¹ See Loach, Judi, “Architecture and Urban Space: London,” in Urban Achievement in Early Modern Europe: Golden Ages in Antwerp, Amsterdam, and London, eds. O'Brien, Patrick, et al. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001); David Harris Sachs, “London's Dominion: The Metropolis, the Market Economy, and the State,” in Material London, ca. 1600, ed. Orlin, Lena Cowen (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2000), 20–21; London, 1500–1700: The Making of the Metropolis, eds. Beier, A. L. and Finlay, Roger (London: Longman, 1986); Steve Rappaport, Worlds Within Worlds: Structures of Life in Sixteenth-Century London (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

² Harold Cook developed the concept of a “medical marketplace” in which the College of Physicians sought to retain a position of authority, but found its prestige increasingly threatened by rival medical practitioners over the course of the seventeenth century. The Decline of the Old Medical Regime in Stuart London (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986); “Good Advice and Little Medicine: The Professional Authority of Early Modern English Physicians,” Journal of British Studies 33 (1994): 1–31; cf. Jenner, Mark and Wallis, Patrick, “The Medical Marketplace,” in Medicine and the Market in England and its Colonies (Hampshire: Palgrave McMillan, 2007), 1–12. Wallis and Jenner assert that economic interpretations of the medical marketplace should also be broadened to include medical pluralism and the complex cultural transformations effected by print and public culture.Google Scholar

³ For a general overview of the Apothecaries’ Company, see Juanita Burnby, A Study of the English Apothecary from 1660–1760 (London: Wellcome Trust, 1983) and Charles Raymond Booth Barrett, The History of the Society of Apothecaries of London (London: Stock, 1905).Google Scholar

⁴ Abbott, Andrew, The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵ On the concept of social disciplining, see Stuart, Kathy, Defiled Trades and Social Outcasts: Honor and Ritual Pollution in Early Modern Germany (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 4–6; Roper, Lyndal, Oedipus and the Devil: Witchcraft, Sexuality and Religion in Early Modern Europe (London and New York: Routledge, 1994), 145–67.Google Scholar

⁶ Parry, Noel and Parry, Jose associate professionalization with factors such as autonomy, control of twining, organized occupational structure, and a sense of vocation. See The Rise of the Medical Profession: A Study of Collective Social Mobility (London: Croom Helm, 1976), 48. However, as Rosemary O'Day and Wilfred Prest have asserted, prior to the nineteenth century, the professions did not represent a standardized set of characteristics or uniform identity, and cannot be classified using modern criteria. See Prest, Wilfred, “Introduction: The Professions and Society in Early Modern England,” in The Professions in Early Modern England, ed. Wilfred Prest (London: Croom Helm, 1987), 8; Rosemary O'Day, The Professions in Early Modern England, 1450–1800: Servants of the Commonweal (New York: Longman, 2000), 4.Google Scholar

⁷ Kress, Gunther, et al., Multimodal Teaching and Learning: The Rhetorics of the Science Classroom (London: Continuum, 2001), 1–3.Google Scholar

⁸ See Jones, Peter Murray, “Reading Medicine in Tudor Cambridge,” in The History of Medical Education in Britain, ed. John Harley Warner (Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 1995), 686–94. Physicians viewed the use of vernacular in professional conversations as a sign of inferiority. Margaret Pelling, “Knowledge Common and Acquired: The Education of Unlicensed Medical Practitioners in Early Modern London,” in The History of Medical Education in Britain, ed. Warner, John Harley (Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 1995), 230–49. For an overview of the education of early modern English physicians, see Frederick Noel Lawrence Poynter, “Medical Education in England Since 1600,” in The History of Medical Education in England Since 1600, ed. O'Malley, Charles Donald (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1970), 235–50. Hugh McDonald Sinclair, “Oxford Medicine,” in Medicine in Seventeenth-Century England, ed. Debus, Allen (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974); Bullough, Vern, “Education and Professionalization: An Historical Example,” History of Education Quarterly 2 (1970): 160–69, and O'Malley, Charles Donald, “Medical Education During the Renaissance,” in The History of Medical Education, ed. by O'Malley, Charles Donald (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1970), 89–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

