Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:33:09.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Archive and Chieftainship Claims in Zimbabwe: Some Methodological Reflections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2019

George Bishi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This article focuses on the uses of the archive in contemporary Zimbabwe by individuals and families making claims to chieftaincy. A reading of the colonial archive on chieftainship histories reveals that there is an information gap especially for some years. For instance, from the 1960s to the present, there are relatively few documents specifically relating to the subject of chiefs and headmen in Zimbabwe. As a result, researchers working on chieftainships, hired historians, and claimants to chieftaincy face a frustrating challenge of limited sources. This article analyzes the sources that hired historians use to write chieftaincy claims reports in Zimbabwe for their clients. It also explores the use of oral evidence to complement or counter the narratives offered through colonial documents, and it also recommends the use of alternative sources on chieftaincy, both within and beyond the repositories of the National Archives of Zimbabwe (NAZ).

Résumé:

Cet article porte sur l’utilisation des archives du Zimbabwe contemporain par des individus et des familles faisant valoir leurs droits à un titre de chef. Une lecture des archives coloniales sur l’histoire des chefferies révèle qu’il existe un manque de documentation, en particulier sur des années spécifiques. Par exemple, depuis les années 1960, il existe relativement peu de documents spécifiquement consacrés à la question des chefs de différentes catégories au Zimbabwe. En conséquence, les chercheurs (professionels ou engagés pour l’occasion) ou ceux qui prétendent à un titre de chef font face à un défi frustrant lié à celui de la limitation des sources. Cet article analyse les sources utilisées par les historiens recrutés par les prétendants au titre de chef pour rédiger des rapports de réclamations. Il explore également l’utilisation de preuves orales pour complémenter ou contrer les récits proposés dans les documents coloniaux. Enfin, l’article traite des sources alternatives localisées dans les Archives Nationales du Zimbabwe ou en dehors.

Type
Archival Reports
Information
History in Africa , Volume 46 , June 2019 , pp. 385 - 401
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, Jocelyn, The Unsettled Land: State-Making and the Politics of Land in Zimbabwe 1893–2003 (Oxford: James Currey, 2006).Google Scholar
Beach, David N., The Shona & Zimbabwe 900–1850: An outline of Shona History (London: Heinemann, 1980).Google Scholar
Beach, David N., “NADA and Mafohla: Antiquarianism in Rhodesia and Zimbabwe with Special Reference to the Work of F.W.T. Posselt,” History in Africa 13 (1986), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beach, David N., War and Politics in Zimbabwe 1840-1900 (Gweru: Mambo Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Beach, David N., A Zimbabwean Past: Shona Dynastic Histories and Oral Traditions (Gweru: Mambo Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Chipashu, Esther, and Bishi, George, “A Survey of Seke Chieftainship Genealogy” (unpublished report, 2013).Google Scholar
Chipashu, Esther, and George, Bishi, “A Historical Analysis of the Mutsago Chieftainship: A Reconstruction” (unpublished report, 2013).Google Scholar
Chipashu, Esther, and Magadzike, Blessed, “A Historical Investigation of the Lost Sanyanga Chieftainship of Nyanga District, Eastern Zimbabwe” (unpublished report, 2011).Google Scholar
Cook, Terry, and Schwartz, Joan M., “‘Records of Simple Truth and Precision:’ Photography, Archives, and the Illusion of Control,” Archivaria 50 (2000), 1–40.Google Scholar
Cripps, Lionel, “The Umtasa Treaty: A Study in the Empire Building and Other Things,” Native Annual Department Affairs 11 (1933), 91–95.Google Scholar
Jeater, Diana, “Speaking like a Native: Vernacular Languages and the State in Southern Rhodesia, 1890–1935,” Journal of African History 42–3 (2001), 449–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiwenyika, Jason, “A History and Customs of the Manyika People,” Native Affairs Department Annual 11 (1976), 300–305.Google Scholar
Manungo, Kenneth D., “Oral History as Captured by The National Archives of Zimbabwe over the Years,” National Archives 75@30: 75 Years of Archiving Excellence at the National Archives of Zimbabwe (Harare: National Archives of Zimbabwe, 2012), 64–67.Google Scholar
Manungo, Kenneth, and Peet, Stephen, “‘We Have a Tradition of Story-Telling:’ Oral History in Zimbabwe,” Oral History 16–2 (1988), 67–72.Google Scholar
Mazarire, Gerald C., “Reading Chishanga: Some Issues of Process and Method,” in: Ngulube, P. (ed.), National Archives 75@ 30: 75 Years of Archiving Excellence at the National Archives of Zimbabwe (Harare: National Archives of Zimbabwe, 2012), 42–63.Google Scholar
Mudenge, Isaak S.G., A Political History of Munhumutapa c. 1400–1902 (Harare: Zimbabwe Publishing House, 1988).Google Scholar
Ranger, Terence O., “The Mobilization of Labour and the Production of Knowledge: The Antiquarian Tradition in Rhodesia,” Journal of African History 20–4 (1979), 507–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranger, Terence O., “Tradition and Travesty: Chiefs and the Administration in Makoni District, Zimbabwe, 1960–1980,” Journal of the International African Institute 52–3 (1982), 20–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savanhu, Joseph, “The Waharava History,” Native Affairs Department Annual 3 (1925), 59–62.Google Scholar
Worby, Eric, “Maps, Names, and Ethnic Games: The Epistemology and Iconography of Colonial Power in North-Western Zimbabwe,” Journal of Southern African Studies 20–3 (1994), 371–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar