1 Ravitch, Diane, The Troubled Crusade: American Education, 1945–1980 (New York, 1983), 264–65; Spring, Joel, The Sorting Machine: National Education Policy since 1945 (New York, 1976), 93–95.Google Scholar

2 Efron, Alexander, The Teaching of Physical Sciences in the Secondary Schools of the United States, France, and Soviet Russia (New York, 1937), 22.Google Scholar

3 Fuller, Robert W., Brownlee, Raymond B., and Baker, D. Lee, First Principles of Physics (Boston, 1933), iii. Another popular textbook of the era, Dull's, Charles E. Modern Physics (1939), offered the same arrangement of chapters on classical physics and ended with two chapters covering modern developments, such as X rays, the radio, radioactivity, the automobile, and the airplane. Although the text reflected the classical curriculum, the book attempted to tie physics education to modern technology through abundant photos illustrating the applications of physical science, from the Golden Gate Bridge and Boulder Dam to cream separators and chlorine factories. Dull, Charles E., Modern Physics (New York, 1939). New Elementary Physics (1936) by Robert Millikan and Gordon Gale, physics professors at Cal Tech and Chicago, respectively, mirrored the content of the other two books written by high school teachers. Millikan, Robert A. and Gale, Henry Gordon, New Elementary Physics (New York, 1936).Google Scholar

4 Peters, J. T., “A Physics Teacher Faces His Problems,” School Science and Math 41 (June 1941): 562.Google Scholar

5 Efron, , Teaching of Physical Sciences, 97–98, 266–68.Google Scholar

6 Culp, W. R., “A Study of Lab Apparatus in Physics in a Number of First Class Small Town High Schools in Northwest Missouri,” Science Education 24 (Apr. 1940): 213–20; Trytten, M. H., “A Study of Secondary School Physics,” American Journal of Physics 8 (Feb. 1940): 56.Google Scholar

7 Efron, , Teaching of Physical Sciences, 16.Google Scholar

8 Harrington, Charles B., “Why the Decrease in Enrollment and What We Can Do about It,” School Science and Math 40 (June 1940): 569.Google Scholar

9 DeBoer, George E., A History of Ideas in Science Education: Implications for Practice (New York, 1991), 99.Google Scholar

10 Progressive Education Association Commission on Secondary School Curriculum, Science in General Education: Suggestions for Science Teachers in Secondary Schools … (New York, 1938), 23; Tanner, Daniel and Tanner, Laurel, History of the School Curriculum (New York, 1990), 222.Google Scholar

11 Cremin, Lawrence A., The Transformation of the School: Progressivism in American Education, 1876–1957 (New York, 1961), 248, 274–75.Google Scholar

12 DeBoer, , A History of Ideas, 100–101.Google Scholar

13 Brown, H. Emmett, “The Plight of High School Physics,” School Science and Math 40 (Feb. 1940): 157; Ruchlis, Hyman, “Humanizing the Physics Course,” High Points 21 (Oct. 1939): 48.Google Scholar

14 Millikan, Robert A., “The Opportunity of the Physics Teacher,” American Journal of Physics 9 (Apr. 1941): 81–82.Google Scholar

15 Compton, Arthur H., “War Problems of the Physics Teacher,” American Journal of Physics 10 (Apr. 1942): 93; Condon, E. U., “A Physicists' Peace,” American Journal of Physics 10 (Apr. 1942): 96; Stewart, G. W., “Social Implications of Physics,” American Journal of Physics 11 (Feb. 1943): 44; Knudsen, Vern O., “The Physicist in the New World,” American Journal of Physics 11 (Apr. 1943): 74.Google Scholar

16 Heil, Louis M., “The Science Teacher and the War Effort,” Progressive Education 20 (Feb. 1943): 71; Beam, Rachel, “War Courses in Science for Girls,” High Points 25 (Nov. 1943): 69–70.Google Scholar

17 Warner, Glen W., “What Can the Schools Do for America?” School Science and Math 42 (Mar. 1942): 206.Google Scholar

18 Cope, Thomas D., “‘Raising the Masses’ is a Problem in Physics,” School Science and Math 42 (Dec. 1942): 817–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 Havighurst, R. J. and Lark-Horovitz, K., “The Schools in a Physicist's War,” American Journal of Physics 11 (Apr. 1943): 103.Google Scholar

20 Morse, Charles K., “High School Physics and the War,” American Journal of Physics 10 (Dec. 1942): 334; Kevles, Daniel J., The Physicists: The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America (Cambridge, Mass., 1987), 320.Google Scholar

21 Johnson, Philip G., “Planning Your High School Physics Courses,” School Science and Math 49 (Mar. 1949): 210; Hurd, Paul, “The Case against High School Physics,” School Science and Math 53 (June 1953): 439. Many local studies of physics education, such as those done in Oklahoma and the Pittsburgh area, confirmed the bleak picture. Maneval, M. V., “Status of Physics in Oklahoma High Schools,” Science Education 35 (Dec. 1951): 241; and Kelly, W. C., “Report on the Pittsburgh Conference on the Need for High School Physics in an Industrial Community,” American Journal of Physics 25 (May 1957): 331–32.Google Scholar

22 Kevles, , The Physicists, 375; Johnson, , “Planning Your High School Physics Courses,” 213.Google Scholar

23 Bain, Sherwood C., “A Tentative Reconsideration of Principles Underlying the High School Course in Physics,” School Science and Math 46 (Nov. 1946): 721; idem, “Some Broader Educational Aspects of Physics Problem Solving,” School Science and Math 48 (Oct. 1948): 538; Johnson, , “Planning Your High School Physics Courses,” 204.Google Scholar

24 Johnson, , “Planning Your High School Physics Courses,” 204–5.Google Scholar

25 Lefler, R. W., “The Teaching of Laboratory Work in High School Physics,” School Science and Math 47 (June 1947): 534–38.Google Scholar

26 Ruchlis, Hyman, “New Approaches Needed in Physics,” Science Teacher 20 (Feb. 1953): 14.Google Scholar

27 Ibid.; Gross, E. Wayne, “Do You Have a Service Station Handy?” School Science and Math 53 (Oct. 1953): 555–56.Google Scholar

28 Swales, Willis Jr., “Physics for All: An Important Thought for Our Nation,” School Science and Math 57 (Mar. 1957): 220.Google Scholar

29 Davis, James B., “For the Ladies, Kitchen Physics,” Science Teacher 18 (Oct. 1951): 193; Lynde, C. J., “High School Physics in Popular Dress,” Science Teacher 23 (Nov. 1956): 353.Google Scholar

30 A full list of replacements for traditional physics classes included: 1) Generalized Science, 2) Consumer Science, 3) Senior Science, 4) Applied Science, 5) Basic Science, 6) Practical Science, 7) Industrial Science, 8) Girls' Science, 9) Popular Science, 10) Modern Science, 11) Physical Science, 12) World Science, 13) Advanced Physical Science, 14) Applied Physics, 15) Advanced General Science, 16) General Physics, 17) Descriptive Physics, 18) Advanced Science, and 19) Vocational Science. Hurd, , “The Case against High School Physics,” 439–49.Google Scholar

31 Blackwood, Oswald H., Herron, Wilmer B., and Kelly, William C., High School Physics (Boston, 1954); Bower, Ernest O. and Robinson, Edward P., Dynamic Physics (Chicago, 1955); Brown, H. Emmett and Schwachtgen, Edward C., Physics: The Story of Energy (Boston, 1954); Burns, Elmer E., Verwiebe, Frank L., Hazel, Herbert C., and Van Hooft, Gordon E., Physics: A Basic Science (New York, 1954); Dull, Charles E., Metcalfe, H. Clark, and Brooks, William O., Modern Physics (New York, 1955); Marcus, Abraham, Physics for Modern Times (New York, 1952); Nelson, Ole A. and Winans, John G., Everyday Physics (Boston, 1952); Ruchlis, Hyman and Lemon, Harvey B., Exploring Physics (New York, 1952).Google Scholar