⁹ See Pelling, Margaret, Medical Conflicts in Early Modern London: Patronage, Physicians, and Irregular Practitioners 1550–1640 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003); Pelling, Margaret, The Common Lot: Sickness, Medical Occupations and the Urban Poor in Early Modern England (London: Longman, 1998); Wear, Andrew, Knowledge and Practice in English Medicine 1550–1680 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), and Cook, Harold, The Decline of the Old Medical Regime (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 1986).Google Scholar

¹⁰ Cavallo, Sandra, Artisans of the Body in Early Modern Italy: Identities, Families and Masculinities (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2007), 245.Google Scholar

¹¹ Fissell, Mary, “The Marketplace of Print,” in Medicine and the Market in England and its Colonies, c. 1450–1850, eds. Jenner, Mark S. R. and Wallis, Patrick (Houndsmills and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), 110.Google Scholar

¹² Woodall, John, The Surgion's Mate (London: Edward Griffin, 1617), ¶3r.Google Scholar

¹³ Cressy, David contends that most of London's apprentices and servants were “extraordinarily literate.” Literacy and the Social Order: Reading and Writing in Tudor and Stuart England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), 129. Cressy interprets the ability to sign one's name on official documents, such as the Protestation Returns, as a measure of literacy. Margaret Ferguson argues that Cressy's statistics are unreliable and may in fact underestimate literacy rates. Dido's Daughters: Literacy, Gender, and Empire in Early Modern England and France (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003), 77.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Defining literacy in early modern England is fraught with controversy, since it privileges the text over the word and does not account for the varying degrees of reading and writing ability that existed. See Adam Fox, Oral and Literate Culture in England, 1500–1700 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000; reprint, 2005).Google Scholar

¹⁵ Smith, Pamela defines the transmission of productive knowledge through imitation and manual labor as “artisanal literacy.” See The Body of the Artisan: Art and Experience in the Scientific Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004), 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁶ Court Minutes of the Barber-Surgeons’ Company of London 13 July 1612; London, Guildhall Library, MS5257/4, fol. 186r; hereafter GL Court Minutes followed by date and MS number.Google Scholar

¹⁷ GL Court Minutes 20 October 1612; MS 5257/4, fol. 196v.Google Scholar

¹⁸ With the expansion of the market in the late sixteenth century, social relations in London were increasingly defined by a culture of credit that placed great emphasis on reputation as a measure of trustworthiness. Muldrew, Craig, Economy of Obligation: The Culture of Credit and Social Relations in Early Modern England (New York: St. Martins Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁹ Cavallo, Sandra asserts that despite traditional assumptions about the polluting nature of surgeons’ contact with bodily effluvia, humoral theory depicts bodily excretions as positive, because they maintained corporeal health. Artisans of the Body, 42–43; cf. Porter, Roy, Bodies Politic: Disease, Death, and Doctors in Britain, 1650–1900 (London: Reaktion Books, 2001); Stuart, Defiled Trades, and Douglas, Mary, Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1966; reprint, 1979).Google Scholar

²⁰ Ian Archer describes the early modern household as a model for the “maintenance of order.” The Pursuit of Stability: Social Relations in Elizabethan London (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 76–78; cf. Rappaport, Worlds Within Worlds, 217–219. Concepts of work in early modern Europe were tied to notions of obedience and servitude that also defined the household setting of apprenticeships. James Fair, Artisans in Europe, 1300–1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000). For a delineation of the typical pattern of apprenticeship training in early modern London, see Kahl, William, The Development of London Livery Companies (Boston: Harvard University Press, 1960); Unwin, George, The Gilds and Companies of London (London: Frank Cass, 1963); Dobson, Jessie and Milnes, R. Walker, Barbers and Barber-Surgeons of London (Oxford: Blackwell, 1979); and Sidney Young, Annals of the Barber-Surgeons of London (New York: AMS Press, 1891; reprint, 1978).Google Scholar

²¹ Mastership was the goal of such arrangements. See Farr, Artisans, 34. Girls ineligible for guild membership could receive their training through informal apprenticeships that were tacitly approved by the Barber-Surgeons’ Company.Google Scholar

