Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:09:06.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fieldwork Ain't Always Fun: Public and Hidden Discourses on Fieldwork1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2014

Baz Lecocq
Baz Lecocq*
Affiliation:
Amsterdam School for Social Science Research, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Before I start, I would like to stress that the following is in no way meant as a complaint. Neither would I like you to think that I am disgusted by fieldwork in general, and fieldwork in Mali in particular. The point that I want to get across is that the personal emotional experience and state of mind during fieldwork have an impact on the way fieldworkers, in being their own instruments, practice their research. We would like to believe that this emotional state is one of euphoria, but in reality it includes negative experiences and feelings. These feelings should be accounted for—not just personally, but also professionally.

There exists a dichotomy between open and hidden discourse about experiences in the field among social scientists practising fieldwork. This dichotomy is as old as fieldwork itself and gained some acknowledgment of existence after the publication of Malinowski's Diary in the Strict Sense of the Term (Malinowski 1967). This dichotomy consists of a representation of fieldwork experiences towards colleagues and the larger audience as ideal, unproblematic, and among the best experiences a person can have in life. It is almost like a holiday. It is only in an informal setting, usually the pub, that some dare to speak of the danger, nuisance, despair, and general inconvenience of it all. Even talking about severe illness or other dangers is often done with the self assured attitude of someone capable of facing Armageddon and getting out alive. Apparently, Indiana Jones does exist.

Type
Research Article
Information
History in Africa , Volume 29 , 2002 , pp. 273 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This paper was orginially presented at the seminar “Fieldwork Ain't Always Fun: Methodological, Practical, and Personal Problems in Extreme Fieldwork Settings,” Amsterdam School for Social Science Research, 7 December 2000.

References

Barley, N., The Innocent Anthropologist: Notes From a Mud Hut (London, 1983).Google Scholar
Daniel, E., Charred Lullabies (Princeton, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, C., Works and Lives, the Anthropologist as Author (Stanford, 1988).Google Scholar
Gluck, S. and Patai, D., eds., Women's Words: The Feminist Practice of Oral History (London, 1991).Google Scholar
Malinowski, B., A Diary in the Strict Sense of the Term (London, 1967).Google Scholar
Narayan, K., “Participant Observation” in Behar, R. and Gordon, D., eds., Women Writing Culture (Berkeley, 1995), 33–48.Google Scholar
Nordstrom, C. and Robben, A., eds., Fieldwork Under Fire (Berkeley, 1995).Google Scholar
Piot, C., Remotely Global: Village Modernity in West Africa (Chicago, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shryock, A., Nationalism and the Genealogical Imagination: Oral History and Textual Authority in Tribal Jordan (Berkeley, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, D., ed., Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork (Boulder, 1996).Google Scholar