¹ Brabner, George Jr., “The Myth of Mental Retardation,“ Training School Bulletin 63 (Feb. 1967): 149–52; Dunn, Lloyd M., “Special Education for the Mildly Retarded: Is Much of It Justifiable?” Exceptional Children 35 (Sep. 1968): 5–22; Hurley, R. L., Poverty and Mental Retardation: A Causal Relationship (Trenton, N.J., 1969); Braginsky, Dorothea D. and Braginsky, Benjamin M., Hansels and Gretels: Studies of Children in Institutions for the Mentally Retarded (New York, 1971); Franks, D. J., “Ethnic and Social Status Characteristics of Children in EMR and LD Classes,” Exceptional Children 37 (Mar. 1971): 537–38; Mercer, Jane R., Labeling the Mentally Retarded (Berkeley, Calif., 1973); and United States Government General Accounting Office, Disparities Still Exist in Who Gets Special Education (Washington, D.C., 1981). Reschly, Daniel J., “Minority MMR Overrepresentation and Special Education Reform,” Exceptional Children 54 (Jan. 1988): 320–21, argues that because the numbers of children identified as mildly retarded have declined since 1976, earlier generalizations about their backgrounds may no longer apply. There is little doubt that some poor minority children who might previously have been labeled retarded are today being called learning disabled. See, for example, Sleeter, Christine E., “Learning Disabilities: The Social Construction of a Special Education Category,” Exceptional Children 53 (Sep. 1986): 51–52.Google Scholar

² Heller, Kirby A., Holtzman, Wayne H., and Messick, Samuel, eds., Placing Children in Special Education: A Strategy for Equity (Washington, D.C., 1982).Google Scholar

³ Reschly, Daniel J., “Beyond IQ Test Bias: The National Academy's Panel's Analysis of Minority EMR Overrepresentation,“ Educational Researcher 13 (Mar. 1984): 18 (emphasis in the original).Google Scholar

⁴ For the views of Goddard's contemporaries, see Terman, Lewis M., The Measurement of Intelligence (Cambridge, Mass., 1916): 6; Fernald, Walter E., “Thirty Years Progress in the Care of the Feeble-Minded,“ Journal of Psycho-Asthenics 29 (1924): 213; and Davies, Stanley P., Social Control of the Mentally Deficient (New York, 1930): 55. More recent expressions are found in Stanley Raymond, C., “Retrospect and Prospect on Mental Deficiency,” American Journal of Mental Deficiency 49 (July 1944): 11; Burtt, H. E. and Pressey, S. L., “Henry Herbert Goddard, 1866–1957,” American Journal of Psychology 70 (Dec. 1957): 656–57; Kanner, Leo, A History of the Care and Study of the Mentally Retarded (Springfield, Ill., 1964), 123–24; Irvine, Paul, “Henry Herbert Goddard, 1866–1957: A Biographical Sketch,” Journal of Special Education 5 (Fall 1971): 210; Tyor, Peter L. and Bell, Leland V., Caring for the Retarded in America: A History (Westport, Conn., 1984), 111; and Hahn Raffter, Nicole, ed., White Trash: The Eugenic Family Studies, 1877–1919 (Boston, 1988), 10.Google Scholar

⁵ Dain, Norman, Concepts of Insanity in the United States, 1789–1865 (New Brunswick, N.J., 1964), 15–22. On Rush's life and thought see Freeman Hawke, David, Benjamin Rush: Revolutionary Gadfly (Indianapolis, 1971); and Boorstin, Daniel J., The Lost World of Thomas Jefferson (New York, 1948).Google Scholar

⁶ Carlson, Eric T. and Simpson, Meribeth M., “Benjamin Rush's Medical Use of the Moral Faculty,“ Bulletin of the History of Medicine 39 (Jan.–Feb. 1965): 22.Google Scholar

⁷ Rush, Benjamin, “The Influence of Physical Causes upon the Moral Faculty [1786],“ in Selected Writings of Benjamin Rush, ed. Runes, Dagobert D. (New York, 1947), 182.Google Scholar

