Article contents
‘ROTTEN PROTESTANTS’: PROTESTANT HOME RULERS AND THE ULSTER LIBERAL ASSOCIATION, 1906–1918
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 July 2017
Abstract
This article assesses ‘Rotten Protestants’, or Protestant home rulers in Ulster, by means of an analysis of the Ulster Liberal Association, from its founding in 1906 until its virtual disappearance by 1918. It argues that Ulster Liberalism has been neglected or dismissed in Irish historiography, and that this predominantly Protestant, pro-home rule organization, with its origins in nineteenth-century radicalism, complicates our understanding of the era. It has previously been argued that this tradition did not really exist: this article uses prosopography to demonstrate the existence of a significant group of Protestant Liberal activists in Ulster, as well as to uncover their social, denominational, and geographic profile. Ulster Liberals endured attacks and boycotting; this article highlights the impact of this inter-communal violence on this group. Although Ulster Liberalism had a substantial grassroots organization, it went into sharp decline after 1912. This article describes how the third home rule crisis, the outbreak of the Great War, and the Easter Rising of 1916 prompted a hardening of attitudes which proved detrimental to the survival of a politically dissenting tradition within Ulster Protestantism.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017
References
1 For accounts of this incident, see Ulster Guardian (UG), 17 Feb. 1912; Irish Independent (II), 13 Feb. 1912; Ulster Herald, 17 Feb. 1912; Sydney Morning Herald, 13 Feb. 1912.
2 Bew, Paul, Gibbon, Peter, and Patterson, Henry, Northern Ireland, 1921–2001: political forces and social classes (London, 2002 (1st edn, 1995))Google Scholar.
3 Walker, Graham, ‘The Northern Ireland Labour Party in the 1920s’, Saothar, 10 (1984), pp. 19–30Google Scholar; Norton, Christopher, ‘Creating jobs, manufacturing unity: Ulster Unionism and mass unemployment, 1922–1934’, Contemporary British History, 15 (2001), pp. 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Reid, Colin, ‘Protestant challenges to the “Protestant state”: Ulster Unionism and independent Unionism in Northern Ireland, 1921–1939’, Twentieth Century British History, 19 (2008), pp. 419–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 Hall, Gerald R., Ulster Liberalism, 1778–1876: the middle path (Dublin, 2009)Google Scholar.
6 Thompson, Frank, The end of Liberal Ulster: land agitation and land reform, 1868–1886 (Belfast, 2001)Google Scholar; Wright, Frank, Two lands on one soil: Ulster politics before home rule (Dublin, 1996)Google Scholar; Hall, Ulster Liberalism; Walker, Brian M., Ulster politics: the formative years, 1868–1886 (Belfast, 1989)Google Scholar.
7 Jackson, Alvin, The Ulster Party: Irish Unionists in the House of Commons, 1884–1911 (Oxford, 1989), p. 40Google Scholar.
8 These developments are dealt with, directly or indirectly, in several noteworthy works, including Walker, Graham, A history of the Ulster Unionist Party: protest, pragmatism and pessimism (Manchester and New York, NY, 2004)Google Scholar; Harbinson, John, The Ulster Unionist Party, 1882–1973: its development and organisation (Belfast, 1973)Google Scholar; Burnett, David, ‘The modernisation of Unionism, 1892–1914?’, in English, Richard and Walker, Graham, eds., Unionism in modern Ireland: new perspectives on politics and culture (New York, NY, 1996), pp. 41–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jackson, Alvin, ‘Irish Unionism, 1870–1922’, in Boyce, D. George and O'Day, Alan, eds., in Defenders of the Union: a survey of British and Irish Unionism since 1801 (London and New York, NY, 2001), pp. 115–36Google Scholar; Buckland, Patrick, Ulster Unionism and the origins of Northern Ireland, 1886–1922 (Dublin, 1973)Google Scholar.
9 The literature on Ulster Unionism and the home rule crisis is vast; see Parkinson, Alan F., Friends in high places: Ulster's resistance to Irish home rule, 1912–1914 (Belfast, 2012)Google Scholar, for a fine recent survey. The related field of Irish constitutional crisis and British high politics is of similar size: for a recent penetrating study, see Fanning, Ronan, Fatal path: British government and Irish revolution, 1910–1922 (London, 2013)Google Scholar.
10 See, for example, McMinn, J. R. B., ‘Liberalism in North Antrim, 1900–1914’, Irish Historical Studies, 23, 89 (1982), pp. 17–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar; McMinn, Richard, ‘The myth of “Route” Liberalism in County Antrim, 1869–1900’, Éire-Ireland, 17 (1982), pp. 137–49Google Scholar; McMinn, Richard, ‘Presbyterianism and politics in Ulster, 1871–1906’, Studia Hibernica, 21 (1981), pp. 127–46Google Scholar; McMinn, Richard, ‘The Ballymoney meeting of 1913 – a nationalist mirage?’, The Glynns, 12 (1984), pp. 34–9Google Scholar; McMinn, J. R. B., Against the tide: a calendar of the papers of Rev. J. B. Armour, Irish Presbyterian minister and home ruler, 1869–1914 (Belfast, 1985)Google Scholar; Richard McMinn, review of The dissenting voice: Protestant democracy in Ulster from plantation to partition by Campbell, Flann, Irish Historical Studies, 28 (1993), pp. 323–5Google Scholar. Cf. a later, co-written article, McMinn, Richard, Phoenix, Éamon, and Beggs, Joanne, ‘Jeremiah Jordan M.P. (1830–1911): Protestant home ruler or “Protestant renegade”?’, Irish Historical Studies, 36, 143 (2009), pp. 349–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
11 McMinn, ‘Liberalism in North Antrim’, pp. 28, 18. See also McMinn, ‘The Ballymoney meeting of 1913 – a nationalist mirage?’. For this meeting, see below.
12 McMinn, ‘Liberalism in North Antrim’, p. 18.
13 R. G. Glendinning: McMinn, ‘Liberalism in North Antrim’, pp. 24, 27.
14 Ulster Liberal Unionist Association, The Ulster Liberal Unionist Association: a sketch of its history, 1885–1914 (Belfast, 1913)Google Scholar; Parry, Jonathan, The rise and fall of Liberal government in Victorian Britain (New Haven, CT, 1993), p. 299Google Scholar.
15 See, for example, Ulster Liberal Unionist Association, The Ulster Liberal Unionist Association, pp. 10, 16, 17–18, 23, 40–1, 112; North and South, 7 May, 4 June 1887; UG, 16 Jan. 1909.
16 For evidence of north/south animus, chiefly due to the Ulstermen's desire to control the movement, see National Library of Ireland (NLI), MS 3657, minute book of Dublin branch of the Irish Protestant Home Rule Association (IPHRA), entries for 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 14 June 1886.
17 Loughlin, James, ‘The Irish Protestant Home Rule Association and nationalist politics, 1886–1893’, Irish Historical Studies, 14, 95 (1985), pp. 341–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at pp. 343–4.
18 Foster, R. F., W. B. Yeats: a life, i: The apprentice mage, 1865–1914 (Oxford and New York, NY, 1997), pp. 39–41Google Scholar.
19 North and South, 5, 26 Mar., 25 June 1887; Gwynn, Stephen, Experiences of a literary man (London, 1926), p. 57Google Scholar.
20 Loughlin, ‘The Irish Protestant Home Rule Association’, pp. 343–4; Oliver McCann, ‘The Protestant home rule movement, 1886–1895’ (MA thesis, University College Dublin, 1972), pp. 20–37.
21 The IPHRA took 9,283 votes, to the Unionists’ 26,446, amounting to 35 per cent of the poll.
22 McCann, ‘The Protestant home rule movement’, pp. 99–110.
23 McMinn, Against the tide, pp. xxxi–xxxv.
24 Armour, W. S., Armour of Ballymoney (London, 1934), p. 104Google Scholar. See also McMinn, Against the tide, pp. xxxix–xlii; Minutes of the general assembly of the Presbyterian church in Ireland, 8 (Belfast, 1893), pp. 603–4Google Scholar.
25 McMinn, Against the tide, pp. xliii–xliv; Armour, Armour of Ballymoney, p. 121. For the attempts to attain signatures, frequently impeded by pressure from Presbyterian peers, see [T.?] Irwin to Armour, 6 June 1893; Rev. Richard Lyttle to Armour, 9 June 1893; John Orr to Armour, 10 June 1893; William Craig to Armour, 19 June 1893; William C. McCullough to Armour, 21 June 1893; John Maxwell to Armour, 28 June 1893; J. Scott to Armour, 21 July 1893, in McMinn, Against the tide, pp. 16–22.
26 For an account of this group, see Jackson, Alvin, ‘Irish Unionism and the Russellite threat, 1894–1906’, Irish Historical Studies, 25, 100 (1987), pp. 376–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
27 Pall Mall Gazette ‘Extra’: The Popular Handbook to the New House of Commons, 1906, p. 140.
28 McMinn, ‘Liberalism in North Antrim’, p. 17.
29 Jackson, ‘Irish Unionism and the Russellite threat’, p. 399.
30 UG, 28 Apr. 1906. Four former Russellite candidates went on to stand in the ULA interest: T. W. Russell; R. G. Glendinning; Samuel Robert Keightly; and James Woods.