²² See Smith, Steven R., “The London Apprentices as Seventeenth-Century Adolescents,” Past & Present 61 (1973): 686–94 and Nagy, Doreen Evenden, Popular Medicine in Seventeenth-Century England (Bowling Green: Bowling Green State University Press, 1988). Although most masters were Company members, the Barber-Surgeons’ Company recognized training provided by the wives and widows of surgeons who were ineligible for admission to the Company livery, but were nevertheless deemed suitable instructors.Google Scholar

²³ GL Court Minutes 20 October 1612; MS 5257/4, fol.196v.Google Scholar

²⁴ GL Court Minutes; MS 5257/3, fol 108v. In 1611, London's Court of Common Council decreed that “no apprentice… shal… during the time of his apprentiship weare any apparel, but of his master's cost, provision, or appointment.” Court of Common Council, 21 January 1611, London, Guildhall Library.Google Scholar

²⁵ Rappaport, Worlds Within Worlds, 294.Google Scholar

²⁶ Farr, Artisans in Europe, 39.Google Scholar

²⁷ Russwurin's conflict-ridden relationship with members of the Barber-Surgeons’ Company is explored in great detail by Deborah Harkness, The Jewel House: Elizabethan London and the Scientific Revolution (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

²⁸ “Briefe of Authority,” 1604, MS Sloane 1445, London, British Library, fol. 14v; hereafter BL Sloane followed by MS number.Google Scholar

²⁹ Treating even the most routine surgical procedures required some grounding in medical theory. See Lawrence, Christopher, “Democratic, Divine, and Heroic: The History and Historiography of Surgery,” Medical Theory, Surgical Practice: Studies in the History of Surgery, ed. Lawrence, Christopher (London and New York: Routledge, 1992) Wear, Knowledge and Practice. Google Scholar

³⁰ Clowes, William, A Briefe and Necessarie Treatise (London: Thomas Cadman, 1585), B3r.Google Scholar

³¹ See Chamberland, Celeste, “Honor, Brotherhood, and the Corporate Ethos of London's Barber-Surgeons’ Company, 1570–1640,” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences. Advance access, published on 1 April 2009 DOI 10.1093/jhmas/jrp005.Google Scholar

³² See Rappaport, Worlds Within Worlds, 277–80.Google Scholar

³³ Cf. Kahl, Development of London Livery Companies; Unwin, Gilds and Companies; Valerie Pearl, “Change and Stability in Seventeenth-Century London,” London Journal 5 (1979): 3–34; Doolittle, I. G., The City of London and its Livery Companies (Dorchester: Gavin Press, 1982); Wallis, Patrick and Anders, Ian Gadd, “Introduction,” in Guilds, Society and Economy in London, 1450–1800, eds. Wallis, Patrick and Gadd, Ian A. (London: Centre for Metropolitan History, 2002), 1–14; and Lawrence, Christopher, “Medical Minds, Surgical Bodies: Corporeality and the Doctors,” in Science Incarnate: Historical Embodiments of Natural Knowledge, eds. Lawrence, Christopher and Shapin, Steven (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988), 156–201.Google Scholar

³⁴ GL Court Minutes 1601; MS 5252/3, fol. 108v.Google Scholar

³⁵ GL Court Minutes 1601; MS 5257/3, fol. 60v.Google Scholar

³⁶ GL Court Minutes 13 October 1573; MS 5257/2, fol. 82v.Google Scholar

³⁷ BL Sloane MS 1445, fol. 15r.Google Scholar

³⁸ GL Court Minutes 1601; MS 5257/5, fol. 60v.Google Scholar

³⁹ GL Court Minutes 7 August 1627; MS 5257/5, fol.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ GL Court Minutes; MS 5257/4, fol.168v. Apprenticeship “was a moral and political socialization as much as it was an initiation to the trade.” Farr, Artisans in Europe. 34.Google Scholar

⁴¹ See Smith, Steven R., “The Ideal and Reality: Apprentice-Master Relationships in Seventeenth-Century London,” History of Education Quarterly 4 (1981): 686–94.Google Scholar

⁴² James Farr's assertion that early modern society was “theoretically structured on the microcosm of the family” serves to underscore the connection between household and occupational affairs. Farr, Artisans in Europe, 33.Google Scholar