⁸ Rush, Benjamin, Medical Inquiries and Observations upon the Diseases of the Mind, 4th ed. (Philadelphia, 1830), 262.Google Scholar

⁹ Ibid., 25.Google Scholar

¹⁰ In addition to being a leader in mental deficiency, Howe pioneered in the special education of the blind. In the 1830s he guided the Perkins School for the Blind into becoming the world's leading facility for the blind. For his work with Laura Bridgman, see Swift Lamson, Mary, Life and Education of Laura Dewey Bridgman, the Deaf, Dumb, and Blind Girl (Boston, 1879). Howe's work in special education (as well as other aspects of Howe's life), is the subject of Schwartz, Harold, Samuel Gridley Howe: Social Reformer, 1801–1876 (Cambridge, Mass., 1956).Google Scholar

¹¹ Davies, John D., Phrenology: Fad and Science: A Nineteenth-Century American Crusade (New Haven, Conn., 1955).Google Scholar

¹² Schwartz, Harold, “Samuel Gridley Howe as Phrenologist,“ American Historical Review 57 (Apr. 1952): 644–51.Google Scholar

¹³ The importance of religion during this period as a source for work with the mentally deficient is commented upon by Haskell, Robert H., “Mental Deficiency over a Hundred Years: a Brief Historical Sketch of Trends in the Field,“ American Journal of Psychiatry 100 (Apr. 1944): 111; Milligan, Glenn E., “History of the American Association on Mental Deficiency,” American Journal of Mental Deficiency 66 (Nov. 1961): 358; Grob, Gerald N., “The State Mental Hospital in Mid-Nineteenth Century America: A Social Analysis,” American Psychologist 21 (June 1966): 511; and Tyor, and Bell, , Caring for the Retarded, 15.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Gridley Howe, Samuel, Report Made to the Legislature of Massachusetts upon Idiocy (Boston, 1848), 4. According to Fernald, Walter E., The History of the Treatment of the Feeble-Minded (Boston, 1893), 6, Howe's report was widely read in the United States and in Europe and was still considered seminal material as late as the 1890s.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Howe, , Report to the Legislature 16–17.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Davies, , Phrenology Fad and Science 166.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Gridley Howe, Samuel, On the Causes of Idiocy (1848; reprint ed., New York, 1972), 2–3.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Schwartz, , “Samuel Gridley Howe as Phrenologist,“ 647.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Brockett, L. P., “Idiots and Institutions for Their Training,“ American Journal of Education 1 (May 1856): 601.Google Scholar

²⁰ Ibid., 603.Google Scholar

²¹ Park, Edward A., “Introduction,“ in Swift Lamson, Mary, Laura Dewey Bridgman (Boston, 1878), xxx.Google Scholar

²² Schwartz, , Samuel Gridley Howe 85, 144.Google Scholar

²³ Howe, , Report to the Legislature 21.Google Scholar

²⁴ Howe, , On the Causes 7.Google Scholar

²⁵ Ibid., 19.Google Scholar

²⁶ Werlinder, Henry, Psychopathy: A History of the Concept (Stockholm, 1978), 21–24.Google Scholar

²⁷ On moral treatment, see Kraft, Ivor, “Edouard Seguin and Nineteenth Century Moral Treatment of Idiots,“ Bulletin of the History of Medicine 35 (Sep.–Oct. 1961): 393–418; and Grob, , “The State Mental Hospital,” 510–23.Google Scholar

²⁸ Fink, Arthur E., Causes of Crime: Biological Theories in the United States, 1800–1915 (1938; reprint ed., New York, 1962), 48. On the origins and development of the idea of moral insanity in the United States, see Fink, Causes of Crime, 48–75. Carlson, Eric T. and Dain, Norman, “The Meaning of Moral Insanity,“ Bulletin of the History of Medicine 36 (Mar.–Apr. 1962): 130–40; Dain, , Concepts of Insanity, 73–82; and Werlinder, , Psychopathy, 36–51.Google Scholar

