Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:02:11.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SUEZ AND BRITAIN'S DECLINE AS A WORLD POWER*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2012

G. C. PEDEN
G. C. PEDEN*
Affiliation:
University of Stirling
*
Ardvurich, Leny Feus, Callander FK17 8AS[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Suez crisis is widely believed to have contributed significantly to Britain's decline as a world power. Eden's miscalculation of American reaction to the attack on Egypt was damaging to Britain's reputation and fatal to his career. However, his actions were contrary to received wisdom in Whitehall. The crisis merely confirmed Britain's dependence on the United States and had no lasting impact on Anglo-American relations. Britain's relationship with its informal and formal empire was already changing before 1956, and the turn from the commonwealth to Europe owed little to Suez. Examination of policy reviews in Whitehall before and after the Suez crisis shows that the Foreign Office, Commonwealth Relations Office, and Colonial Office were slow to accept the need for change in Britain's world role. Insofar as they did from 1959 it was because of Treasury arguments about the effect of high defence expenditure on the economy, and slow growth of the United Kingdom's population compared with the United States, the European Economic Community, and the Soviet Union.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 55 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 1073 - 1096
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I am grateful to the British Academy for funding the research and to Gill Bennett for commenting on an earlier draft of the article.

References

1 Accounts of the crisis that take this view include Kyle, K., Suez (London, 1991, 2003)Google Scholar; Louis, W. R. and Owen, R, eds., Suez 1956: the crisis and its consequences (Oxford, 1989)Google Scholar; Lucas, W. S., Divided we stand: Britain, the US and the Suez crisis (London, 1991)Google Scholar.

2 Reynolds, D., Britannia overruled: British policy and world power in the 20th century (London, 1991), p. 205Google Scholar.

3 Parsons, M., ed., Looking back: the Wilson years, 1964–1970 (Pau, 1999), pp. 63–4Google Scholar.

4 Frankel, J., British foreign policy, 1945–1973 (London, 1975), p. 162Google Scholar.

5 Heath, E., The course of my life (London, 1988), pp. 177–8Google Scholar.

6 Lloyd, S., Suez 1956: a personal account (London, 1978), p. 252Google Scholar.

7 A. J. Stockwell, ‘Suez 1956 and the moral disarmament of the British empire’, in S. C. Smith, ed., Reassessing Suez 1956: new perspectives on the crisis and its aftermath (Aldershot, 2008), pp. 227–38.

8 Eden's ‘thoughts’ on general position after Suez, 28 Dec. 1956, Prime Minister's Office papers, series 11, file 1138 (PREM 11/1138), The National Archives of the United Kingdom (TNA).

9 Hennessy, P., Muddling through: power, politics and the quality of government in postwar Britain (London, 1990), pp. 97–8Google Scholar.

10 Geiger, T., Britain and the economic problem of the cold war: the political economy and economic impact of the British defence effort, 1945–1955 (Aldershot, 2004)Google Scholar; Peden, G. C., Arms, economics and British strategy: from dreadnoughts to hydrogen bombs (Cambridge, 2007), pp. 250–60, 269–70, 318–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Lloyd to Eden, 13 July 1955, PREM 11/1778.

12 ‘Defence policy’, PR (56) 2, joint memorandum by Macmillan and Monckton, 20 Mar. 1956, British documents on the end of empire (BDEE), series A, vol. iii: The Conservative government and the end of empire, 1951–1957, ed. D. Goldsworthy, part 1: International relations (London, 1994), p. 60; Macmillan diaries: the cabinet years, 1950–1957, ed. P. Catterall (London, 2003), 29 Jan. 1956.

13 JIC (56) 21 (Final), 1 May 1956, reproduced as appendix to PR (56) 3, Cabinet Office papers, series 134, vol. 1315 (CAB 134/1315), TNA; ‘Soviet economic offensive’, ES (56) 11 Revise, 12 Apr. 1956, CAB 134/1236; ‘Cabinet: aircraft programme’, note of meeting of ministers, 31 May 1956, Gen 514/ 2nd meeting, PREM 11/1712.

14 Brook to Eden, 1 May 1956, PREM 11/1778.

15 PR (56) 3, 1 June 1956, BDE E, series A, vol. iii, part 1, pp. 61–81.

16 Brook to Eden, 2 June 1956, PREM 11/1778.

17 Notes by Patrick Dean, 23 and 30 Apr. 1956, Foreign Office papers, series 371, file 123191 (FO 371/123191), TNA.

18 ‘The UK part in the primary deterrent’, circulated by Major-General W. G. Stirling, 30 Apr. 1956, FO 371/123187.

19 PR (56) 3, paras. 1, 7–12, 17, and PR (56) 11, BDE E, series A, vol. iii, part 1, pp. 62–5, 91.

20 PR (56) 3, para. 30, and PR (56) 11, para. 1, ibid., pp. 67, 91.

21 PR (56) 3, para. 51(f), ibid., p. 71.

22 Ashton, N., Eisenhower, Macmillan and the problem of Nasser: Anglo-American relations and Arab nationalism, 1955–1959 (Basingstoke, 1996), pp. 45–51, 54–60, 65–7, 79CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Petersen, T., ‘Anglo-American rivalry in the Middle East: the struggle for the Buraimi oasis, 1952–1957’, International History Review, 14 (1992), pp. 71–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 A. Adamthwaite, ‘Suez revisited’, in M. Dockrill and J. Young, eds., British foreign policy, 1945–1956 (Basingstoke, 1989), pp. 225–45, at pp. 234–8.

24 A. Lane, ‘The past as matrix: Sir Ivonne Kirkpatrick, permanent under-secretary for foreign affairs’, in S. Kelly and A. Gorst, eds., Whitehall and the Suez crisis (London, 2000), pp. 199–220.

25 Clark, W., From three worlds: memoirs (London, 1986), p. 210Google Scholar.

26 Schuckburgh, E., Descent to Suez: diaries, 1951–1956 (London, 1986), pp. 362–3Google Scholar.

27 Ziegler, P., Mountbatten (London, 1985), pp. 538–46Google Scholar.

28 Hennessy, P., Whitehall (London, 1989), pp. 144–5Google Scholar.

29 Bridges to Macmillan, 7 Sept. 1956, Treasury papers, series 236, file 4188 (T 236/4188), TNA.

30 R. Makins, ‘Sidelight on Suez’, c. 1986, and telegram 1849 for foreign secretary, 9 Sept. 1956, MS Sherfield 957, Bodleian Library, Oxford.

31 Fforde, J., The Bank of England and public policy, 1941–1958 (Cambridge, 1992), p. 549Google Scholar; L. Johnman, ‘Defending the pound: the economics of the Suez crisis’, in T. Gorst, L. Johnman, and W. S. Lucas, eds., Postwar Britain, 1945–1964 (London, 1989), pp. 166–81; Kunz, D., The economic diplomacy of the Suez crisis (Chapel Hill, NC, 1991)Google Scholar; Peden, G. C., The Treasury and British public policy, 1906–1959 (Oxford, 2000), pp. 446–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Kyle, Suez, pp. 327–8; Craddock, P., Know your enemy: how the Joint Intelligence Committee saw the world (London, 2002), pp. 109, 116, 123–6Google Scholar.

33 JIC (56) 98 (Final), 4 Oct., and note by secretary, 30 Oct. 1956, CAB 158/25.

34 Lloyd, Suez, p. 253. Macmillan likewise confessed to having miscalculated the extent to which the Americans would resent being kept in the dark about the Anglo-French action – Macmillan, H., Riding the storm (London, 1971), p. 157Google Scholar.

35 Lucas, Divided we stand, p. 330.

36 ‘The effect of our external financial position on our foreign policy’, circulated by Eden on 30 Mar. 1945 and by Bevin on 11 Mar. 1946, and memorandum with same title circulated by Bevin on 12 Feb. 1947, FO 371/62420.

37 Cabinet conclusions, CC (52) 4, 17 Jan. 1952, CAB 128/24.

38 Charmley, J., Churchill's grand alliance: the Anglo-American special relationship, 1940–1957 (London, 1995), pp. 244–61, 274–86, 294–5, 297Google Scholar; Ruane, K. and Ellison, J., ‘Managing the Americans: Anthony Eden, Harold Macmillan and the pursuit of “power by proxy”’, Contemporary British History, 18 (2004), pp. 147–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39 Caccia to Lloyd, ‘The present state of Anglo-United States relations’, 28 Dec. 1956, PREM 11/2189.