⁴³ See Jutte, Robert, “Household and Family Life in Late Sixteenth-Century Cologne: The Weinsberg Family,” Sixteenth Century Journal 27 (1986): 686–94; Foyster, Elizabeth, Manhood in Early Modern England: Honour, Sex, and Marriage (London and New York: Longman, 1999), and Berry, Helen and Foyster, Elizabeth, eds. The Family in Early Modern England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Roughly 8–10 percent of apprentices approved for Company membership were officially trained by their fathers. Some apprentices admitted through patrimony to the Barber-Surgeons’ Company were trained in other occupations and gained admission to the Company by virtue of their family connections. See Young, Annals. Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Smith “Ideal and Reality,” 452.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ According to Steve Rappaport, twenty-four was widely viewed by contemporaries as the age at which a man became an adult capable of marrying and fathering children. Rappaport, Worlds Within Worlds, 325.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ GL Court Minutes; MS 5257/3, fol. 83r.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ The Barber-Surgeons’ Company made some attempts to entrust seasoned surgeons with the task of presenting the lectures after the death of erstwhile lecturer, Matthew, Dr. Gwinne in 1627. The Company's control of the lectures, however, was relatively short lived when in 1632, Charles I ordered Dr. Andrewes, a physician, to perform the duty. See Young, Annals, 334.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Read, Alexander, Workes (London: Richard Thrale, 1650), B1v.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Edwardes, Edward, The Whole Art of Chyrurgery (London: William Sheares, 1639), A2r-v.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Ibid.Google Scholar

⁵² For an overview of the organization and structure of the College of Physicians, see Clark, George, A History of the Royal College of Physicians of London 2 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964). Margaret Pelling builds on the foundations established by Cook by exploring the emergence of conflict between the College of Physicians and so-called irregular practitioners. See Medical Conflicts. Google Scholar

⁵³ See Pelling, Medical Conflicts, 55.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Ibid., 55.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Baker, George, The Composition or Making of the Most Pretious Oil Called Oleum Magistrale (London: John Alde, 1574). See Chamberland, , “Honor, Brotherhood and the Corporate Ethos.”Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Crow, William, “Dedicatory” in William Clowes, A Short and Profitable Treatise (London: Thomas East, 1579), sig. A7v.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ GL Court Minutes; MS 5257/5, fol. 118r.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ GL Court Minutes; MS 5257/3, fol. 282r.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ BL Sloane MS 759, fol.1r.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Read, Alexander, Treatise of the First Part of Chirurgery (London: Richard Thrale, 1638). 21.Google Scholar

⁶¹ Ibid., A4r.Google Scholar

⁶² Read, The Whole Practice, 248–50.Google Scholar

⁶³ Read, Alexander, in particular, was especially critical of Paré's use of ligature following the amputation of limbs, which he deemed inferior to the practice of cautery. “[T]he second is the deligation of the vessell which sendeth forth blood, whether it be veine or artery: this is to be used when great vessels are wounded. Ambrose Parey lib I 1.c.20 would have this meane to be used after the amputation of a member, whom you may reade: but in my judgment his practice is but a troublesome and dangerous toy.” Read, Treatise of the First Part, 12. This footnote requires more explanation for the reader.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Read, Treatise of the First Part, 2. The lectures reflected the influence of the “anatomical renaissance” of the sixteenth century, which was based on the desire to return to original sources as a mode of reforming medicine “according to ancient Greek principles.” Andrew Cunningham, The Anatomical Renaissance: The Resurrection of the Anatomical Projects of the Ancients (Hants: Scolar Press, 1997), 3.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Edwardes, Edward, The Analysis of Chyrurgery (London: F. Constable, 1636), A2r.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ See Furdell, Elizabeth Lane, Publishing and Medicine in Early Modern England (Rochester: Rochester University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Fissell, Mary asserts that “vernacular medical books became a stable category of publication” after 1640. See Fissell, , “The Marketplace of Print,” 112–13. According to Elizabeth Eisenstein, print increased accessibility of information and transformed channels of communication. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change: Communications and Cultural Transformations in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979) and “Unacknowledged Revolution,” American Historical Review 1 (2002): 87–105. Adrian Johns contends that Eisenstein's assertions are overstated and do not adequately take into account shared practices of reading and the difficulty of conveying experimental skills through print. “How to Acknowledge a Revolution,” American Historical Review 1 (2002): 106–25 and The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000).Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Some scholars argue that the ability to sign one's name serves as an “intermediary indicator between ability to read and ability to write.” See Schofield, Roger, “The Measurement of Literacy in Pre-Industrial England,” in Literacy in Traditional Societies, ed. Goody, Jack (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968): 686–94. Based on this assumption, David Cressy contends that the illiteracy rate hovered around 70 percent among men in mid-seventeenth-century England. “Literacy in Seventeenth-Century England: More Evidence,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 8 (1977): 149; and “Levels of Illiteracy.” Margaret Ferguson argues that Cressy's methodology excludes women and nonelites for whom the absence of a signature was not necessarily due to illiteracy, but a more complex set of social factors. See Dido's Daughters. Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Wear, Knowledge and Practice, 231.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Vicary, Thomas, The Englishman's Treasure (London: Thomas Creede, 1596), A3r.Google Scholar