²⁹ Fink, , Causes of Crime 74.Google Scholar

³⁰ See, for example, Ray, Isaac, “Life and Trial of Dr. Abner Baker, Jr.,“ American Journal of Insanity 3 (July 1846): 26–35; “Trial of Willard Clark, Indicted for the Murder of Richard W. Wight,” American Journal of Insanity 12 (Jan. 1856): 212–37; “The Plea of Insanity in Cases of Homicide, As Illustrated in the Trial of Samuel S. Rich,” American Journal of Insanity 16 (Apr. 1860): 369–84; and Ordonaux, John, “Moral Insanity,” American Journal of Insanity 29 (Jan. 1873): 313–40.Google Scholar

³¹ Rosenberg, Charles E., The Trial of the Assassin Guiteau: Psychiatry and Law in the Gilded Age (Chicago, 1968), 102.Google Scholar

³² Carlson, and Dain, , “Meaning of Moral Insanity,“ 136.Google Scholar

³³ The source of degeneracy theory was the Frenchman Benedict August Morel (1809–73), whose ideas were widely accepted by psychiatrists and neurologists between 1860 and 1910. On Morel's theory and influence, see Haller, Mark H., Eugenics: Hereditarian Attitudes in American Thought (New Brunswick, N.J., 1963), 14–17; Rosenberg, Charles E., No Other Gods: On Science and American Social Thought (Baltimore, 1976), 42–44; and Werlinder, , Psychopathy, 57–67.Google Scholar

³⁴ Haller, , Eugenics 15, 17.Google Scholar

³⁵ Rosenberg, , Trial of Guiteau 106.Google Scholar

³⁶ Fink, , Causes of Crime 69–73, covers the Guiteau trial as it relates to the issue of moral insanity; and Rosenberg, Trial of Guiteau, covers the trial, especially its psychiatric aspects, comprehensively.Google Scholar

³⁷ Rosenberg, , Trial of Guiteau 106.Google Scholar

³⁸ Ibid., 185.Google Scholar

³⁹ Ibid., 157.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Ibid., 163.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Ibid., 243–44.Google Scholar

⁴² Fink, , Causes of Crime 72.Google Scholar

⁴³ Kiernan, James G., “Moral Insanity—What Is It?“ Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 11 (Oct. 1884): 556; Howe, , Report to the Legislature, 21.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Gelb, Steven A., “Social Deviance and the ‘Discovery’ of the Moron,“ Disability, Handicap and Society 2 (1987): 247–58.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Faculty psychology, however, remained a strong influence on the field of mental deficiency well into the 1890s. Fernald, , History of the Treatment 13; Springer, Alice M., “Attention,“ Journal of Psycho-Asthenics 1 (Mar. 1897): 85; and “Minutes of the Association,” Journal of Psycho-Asthenics 3 (Sept. 1898): 26, are all examples of its vitality in that decade.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Carlson, and Dain, , “Meaning of Moral Insanity,“ 138; Rosenberg, , Trial of Guiteau 101. The theme was also reflected in popular literature. For example, in Jack London, The Sea-Wolf (New York, 1903), 98, the character of Wolf Larsen is described as “a magnificent atavism, a man so purely primitive that he was of the type that came into the world before the development of the moral nature.”Google Scholar

⁴⁷ See, for example, Dugdale, Richard L., The Jukes: A Study in Crime, Pauperism, Disease, and Heredity 4th ed. (New York, 1910), 55–57; and Burd, Henry M., “Imbecility with Insanity,“ American Journal of Insanity 45 (Oct. 1888): 261.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Kerlin, Isaac N., “Juvenile Insanity,“ Proceedings of the Association of Medical Officers of American Institutions for Idiotic and Feeble-Minded Persons [1879] (Philadelphia, 1879), 3: 87–94. The quotation is from page 94.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Kerlin, Isaac N., “Moral Imbecility,“ Proceedings of the Association of Medical Officers of American Institutions for Feeble-Minded and Idiotic Persons [1887] (Philadelphia, 1889), 9: 35.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Kerlin, Isaac N., “The Organization of Establishments for the Idiotic and Imbecile Class,“ Proceedings of the Association of Medical Officers of American Institutions for Feeble-Minded and Idiotic Persons [1877] (Philadelphia, 1877), 2: 20.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Kerlin, , “Moral Imbecility,“ 37.Google Scholar