32 Ruchlis, and Lemon, , Exploring Physics, 1–14.Google Scholar

29 Davis, James B., “For the Ladies, Kitchen Physics,” Science Teacher 18 (Oct. 1951): 193; Lynde, C. J., Davis, James B., “High School Physics in Popular Dress,” Science Teacher 23 (Nov. 1956): 353.Google Scholar

30 A full list of replacements for traditional physics classes included: 1) Generalized Science, 2) Consumer Science, 3) Senior Science, 4) Applied Science, 5) Basic Science, 6) Practical Science, 7) Industrial Science, 8) Girls' Science, 9) Popular Science, 10) Modern Science, 11) Physical Science, 12) World Science, 13) Advanced Physical Science, 14) Applied Physics, 15) Advanced General Science, 16) General Physics, 17) Descriptive Physics, 18) Advanced Science, and 19) Vocational Science. Hurd, , “The Case against High School Physics,” 439–49.Google Scholar

31 Blackwood, Oswald H., Herron, Wilmer B., and Kelly, William C., High School Physics (Boston, 1954); Bower, Ernest O. and Robinson, Edward P., Dynamic Physics (Chicago, 1955); Brown, H. Emmett and Schwachtgen, Edward C., Physics: The Story of Energy (Boston, 1954); Burns, Elmer E., Verwiebe, Frank L., Hazel, Herbert C., and Van Hooft, Gordon E., Physics: A Basic Science (New York, 1954); Dull, Charles E., Metcalfe, H. Clark, and Brooks, William O., Modern Physics (New York, 1955); Marcus, Abraham, Physics for Modern Times (New York, 1952); Nelson, Ole A. and Winans, John G., Everyday Physics (Boston, 1952); Ruchlis, Hyman and Lemon, Harvey B., Exploring Physics (New York, 1952).Google Scholar

32 Ruchlis, and Lemon, , Exploring Physics, 1–14.Google Scholar

33 Nelson, and Winans, , Everyday Physics, iv; Nelson, O. A., “Teaching Physics as We Use It,” School Science and Math 47 (Dec. 1947): 829–34.Google Scholar

34 Nelson, , “Teaching Physics as We Use It,” 829–34.Google Scholar

35 Swann, W. F. G., “The Teaching of Physics,” American Journal of Physics 19 (Mar. 1951): 185; Pippert, Glen and Roller, Duane E., “Making the Laboratory a More Effective Scientific Experience,” American Journal of Physics 21 (Nov. 1953): 617.Google Scholar

36 Michels, Walter C., “Authoritarianism versus Imagination in Physics Teaching,” American Journal of Physics 25 (Feb. 1957): 84, 88.Google Scholar

37 “A Physicist on the Go,” New York Times, 16 Nov. 1959; Spring, , The Sorting Machine, 113.Google Scholar

38 “Physics Teaching Enters Atom Age,” New York Times, 16 Nov. 1959; Little, Elbert P., “From These Beginnings …” Science Teacher 24 (Nov. 1957): 316–19.Google Scholar

39 The eight schools in the initial trial of PSSC Physics were: Phillips Exeter Academy, Exeter, N.H.; Browne and Nichols School, Cambridge, Mass.; Taunton High School, Taunton, Mass.; Bronx High School of Science, N.Y.; The Hill School, Pottstown, Pa.; The George School, Westtown, Pa.; Radnor High School, Wayne, Pa.; University High School, Urbana, Ill. “The New Physics Class”, Time, 17 Mar. 1958, 41–42.Google Scholar

40 Physical Science Study Committee, Physics (Boston, 1960), v; “Modern Physics,” New York Times, 13 Mar. 1960; Watson, Fletcher G., “Comments on the Program of the Physical Science Study Committee,” Harvard Educational Review 29 (Winter 1959): 15; DeBoer, , A History of Ideas, 166.Google Scholar