⁷¹ GL Court Minutes 1604; MS 5257/3, fol. 194v.Google Scholar

⁷² Wear, Knowledge and Practice, 50.Google Scholar

⁷³ Vicary, Englishman's Treasure, 4.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Clowes, William, A Right Frutefull and Approved Treatise (London: Edward Alde, 1602), B4v.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Clowes, A Prooved Practice (London: Thomas Orwyn for Thomas Cadman, 1588), B1v.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Baker, George, The Newe Iewell of Health (London: Henrie Denham, 1576), *3r.Google Scholar

⁷⁷ Banister, John, A Needefull, New and Necessarie Treatise (London: Thomas Marsh, 1575), *6r-v.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ BL Sloane MS 364, fol. 4r.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ Vicary, Englishman's Treasure, A4r.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ Ibid.Google Scholar

⁸¹ Ibid, 74.Google Scholar

⁸² Ibid., A3v.Google Scholar

⁸³ Clowes, Prooved Practice, P2v.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ Woodall, John, The Surgion's Mate or Military and Domestique (London: Nicholas Bourne, 1637), A3 v.Google Scholar

⁸⁵ Woodall, John, Surgion's Mate, ¶35.Google Scholar

⁸⁶ GL Court Minutes March 1598; MS 5257/3, fol. 6r.Google Scholar

⁸⁷ See Debus, Allen, The Chemical Promise: Experiment and Mysticism in the Chemical Philosophy, 1550–1800 (Sagamore Beach: Science History Publications, 2006); The English Paracelsians (New York: F Watts, 1966).Google Scholar

⁸⁸ See Alsop, James D., “Sea Surgeons, Health, and England's Maritime Expansion,” The Mariner's Mirror 76 (1990): 686–94; James Watt, “Surgeons of the Mary Rose: The Practice of Surgery in Tudor England,” The Mariner's Mirror 69 (1983): 3–19.Google Scholar

⁸⁹ White, Lorraine, “The Experience of Spain's Early Modern Soldiers: Combat, Warfare and Violence,” War in History 9 (2002): 1–38, Hale, John, War and Society in Renaissance Europe 1450–1620 (London: Sutton, 1985), and Keevil, John, Medicine and the Navy, 1200–1900 (Edinburgh: E & S Livingstone, 1987).Google Scholar

⁹⁰ See Brockliss, Laurence and Jones, Colin, The Medical World of Early Modern France (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

⁹¹ Clowes, William, Profitable and Necessarie Booke (London: Edm. Bollifant for Thomas Dawson, 1596), 22.Google Scholar

⁹² Ibid., D1v.Google Scholar

⁹³ See Chamberland, Celeste, “Between the Hall and the Market: William Clowes and Surgical Self-Fashioning in Elizabethan London,” Sixteenth Century Journal, 41 (2010): 69–89.Google Scholar

⁹⁴ Woodall, The Surgion's Mate, C2r.Google Scholar

⁹⁵ Ibid., B4v.Google Scholar

⁹⁶ Ibid., B6r.Google Scholar