40 Telegrams no. 1 and 3, FO 371/126682.

41 Ashton, N., Kennedy, Macmillan and the cold war: the irony of interdependence (Basingstoke, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; M. Dockrill, ‘Restoring the “special relationship”: the Bermuda and Washington conferences 1957’, in D. Richardson and G. Stone, eds., Decisions and diplomacy: essays in twentieth-century international history (London, 1995), pp. 205–23; Geelhoed, E. B. and Edmonds, A. O., Eisenhower, Macmillan and allied unity, 1957–1961 (Basingstoke, 2003)Google Scholar.

42 L. Freedman and J. Gearson, ‘Interdependence and independence: Nassau and the British nuclear deterrent’, in K. Burk and M. Stokes, eds., The United States and the European alliance since 1945 (Oxford, 1999), pp. 179–203; Aldrich, R. J., ‘British intelligence and the Anglo-American “special relationship” during the cold war’, Review of International Studies, 24 (1988), pp. 331–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

43 Bartlett, C. J., ‘The special relationship’: a political history of Anglo-American relations since 1945 (London, 1992), p. 77Google Scholar.

44 Freedman, L., The official history of the Falklands campaign, ii: War and diplomacy (London, 2005), p. 84Google Scholar.

45 Louis, W. R., The British empire in the Middle East (Oxford, 1984), pp. 383–96, 414–77, 514–36Google Scholar.

46 Memorandum by Roger Makins (deputy under-secretary), 11 Aug. 1951, with comment by Sir William Strang (permanent under-secretary), FO 371/124968, cited in Beck, P., ‘The lessons of Abadan and Suez for British foreign policymakers in the 1960s’, Historical Journal, 49 (2006), pp. 525–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47 ‘Egypt: the alternatives’, C (53) 65, 16 Feb. 1953, CAB 129/59.

48 Lucas, Divided we stand, pp. 106–34, 140, 146–7, 151–5, 219, 276–8.

49 H. Beeley, ‘The Middle East’, in W. R. Louis and H. Bull, eds., The special relationship: Anglo-American relations since 1945 (Oxford, 1986), pp. 285–93.

50 R. Khalidi, ‘Consequences of the Suez crisis in the Arab world’, in Louis and Owen, eds., Suez, pp. 377–92, at pp. 381, 383; Franzén, J., ‘Development vs. reform: attempts at modernisation during the twilight of British influence in Iraq, 1946–1958’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 37 (2009), pp. 77–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 Heinlein, F., British government policy and decolonisation, 1945–1963: scrutinising the official mind (London, 2002), pp. 163–6Google Scholar.

52 Galpern, S. G., Money, oil and empire in the Middle East: sterling and postwar imperialism, 1944–1971 (Cambridge, 2009), pp. 196–7, 202–3Google Scholar.

53 Mawby, S., ‘Britain's last imperial frontier: the Aden protectorates, 1952–1959’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 29 (2001), pp. 75–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Smith, S. C., Britain's revival and fall in the Gulf: Kuwait, Bahrein, Qatar and the Trucial States, 1950–1971 (London, 2004)Google Scholar.

54 Morgan, D. J., Official history of colonial development, v: Guidance towards self-government in British colonies, 1941–1971 (London and Basingstoke, 1980), pp. 88–91Google Scholar. For changing economic relationships, see Krozewski, G., Money and the end of empire: British international economic policy and the colonies, 1947–1958 (Basingstoke, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Krozewski believes Suez was important as it ‘revealed how fragile Britain's economy was in the global context without the support of the United States’ (p. 149), but, as noted above (pp. 1101–03), the Treasury was aware of sterling's weakness even before the crisis unfolded.

55 A. Hopkins, ‘Macmillan's audit of empire, 1957’, in P. Clarke and C. Trebilcock, eds., Understanding decline: perceptions and realities of British economic performance (Cambridge, 1997), pp. 234–60.

56 W. R. Louis, ‘Public enemy number one: the British empire in the dock of the United Nations, 1957–1971’, in M. Lynn, ed., The British empire in the 1950s: retreat or revival? (Basingstoke, 2006), pp. 186–213.

