1. Macallum, A. Bruce who graduated in 1880 from the University of Toronto, taught there from 1883 to 1917. During the period 1896 to 1917, he actively promoted the establishment of the Ph.D. degree at Toronto, its extension to a larger number of disciplines, and the creation of a graduate school. In 1917 he resigned his position at the University to undertake the chairmanship of the newly formed National Research Council of Canada.Google Scholar

2. “The Johns Hopkins University Celebration,” University of Toronto Monthly (April 1902), pp. 176–80.Google Scholar

3. Ibid., p. 176.Google Scholar

4. Loudon, James earned the B.A. degree from the University of Toronto in 1862. In 1863 he was appointed tutor in classics and mathematics and in 1875 he became the first Canadian to hold a professorship at the University when he assumed the professorship of mathematics and natural philosophy. He was also the first Canadian president of the University of Toronto, for which he provided dynamic leadership during a period of expansion. For a biography of Loudon see Langton, H. H., James Loudon and the University of Toronto (Toronto, 1927).Google Scholar

5. Johns Hopkins University, Celebration of the Twenty-fifth Anniversary of the Founding of the University and Inauguration of Ira Remsen, LL.D., as President of the University (Baltimore, 1902), p. 2 [hereafter cited as Celebration of the Founding of the University].Google Scholar

6. Ibid., p. 100.Google Scholar

7. Ibid., p. 45.Google Scholar

8. University of Toronto Monthly (June 1902), p. 254, and (June 1903), p. 309.Google Scholar

9. Hug, Elsie A., Seventy-five Years in Education: The Role of the School of Education, New York University, 1890–1965 (New York, 1965), p. 30; Sherwood, Sidney, The Universities of the State of New York, Contributions to American Educational History, ed. Adams, H. B., no. 28 (Washington, 1900), p. 67.Google Scholar

10. Ross, George W. served Ontario as minister of education from 1883 to 1899, when he became premier—a position he held until his party lost the election of 1905. He wrote a political autobiography, Getting into Parliament and After (Toronto, 1913).Google Scholar

11. Price, R. R., The Financial Support of State Universities (Cambridge, 1924); University of Toronto Monthly (March 1901), pp. 203–20; Ross, George W. Hon., Address Delivered on Moving the Second Reading of a Bill re. the University of Toronto in the Legislative Assembly of Ontario, April 1, 1897 (Toronto, 1897); Mulock, W. J. to Ross, March 12, 1897, and Blake, S. H. to Ross, May 10, 1901, Department of Education, University of Toronto and Upper Canada College Correspondence, Series D-7 [hereafter cited as Series D-7], Public Archives of Ontario [hereafter cited as P.A.O.]; see also Varsity and University of Toronto Monthly for 1900–1901.Google Scholar

12. Macallum, A. B., “The University Question in Ontario,“ Varsity, March 12, 1901; “The Presentation of the Portrait of Dr. Loudon,” University of Toronto Monthly (November 1911), pp. 36–37.Google Scholar

13. Loudon, James, “Presidential Address: The Universities in Relation to Research,“ Proceedings of the Royal Society of Canada, 1902, app. A, p. lvii.Google Scholar

14. The Strength of the University (Toronto, 1968), p. 191.Google Scholar

15. Macallum, A. B., “The Foundation of the Board of Graduate Studies,“ University of Toronto Monthly (February 1916), p. 224.Google Scholar

16. Mathews, Robin and Steel, James, The Struggle for Canadian Universities (Toronto, 1970); the Executive and Finance Committee, Canadian Association of University Teachers, “‘Canadianization’ and the University,” in Critical Issues in Canadian Society, ed. Boydell, Craig L. et al. (Toronto, 1971); the 1971–1972 Gerstein Lectures at York University, Toronto, were designed around the theme “Nationalism and the University.”Google Scholar

17. Rudolph, Frederick, The American College and University: A History (New York, 1965), pp. 333–52; Rudy, S. Willis, “The ‘Revolution’ in American Higher Education, 1865–1900,” Harvard Educational Review (21:3), pp. 155–74; Veysey, Laurence, The Emergence of the American University (Chicago, 1965).Google Scholar

18. Quoted in Rudolph, American College and University, p. 333.Google Scholar

19. Rosenberg, Ralph P., “The First American Doctor of Philosophy Degree,“ Journal of Higher Education (October 1961), pp. 387–94; Furniss, Edgar S., The Graduate School of Yale: A Brief History (New Haven, 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20. Rudy, , “The ‘Revolution’ in American Higher Education,“ p. 167; Hawkins, Hugh, Pioneer: A History of Johns Hopkins University, 1874–89 (Ithaca, 1960); Cordasco, Francesco, Daniel Coit Gilman and the Protean Ph.D.: The Shaping of American Graduate Education (Leiden, 1960), pp. 54–115.Google Scholar

21. Rudolph, , American College and University, pp. 346–48.Google Scholar

22. Ibid., p. 395.Google Scholar

23. Celebration of the Founding of the University, p. 80.Google Scholar

24. Veysey, , Emergence of the American University, p. 330.Google Scholar

25. Ben-David, Joseph and Zloczower, Awraham, “Universities and Academic Systems in Modern Societies,” European Journal of Sociology 3 (1962): 45–84. For their explanation of the diffusion of innovation, the authors of this article point to the interaction of a decentralized system of universities in a competitive environment. On pp. 71–76 they discuss the American situation.Google Scholar

26. Nevins, Allan, The State Universities and Democracy (Urbana, Ill., 1962), p. 101.Google Scholar

27. Donnelly, Walter A., ed., The University of Michigan: An Encyclopedic Survey 3 (Ann Arbor, Mich., 1953), quoted on p. 1043.Google Scholar

28. Solberg, Winton U., The University of Illinois, 1867–1894 (Urbana, Ill., 1968), pp. 341–67.Google Scholar

29. Curti, Merle and Cartensen, Vernon, The University of Wisconsin, 1848–1925 1 (Madison, Wise, 1949): 448–49.Google Scholar

30. McHenry, D. C., “The Higher Education of Women,“ Proceedings of the Ontario Educational Association, 1879, p. 75; Coleman, A. P., “A Plea for More Science,” Canada Educational Monthly (March 1880), p. 146; W.H.P., “German Science,” Varsity, October 16, 1880.Google Scholar

31. “Canadian Institute—Occupation of the New Building and Opening Address of Prof. Loudon,” Toronto Mail, January 29, 1877.Google Scholar

32. Minutes of the Senate, April 18, 1874; June 17, 1874; December 8, 1874; December 9, 1874; December 10, 1874, Office of the Registrar, University of Toronto [hereafter cited as U.T.R.].Google Scholar

33. Hunter, J. H., “The University Question,“ Canada Educational Monthly (January 1880), pp. 1–9.Google Scholar

34. Ibid., p. 2.Google Scholar

35. Blake, Edward, Chancellor of the University of Toronto, 1873–1900, graduated from the University, B.A. (1854) and M.A. (1858). He had a controversial career in politics in Ontario, Canada, and Britain. Between 1880 and 1892 he worked to forward Toronto as a national center for higher learning. For a biography see Loudon, James, “Edward Blake,” University of Toronto Monthly (May 1912), and Bissell, C. T., ed., Our Living Tradition (Toronto, 1957).Google Scholar

36. “Chancellor Blake's Address,” Canada Educational Monthly (September 1880), pp. 402–6.Google Scholar

37. Ibid., p. 405.Google Scholar

38. Mills, T. Wesley, “The Johns Hopkins University of Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.,“ Canada Educational Monthly (January 1882), pp. 1–6.Google Scholar

39. Johns Hopkins University, Register of Johns Hopkins University, 1881–82. Google Scholar

40. Minutes of the Senate, January 13, 1882, U.T.R.Google Scholar

41. The nine fellowships were offered in the following departments: French and German, Classics (2 awards), English, Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics, Mineralogy and Geology, and Natural History.Google Scholar

42. Cordasco, , Daniel Coit Gilman, pp. 85–86.Google Scholar

43. For a biography of Daniel Wilson see Langton, H. H., Sir Daniel Wilson, a Memoir (Edinburgh, 1929).Google Scholar

44. Globe, May 18, 1883.Google Scholar

45. Toronto Mail, April 28, 1883; April 30, 1883; May 1, 1883; Globe, June 11, 1883. Varsity, April 21, 1883; October 6, 1883.Google Scholar

46. Minutes of the Senate, May 25, 1883; May 29, 1883; October 20, 1883, U.T.R.Google Scholar

47. Varsity, February 24, 1883; June 2, 1883; January 31, 1885.Google Scholar

48. Minutes of the Senate, 1883–1897, U.T.R.Google Scholar

49. Information on the fellows was compiled from three sources: Morgan, H. J., The Canadian Men and Women of the Time, 1912 (Toronto, 1912); University of Toronto, Register for the University of Toronto for the Year 1920 (Toronto, 1920); Province of Ontario Gazetteer and Directory, 1907–08 (Ingersoll, Ont., 1908).Google Scholar

50. Macallum, , “The Foundation of the Board of Graduate Studies,“ p. 220.Google Scholar

51. Hunter, , “The University Question“; Mills, “The Johns Hopkins University”; Adams, Charles K., “University Education in the United States,“ Canada Education Monthly (April and September 1887), pp. 131–13 and 268–73; Gordy, J. P., “Chairs of Pedagogy,“ ibid. (March 1891), pp. 93–98; Sill, E. R., “Should a College Educate?” ibid. (January and February 1886), pp. 10–13 and 57–62.Google Scholar

52. “Looking to Cornell,” February 2, 1884; Chamberlain, A. F., “The University and the Government—IV ,“ November 7, 1894; Fairclough, H. R., “Stanford University,” January 16, 1895.Google Scholar

53. Varsity, December 2, 1890.Google Scholar

54. In the Loudon Papers there is a number of letters in which Loudon and Koenig exchanged information about experiments, usually in acoustics; moreover, Loudon wrote a biographical sketch of Koenig (University of Toronto Department of Rare Books and Special Collections [hereafter cited as U.T.A.]).Google Scholar

55. Ashley to Ross, March 21, 1889, Series D-7, P.A.O.Google Scholar

56. Ashley to Ross, July 17, 1892, ibid.Google Scholar

57. Baldwin to Ross, November 17, 1890, ibid.; Baldwin, W. J., “The Psychological Laboratory in the University of Toronto,“ Science 19 (1892): 143–44; Hall, G. Stanley, Life and Confessions of a Psychologist (New York, 1924), p. 259.Google Scholar

58. Baldwin to Harcourt, R., Provincial Treasurer, October 4, 1892; Baldwin to Ross, n.d., Series D-7, P.A.O.; Alexander, W. J., ed., University of Toronto and Its Colleges, 1827–1906 (Toronto, 1906), app. B and C.Google Scholar

59. Loudon to Ross, November 8, 1895, Series D-7, P.A.O.Google Scholar

60. Loudon, James, “Post-Graduate Courses,“ Canada Educational Monthly (January 1898), pp. 38–39.Google Scholar

61. Ibid., p. 25.Google Scholar

62. “The Ph.D. Octopus,” Educational Review (February 1918), p. 151 (reprinted from Harvard Monthly [March 1902]).Google Scholar

63. Boska to DeLury, February 24, 1895, DeLury Collection, U.T.A.Google Scholar

64. Squair, John who received the B.A. in 1883 from the University of Toronto, was among the first fellows appointed by the University. A supporter of James Loudon's policies, he was appointed associate professor in 1892, shortly after Loudon became president.Google Scholar

65. “Post-Graduate Courses in the University of Toronto,” Proceedings of the Ontario Educational Association, 1894, p. 67.Google Scholar

66. Alexander, , University of Toronto and Its Colleges, pp. 57–70; McNab, G. G., The Development of Higher Education in Ontario (Toronto, 1925), pp. 83–91.Google Scholar

67. “The University of Toronto,” Canada Educational Monthly (February 1897), p. 68.Google Scholar

68. Vaughan, V. C., “The Necessity of Encouraging Scientific Work,“ Formal Opening of the New Building of the Biological Department, December 19, 1889 (Toronto, 1890), p. 20, U.T.A. (reprinted from the Canadian Practitioner, January 1, January 15, and February 1, 1890).Google Scholar

69. “The University of Toronto,” Canada Educational Monthly (February 1897), p. 68.Google Scholar

70. Masters, D. C., The Rise of Toronto, 1850–1890 (Toronto, 1947); Spelt, J., The Urban Development in South-Central Ontario (Assen, Neth., 1955).Google Scholar