⁵² Broomall, John M., “The Helpless Classes,“ Proceedings of the Association of Medical Officers of American Institutions for Feeble-Minded and Idiotic Persons [1887] (Philadelphia, 1889), 9: 40; see also, Kerlin, Isaac N., “The Moral Imbecile,” Proceedings of the National Conference of Charities and Corrections (Boston, 1890), 17: 244–50.Google Scholar

⁵³ For examples of concern, see Barr, Martin W., “President's Address,“ Journal of Psycho-Asthenics 2 (Sept. 1897): 1–14; Fernald, Walter E., “The Imbecile with Criminal Instincts,” Journal of Psycho-Asthenics 14 (Sept. and Dec. 1909, Mar. and June 1910): 16–38; and Haller, , Eugenics, 95–112.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Wiebe, Robert H., The Search for Order, 1877–1920 (New York, 1967), 76–110. On opposition to the new immigration, see Barbara Miller Solomon, Ancestors and Immigrants: A Changing New England Tradition (Cambridge, Mass., 1956).Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Gelb, , “Social Deviance,“ 250.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ See, for example, Fort, Samuel J., “President's Address,“ Journal of Psycho-Asthenics 1 (Sept. 1896): 30–32; “Minutes of the Association, 21st Session,” Journal of Psycho-Asthenics 2 (Sept. 1897): 35–36; and “Minutes of the Association, 22d Session,” Journal of Psycho-Asthenics 3 (Sept. 1898): 27.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ On the tension caused by judges’ unwillingness to recognize moral imbecility, see “Discussion of To Whom May the Term Feeble-Minded be Applied', by Wilmarth, A. W.,” Journal of Psycho-Asthenics 10 (Mar. 1906): 207–9.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Fernald, , “Imbecile with Criminal Instincts,“ 31.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Gelb, Steven A., “Judicial Concerns and Acceptance of Mental Testing in the United States“ (Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Cheiron Society, Princeton, June 1988).Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Fernald, , “Care of the Feeble-Minded,“ 385.Google Scholar

⁶¹ Davies, , Social Control 58–93.Google Scholar

⁶² Fernald, , “Care of the Feeble-Minded,“ 385–86.Google Scholar

⁶³ See, for example, Carson, J. C., “A Case of Moral Imbecility,“ Proceedings of the Association of Medical Officers of American Institutions for Idiotic and Feeble-Minded Persons [1886] (Philadelphia, 1887), 10: 409; and Barr, Martin W., Mental Defectives: Their History, Treatment, and Training (1904; reprint ed., New York, 1973), 101.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Fernald, , “Care of the Feeble-Minded,“ 386.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Ibid., 388.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Stanford, E. C. to Goddard, Henry H., 9 Feb. 1906, Stanley Hall, G. to Goddard, , 9 Feb. 1906, Goddard, Henry H. Papers, Archives of the History of American Psychology, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Münsterberg, Hugo, On the Witness Stand: Essays on Psychology and Crime (New York, 1908), 235–36. On Münsterberg's life and influence see Hale, Matthew Jr., Human Science and Social Order: Hugo Münsterberg and the Origins of Applied Psychology (Philadelphia, 1980).Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Fernald, , “Imbecile with Criminal Instincts,“ 34.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Goddard, Henry H., in “Discussion of The Imbecile with Criminal Instincts’ by Fernald, Walter,” Journal of Psycho-Asthenics 14 (Sept. and Dec. 1909, Mar. and June 1910): 37.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Fernald, , “Imbecile with Criminal Instincts,“ 35. On Goddard's views see, for example, David Smith, J., Mind's Made Feeble: The Myth and Legacy of the Kallikaks (Rockville, Md., 1985).Google Scholar