57 Heinlein, British government policy, pp. 184–7; Darwin, J., ‘The central African emergency, 1959’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 21 (1993), pp. 217–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ovendale, R., ‘Macmillan and the wind of change in Africa, 1957–1960’, Historical Journal, 38 (1995), pp. 455–77Google Scholar.

58 CC (54) 83, 7 Dec. 1954, CAB 128/27.

59 Devereux, D. R., The formulation of British defence policy towards the Middle East, 1948–1956 (Basingstoke, 1990), pp. 92–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60 Mansergh, N., The commonwealth experience, ii: From British to multiracial commonwealth (London, 1982), p. 171CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

61 S. Gopal, ‘India, the crisis, and the non-aligned nations’; M. G. Fry, ‘Canada, the North Atlantic triangle, and the United Nations’, and J. D. B. Miller, ‘Australia and the crisis’, in Louis and Owen, eds., Suez, pp. 173–87, 285–316, and 275–83.

62 Milward, A. S., The rise and fall of a national strategy, 1945–1963 (London, 2002), p. 262Google Scholar.

63 Plan G is reproduced in Macmillan, Riding the storm, pp. 753–4.

64 Macmillan, H., At the end of the day (London, 1973), pp. 110, 116–38, 349, 524–39Google Scholar; Gowland, D., Turner, A., and Wright, A., Britain and European integration since 1945: on the sidelines (London, 2010), pp. 56–67Google Scholar.

65 ‘The grand design: co-operation with Western Europe’, CP (57) 6, 5 Jan. 1957, CAB 129/84, and CM (57) 3, 9 Jan. 1957, CAB 128/30.

66 Doise, Jean and Vaisse, Maurice, Diplomatie et outil militaire, 1871–1969: politique étrangère de la France (Paris, 1987), p. 431Google Scholar; Jones, M., ‘Anglo-American relations after Suez: the rise and decline of the working groups experiment and the French challenge to NATO, 1957–1959’, Diplomacy and Statecraft, 14 (2003), pp. 49–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pagedas, C. A., Anglo-American strategic relations and the French problem, 1960–1963 (London, 2000)Google Scholar.

67 Eden, A., Memoirs: full circle (London, 1960), pp. 371–3Google Scholar.

68 GEN 564, meetings of 18 and 19 Dec. 1956, CAB 130/122; PR (56) 45 and 50, CAB 134/1315.

69 Defence: outline of future policy (Cmnd 124), Parliamentary Papers (PP) 1956–7, xxiii, p. 489.

70 Hoyer Millar to Brook, 9 Oct., and Brook to prime minister, 25 Oct. 1957, CAB 21/4717.

71 ‘The position of the United Kingdom in world affairs’, and covering note by Brook, 5 June 1958, PREM 11/2321. The report is reproduced in BDEE, series A, vol. iv: The Conservative government and the end of empire, 1957–1964, ed. R. Hyam and W. R. Louis, part 1: High policy, political and constitutional change (London, 2000), pp. 43–51.

72 Heinlein, British government policy, p. 166, goes so far as to describe the committee as split into factions, but his account is marred by errors about its composition. He wrongly supposes Board of Trade officials to have participated in its discussions, and omits the Ministry of Defence's contribution.

73 Minute by P. E. Ramsbotham (Planning Section, FO), 24 Jan. 1958, FO 371/135623.

74 ‘Future UK policy in use of resources’, 30 Jan. 1958, FO 371/135624.

75 GEN 624/2nd meeting, 4 Feb. 1958, CAB 130/139; ‘Future policy’, 28 Feb. 1958, FO 371/135625.

76 Summaries of memoranda by CRO (GEN 624/2, CAB 130/139) and Colonial Office (GEN 624/4, retained by Department), n.d. but Feb. 1958, FO 371/135624.

77 GEN 659/1st meeting, 7 July 1958, CAB 130/153.

78 Memoranda by William Armstrong, 17 May, and Richard Clarke, 6 August, and note by Makins, 4 July (all 1958), T 234/754.