71. Ontario, Legislative Assembly, 50 Victoria, ch. 43. This Act revived the University as a teaching body. (Between 1853 and 1887 University College was responsible for all teaching in the arts at the University of Toronto.) Under the new arrangement the colleges had their curriculum restricted to Greek, Latin, French, German, English, oriental languages, moral philosophy, and ancient history, while the University was authorized to teach all additional subjects, including history, political science, Spanish, Italian, mathematics, and the sciences.Google Scholar

72. Ben-David, Joseph, “Scientific Productivity and Academic Organization in Nineteenth-Century Medicine,“ in Sociology and History, ed. Cahnman, W. J. and Boskoff, A., (New York, 1964), p. 518.Google Scholar

73. Flexner, Abraham, Medical Education in the United States and Canada, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Bulletin no. 4, (Boston, 1910), p. 323.Google Scholar

74. Science, n.s. 3, January 17, 1896, pp. 103–4.Google Scholar

75. Alexander, , University of Toronto and Its Colleges, app. C; Langton, H. H., “University of Toronto Studies,“ Varsity, March 14, 1907.Google Scholar

76. Edward Blake to Ross, July 27, 1892, and August 29, 1892, and Blake to Premier Oliver Mowat, September 2, 1892, Blake Papers, U.T.A.Google Scholar

77. Hume, J. G. to Blake, August 22, 1892; McCurdy, J. F. to Blake, August 29, 1892, ibid.Google Scholar

78. Loudon, James, Address at the Convocation of University College, Toronto, October 11, 1893 (Toronto, 1893), p. 8.Google Scholar

79. University of Toronto Monthly (March 1901), p. 213.Google Scholar

80. Blake, Hon. Edward, Address at the Convocation of the University of Toronto, June 10, 1892 (Toronto, 1892), p. 1; “Attendance at the University of Toronto and Victoria College, 1892–1899,” Loudon Papers, U.T.A.Google Scholar

81. Ross, George W., Address Delivered on Moving the Second Reading of a Bill re. University of Toronto in the Legislative Assembly of Ontario, April 1, 1897, p. 11.Google Scholar

82. New York, 1896.Google Scholar

83. Ibid., p. 184, “The University of Toronto,” Canada Educational Monthly (February 1897), p. 67; Langton, , James Loudon and the University of Toronto, p. 17.Google Scholar

84. Ross, George W., The Policy of the Education Department (Toronto, 1897).Google Scholar

85. Osler had also attended a private school, Trinity College School, for part of his secondary education, although Ross did not mention this.Google Scholar

86. “Annual Convocation at University College,” Canada Educational Monthly (November 1886), p. 342.Google Scholar

87. Wilson, Sir Daniel, Address at the Convocation of University College 1888 (Toronto, 1888), p. 17.Google Scholar

88. Squair, , “Post-Graduate Courses in the University of Toronto,“ p. 67; Squair, John, “Lessons from Lost Opportunities,“ University of Toronto Monthly (October 1904), p. 10.Google Scholar

89. Varsity, October 14, October 23, and November 11, 1897.Google Scholar

90. Wilson, Sir Daniel, Address at the Convocation of University College, 1890 (Toronto, 1890), p. 16.Google Scholar

91. In 1906 a Royal Commission was appointed to investigate the problems that Toronto faced as a provincial university. A number of briefs from the colleges and individuals argued the importance of liberal culture (Ontario, Royal Commission on the University of Toronto, Report [Toronto, 1906]).Google Scholar

92. Alexander was the first Canadian to earn the Ph.D. at Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar

93. University of Toronto, Annual Report of the President of the University of Toronto for the Year Ending June 30th, 1902, p. 6.Google Scholar

94. Minutes of the Senate, March 13, 1896; March 12, 1897; May 14, 1897, U.T.A.Google Scholar

95. Ibid., March 12, 1897.Google Scholar

96. Loudon, , “Post-Graduate Courses,“ p. 38.Google Scholar

97. That the University of Toronto followed the general pattern that was emerging during the 1890s is confirmed by a comparison of the regulations for the Ph.D. at Toronto and at nine leading American universities: California, Chicago, Columbia, Harvard, Johns Hopkins, Michigan, Princeton, Wisconsin, and Yale. All nine were charter members of the Association of American Universities and, since they produced the majority of doctorates in the United States, were influential models.Google Scholar