⁷¹ Fernald, , “Imbecile with Criminal Instincts,“ 33. For other expressions of this very representative view, see, for example, Bicknell, E. P., “Custodial Care of the Adult Feeble-Minded,“ Journal of Psycho-Asthenics 1 (Dec. 1896): 51–63; Harrison Town, Clara, “Mental Types of Juvenile Delinquents, Considered in Relation to Treatment,” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 4 (May 1913): 87; Goddard, Henry H., “The Basis for State Policy: Social Investigation and Prevention,” The Survey, 2 Mar. 1912, pp. 1852–56; and MacDonald, Carlos F., “President's Address,” American Journal of Insanity 71 (July 1914): 7.Google Scholar

⁷² For a discussion of the adoption of Goddard's classification by the American Association on Feeble-Mindedness, see Zenderland, Leila, “The Debate over Diagnosis: Henry Herbert Goddard and the Medical Acceptance of Intelligence Testing,“ in Psychological Testing and American Society, 1890–1930, ed. Sokal, Michael M. (New Brunswick, N.J., 1987), 46–74.Google Scholar

⁷³ Binet, Alfred and Simon, Theodore, “Le developpement de I'intelligence chez les enfants,“ L'Anee psychologique 14 (1908): 87–88.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Goddard, Henry H., “Four Hundred Feeble-Minded Children Classified by the Binet Method,“ Journal of Psycho-Asthenics 15 (Sept. and Dec. 1910): 29–30.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Ibid., 27.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Goddard, Henry H., “Two Thousand Normal Children Measured by the Binet Measuring Scale of Intelligence,“ Pedagogical Seminary 18 (June 1911): 232–59; and Goddard, Henry H., “Ungraded Classes,” Report on Educational Aspects of the Public School System of the City of New York, Part II, Subdivision I Section E, 1911–1912 (New York, 1912).Google Scholar

⁷⁷ Goddard, , “Four-Hundred Feeble-Minded Children,“ 29–30.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Goddard's main innovation was in having used the Binet-Simon test to support this idea. As noted earlier, the argument that the moral imbecile was a person whose mental development was arrested just below that of a normal adult had been part and parcel of degeneracy theory for decades. Dugdale, , The Jukes 57, for example, reasoned similarly in 1877.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ Rogers, A. C. to Goddard, , 25 Nov. 1910, Goddard, to Rogers, , 29 Nov. 1910, Goddard Papers.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ Marks, Russell, “Legitimating Industrial Capitalism: Philanthropy and Individual Differences,“ in Philanthropy and Cultural Imperialism, ed. Arnove, Robert F. (Bloomington, Ind., 1982), 87–122.Google Scholar

⁸¹ Goddard, Henry H., The Kallikak Family: A Study in the Heredity of Feeble-Mind–edness (New York, 1912).Google Scholar

⁸² Goddard, Henry H., Human Efficiency and Levels of Intelligence (Princeton, 1920), 98.Google Scholar

⁸³ Hallahan, Daniel P. and Kauffman, James M., Exceptional Children: Introduction to Special Education (Englewood Cliff, N.J., 1978), 18.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ Mercer, , Labeling the Mentally Retarded. See, for example, Patrick, Joleen L. and Reschly, Daniel J., “Relationship of State Educational Criteria and Demographic Variables to School-System Prevalence of Mental Retardation,“ American journal of Mental Deficiency 86 (Jan. 1982): 351–60.Google Scholar

⁸⁵ Gelb, Steven A. and Mizokawa, Donald T., “Special Education and Social Structure: The Commonality of ‘Exceptionality,'“ American Educational Research Journal 23 (Winter 1986): 543–57.Google Scholar

⁸⁶ Wright Mills, C., The Sociological Imagination (New York, 1959), 8–9.Google Scholar