Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:47:47.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Compromise and Diversity in the American High School

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

Herbert M. Kliebard
Herbert M. Kliebard*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Essay Reviews
Information
History of Education Quarterly , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , Spring 1987 , pp. 89 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the History of Education Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Report of the Subcommittee of the Boston School Committee, 26 Oct. 1820.Google Scholar

2. National Education Association, Report of the Committee on Secondary School Studies (Washington, D.C., 1893).Google Scholar

3. Stanley Hall, G., Adolescence: Its Psychology and Its Relations to Physiology, Anthropology, Sociology, Sex, Crime, Religion, and Education, Vol. 2 (New York, 1904), 510.Google Scholar

4. Eliot, Charles W., “The Fundamental Assumptions in the Report of the Committee of Ten,” Educational Review 30 (Nov. 1905): 325–43.Google Scholar

5. Massachusetts Commission on Industrial and Technical Education, Report of the Commission on Industrial and Technical Education (Boston, 1906); Thorndike, Edward L., “The Opportunity of the High Schools,” The Bookman 24 (Oct. 1906): 180.Google Scholar

6. Cusick, Philip A., The Egalitarian Ideal and the American High School: Studies of Three Schools (New York, 1983).Google Scholar

7. For an excellent account of the process by which school administrators were transformed from educators to managers, see Callahan, Raymond E., Education and the Cult of Efficiency: A Study of the Social Forces That Have Shaped the Administration of Public Schools (Chicago, 1962).Google Scholar

8. See, for example, McNeil, Linda M., “Negotiating Classroom Knowledge: Beyond Achievement and Socialization,” Journal of Curriculum Studies 13 (Oct.-Dec. 1981): 313–28.Google Scholar

9. Dewey, John, “The Situation as Regards the Course of Study,” Journal of Proceedings and Addresses of the Fortieth Annual Meeting of the National Education Association (1901), 337–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10. Educational Policies Commission, Education for All American Youth (Washington, D.C., 1944).Google Scholar

11. Regrettably, the 1952 Dewey quotation that Hampel chose to illustrate the persistence of authoritarianism in education (p. 51) was written by someone else, even though it appeared under Dewey's name. “Deletions from the Dewey Bibliography,” The Dewey Newsletter 9 (Oct. 1975).Google Scholar

12. Conant, James B., The American High School Today: A First Report to Interested Citizens (New York, 1959).Google Scholar