F., American Historical Review 94 (Oct. 1989): 1247.Google Scholar

2 Novick, Peter, That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession (Cambridge, 1988), 1, 51.Google Scholar

3 Rorty, Richard, cited in Novick, , Noble Dream, 540–41.Google Scholar

4 Ibid.Google Scholar

5 Cited in Levine, Lawrence, “The Unpredictable Past: Reflections on Recent American Historiography.” American Historical Review 94 (June 1989): 671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Bailyn, Bernard, “The Problems of the Working Historian: A Comment,” in Philosophy and History A Symposium. ed. Hook, Sidney (New York, 1963), 94.Google Scholar

7 Graff, Harvey, The Legacies of Literacy: Continuities and Contradictions in Western Culture and Society (Bloomington, 1987); Houston, R. A., Literacy in Early Modern Europe: Culture and Education, 1500–1800 (New York, 1988).Google Scholar

8 Stone, Lawrence, “Literacy and Education in England, 1640–1900,” Past and Present 42 (1969): 69–139.Google Scholar

9 Sanderson, Michael, “Literacy and Social Mobility in the Industrial Revolution in England,” Past and Present 56 (1972): 75–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Laqueur, Thomas W., “Literacy and Social Mobility in the Industrial Revolution,” Past and Present 64 (1974): 96–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 Furet, François and Ozouf, Jacques, Lire et Écrire: L'alphabetisation des francois de Calvin à Jules Ferry (Paris, 1977), published in English as Reading and Writing: Literacy in France from Calvin to Jules Ferry (Cambridge, 1982).Google Scholar

12 Kaestle, Carl F. and Vinovskis, Maris A., Education and Social Change in Nineteenth-Century Massachusetts (New York, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 See Kaestle, Carl F. et al., Literacy in the United States: Readers and Reading since 1880 (New Haven, Conn., 1991), ch. 2.Google Scholar