79 ‘The effects of nuclear sufficiency’, COS (58) 39, 13 Feb. 1958, Ministry of Defence papers, series 5, volume 82 (DEFE 5/82), TNA; confidential annex to COS (58) 77th meeting, 3 Sept. 1958, DEFE 4/111.

80 Brook, ‘The position of the United Kingdom in world affairs’, 4 Nov. 1958, PREM 11/2275.

81 ‘Future policy’, 20 Feb. 1959, PREM 11/2945.

82 Ball, S. J., The bomber in British strategy: doctrine, strategy and Britain's world role, 1945–1960 (Boulder, CO, 1995), pp. 163–74Google Scholar.

83 Macmillan diary, 7 June 1959, MS Macmillan dep. d.35, Bodleian Library, Oxford.

84 ‘Future policy study 1960–1970’, C (60) 35, 29 Feb. 1960, CAB 129/100; FP (60) 1st meeting, 23 Mar. 1960, CAB 134/1929; note of meeting in Sir Frank Lee's room, 5 Apr. 1960, T 325/65.

85 C (60) 35, part ii, paras. 5–6, CAB 129/100; extracts from CRO draft memorandum, ‘The commonwealth, 1960–1970’, 30 July 1959, BDEE, series A, vol. iv, part i, pp. 61–9.

86 Schenk, C., The decline of sterling: managing the retreat of an international currency 1945–1992 (Cambridge, 2010), pp. 32, 111, 117, 207–8, 414–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

87 Committee on the working of the monetary system: report (Cmnd 827), PP 1958–9, xvii, p. 389, paras. 657–60, 678.

88 C (60) 35, part i, paras. 1–6, CAB 129/100; ‘Future policy 1960–70 (Q. A8)’, by Clarke, 26 June 1959, FO 371/143702; P. E. Ramsbotham, ‘Economic strength (questions 1–3) FP(B) (59) 11’, 21 July 1959, FO 371/143704.

89 C (60) 35, part iii, paras. 6, 8–9, 13, 30, CAB 129/100.

90 C (60) 35, CAB 129/100, part i, paras. 12–13, and part iii, paras. 14–16 and 30; comments by P. Dean and others, 4–10 Aug. 1959, on CRO draft memorandum, ‘The commonwealth, 1960–1970’ (see n. 85), FO 371/143705.

91 C (60) 35, part iii, paras. 8, 38, 49–52, 64, 85, CAB 129/100; R. Clarke, ‘Cost of UK defence’, 21 Dec. 1959, and Clarke to Makins, 22 Dec. 1959, T 234/757.

92 C (60) 35, part ii, paras. 13–17, part iv, 30. For public expenditure see Middleton, R., Government versus the market: the growth of the public sector, economic management and British economic performance, c. 1890–1979 (Cheltenham, 1996), p. 499Google Scholar.

93 D. K. Burdett, ‘Defence and the corpus’, 6 Nov. 1959, T 234/756.

94 Peden, , Arms, economics and British strategy, pp. 332–42Google Scholar; Dockrill, S., Britain's retreat from east of Suez: the choice between Europe and the world (Basingstoke, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

95 A. Shonfield's seminal British economic policy since the war (Harmondsworth, 1958) came independently to similar conclusions to those of the Treasury on the need to reduce defence commitments, but was critical of its management of the economy and advocated economic planning.

96 O'Hara, G., From dreams to disillusionment: economic and social planning in 1960s Britain (Basingstoke, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pemberton, H., ‘Relative decline and British economic policy in the 1960s’, Historical Journal, 47 (2004), pp. 989–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tomlinson, J., ‘Balanced accounts? Constructing the balance of payments problem in post-war Britain’, English Historical Review, 124 (2009), pp. 863–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

97 A. Maddison, ‘Macroeconomic accounts for European countries’, in B. van Ark and N. Crafts, eds., Quantitative aspects of post-war European economic growth (Cambridge, 1996), pp. 27–83, at pp. 44, 63–4.

98 A. France to Sir D. Rickett, 22 July 1959, T 234/277. See also P. Vinter, ‘Relationships with the US, Europe and the commonwealth’, 24 July 1959, T 234/755. For Churchill's ‘three circles’, see The Times, 11 Oct. 1948. Approximate populations in 1970 were: UK 55.6 million; USA 203 million; EEC 188 million; Soviet Union 242 million.