41 Kevles, , The Physicists, 367.Google Scholar

42 Ibid., 341, 343, 366.Google Scholar

43 Ibid., 391; Conant, James B., Education in a Divided World: The Function of the Public Schools in Our Unique Society (Cambridge, Mass., 1948), 36.Google Scholar

44 Paul Hurd, interview by author, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif., 1 May 1992; Mike Atkin, interview by author, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif., 8 May 1992.Google Scholar

45 Physical Science Study Committee, Teacher's Resource Book and Guide, Part 1, Physics (Boston 1965), vii–viii.Google Scholar

46 American Institute of Physics, Physics in Your High School: A Handbook for the Improvement of Physics Courses (New York, 1960), 78–79.Google Scholar

47 Schulz, Richard W., “Quality Science for the Senior High School: A Course in Physics,” National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin 44 (Dec. 1960): 126–37; “Razors at the Frontier,” Time, 29 July 1957, 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

48 American Institute of Physics, Physics in Your High School, 109.Google Scholar

49 “The New Physics Class,” Time, 42.Google Scholar

50 Ibid.; Spring, , The Sorting Machine, 112.Google Scholar

51 Rickover, Hyman George, Education and Freedom (New York, 1959), 23, 33; Whyte, William H. Jr., “The New Illiteracy,” in Public Schools in Crisis , ed. Smith, Mortimer (Chicago, 1956), 109.Google Scholar

52 Spring, , The Sorting Machine, 66–74; Hurd, Paul, New Directions in Teaching Secondary School Science (Chicago, 1969), 4.Google Scholar

53 Rickover, , Education and Freedom, 208.Google Scholar

54 Clowse, Barbara Barksdale, Brainpower for the Cold War: The Sputnik Crisis and the National Defense Education Act of 1958 (Westport, Conn., 1981), 163; Spring, , The Sorting Machine, 98.Google Scholar

55 Marsh, Paul E. and Gortner, Ross A., Federal Aid to Science Education: Two Programs (Syracuse, N.Y., 1963), 89.Google Scholar

56 Finlay, Gilbert, “Summary of Judgments Made by Teachers,” Science Teacher 26 (Dec. 1959): 580–81.Google Scholar

57 Barish, William, “A Criticism of the PSSC Course,” Science Teacher 26 (Oct. 1959): 389; Brauer, Oscar L., “Something Dangerously New in Physics Teaching,” Science Education 47 (Oct. 1963): 365.Google Scholar

58 Poorman, Lawrence Gene, “Indiana Physics Teachers React to PSSC,” Science Education 49 (Mar. 1965): 172.Google Scholar

59 Settle, Ralph D., “How Much Laboratory and What Kind?” School Science and Mathematics 62 (Oct. 1962): 480–82; Cremin, , The Transformation of the School, vii.Google Scholar

60 Hurd, , New Directions, 49.Google Scholar

61 DeBoer, , A History of Ideas, 166.Google Scholar

62 Examples of new curricula geared toward middle school students included the Introduction to Physical Science Program, the Intermediate Science Curriculum Study Project, and the Time, Space, Matter curriculum. Hurd, , New Directions, 193–94; Swartz, Clifford, “The Physicists Intervene,” Physics Today 44 (Sep. 1991): 25–26.Google Scholar

63 Kleinman, Gladys S., “All Is Not Lost: The High School Physics Enrollment Picture Is Not as Black as It Seems,” Physics Teacher 3 (Mar. 1965): 121; “A Third Course,” Physics Teacher 3 (Apr. 1965): 169.Google Scholar

64 “Revolt against Physics?” New York Times, 12 Feb. 1968.Google Scholar

65 Kevles, , The Physicists, 392.Google Scholar

66 Feldman, Allan and Atkin, J. Myron, “Research in Science Education in the U.S.A.,” Journal of Curriculum Studies (forthcoming).Google Scholar