31 Irish Times (IT), 21 Apr. 1906.
32 See, for example, IT, 12 Nov. 1912, 16 May 1916.
33 IT, 23 Oct. 1906.
34 Nominal data for ULA activists derived from UG, 9, 16, 23 Jan. 1909, 29 Jan., 2 Apr., 10 Dec. 1910, 23 Sept. 1911, 6 Jan., 3, 10, 17 Feb., 6, 27 Apr. 1912, 4 Apr. 1914. Prosopographical data from this and other sets derived in most part from the Census of Ireland, 1901, and Census of Ireland, 1911(available online). Reference was made to a wide variety of other sources, including McGuire, James and Quinn, James, eds., Dictionary of Irish biography (Cambridge, 2009)Google Scholar; Thom's Irish almanac and official directory (Dublin, published annually); and Burke, Bernard, Burke's genealogical and heraldic history of the landed gentry of Ireland, ed. Pine, L. G. (4th edn, London, 1958)Google Scholar.
35 Nominal data derived from UG, 17 Oct. 1908, 23 Oct., 25 Dec. 1909, 23 Apr. 1910, 8 Mar. 1913; IT, 16 Oct., 17 Nov., 30 Apr., 17 Dec. 1909, 19 Apr. 1910, 20 July 1912, 4 Feb. 1920; Freeman's Journal (FJ), 9 Oct., 3 Nov. 1908, 17 Dec. 1909, 29 Nov. 1910, 28 Feb. 1913; II, 2 July 1914; Irish Press, 18 Oct. 1937; Douglas, James G., Memoirs of Senator James G. Douglas (1887–1954): concerned citizen, ed. Anthony, J. Gaughan (Dublin, 1998), p. 50Google Scholar; William Seville to Lord Castletown, 21 Apr. 1909, Dublin, NLI, Castletown papers, MS 35,320 (8). [N=122].
36 For the IPHRA leadership, see Loughlin, ‘The Irish Protestant Home Rule Association’, p. 343.
37 IT, 18, 21 July 1906; Donegal News, 20 Jan. 1912; McMinn, Against the tide, p. xlvii; J. W. Kirk to Rev. James Brown Armour, 7 Feb. 1906, Belfast, Public Record Office of Northern Ireland (PRONI), Armour papers; Henry H. Graham to Robert Carson, 18 Oct. 1913, PRONI, T2077/13. Names of ULA activists checked against specimen years of Thom's Irish almanac and official directory.
38 London Times, 13 Sept. 1948; de Burgh, U. H. Hussey, The landowners of Ireland (Dublin, 1878), p. 189Google Scholar.
39 In 1911, the Protestant proportion of each Ulster county or county borough was approximately as follows: Antrim, 79.5 per cent; Armagh, 54.7 per cent; Belfast, 75.9 per cent; Cavan, 18.5 per cent; Donegal, 21 per cent; Down, 68.5 per cent; Fermanagh, 43.8 per cent; Derry County, 58.5 per cent; Derry County Borough, 43.8 per cent; Monaghan, 25.3 per cent; Tyrone, 44.6 per cent:Vaughan, W. E. and Fitzpatrick, A. J., Irish historical statistics: population, 1821–1971 (Dublin, 1978), pp. 66–8Google Scholar.
40 Patterson, Henry, ‘Sectarianism revisited: the provisional IRA campaign in a border region of Northern Ireland’, Terrorism and Political Violence, 22 (2010), pp. 337–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
41 See, for example, UG, 4 May, 6 July, 21 Sept. 1907. See also below.
42 UG, 11, 18, 25 May, 1 June 1907.
43 For the IOO, see Boyle, John W., ‘The Belfast Protestant Association and the Independent Orange Order, 1901–1910’, Irish Historical Studies, 13, 50 (1962), pp. 117–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Patterson, Henry, ‘Independent Orangeism and class conflict in Edwardian Belfast: a reinterpretation’, Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy. Section C: Archaeology, Celtic Studies, History, Linguistics, Literature, 80C (1980), pp. 1–27Google Scholar; Murray, Peter, ‘Radical way forward or sectarian cul-de-sac? Lindsay Crawford and Independent Orangeism reassessed’, Saothar, 27 (2002), pp. 31–42Google Scholar.
44 See Conor Morrissey, ‘Protestant nationalists in Ireland, 1900–1923’ (Ph.D. thesis, Trinity College Dublin, 2015), ch. 2.
45 Irish Protestant, 22 July 1905.
46 Irish Protestant, 23 Jan. 1904.
47 Grand Orange Lodge of Ireland, Belfast (GOLI), Independent Orange Order collection, Independent Orange Institution of Ireland, Grand Lodge report, 1907 (Belfast, 1907)Google Scholar.
48 See report, UG, 12 Jan. 1907.
49 See UG, 12, 26 Jan., 2, 9, 16 Feb. 1907.
50 The directors were Hugh Mack, Henry Havelock Graham, Samuel Robert Keightly, and John R. Moorhead.
51 IT, 4 Sept. 1920.
52 See below.
53 UG, 10 Dec. 1910.
54 Ulster Herald, 2 Sept. 1911; IT, 19 July 1913.
55 25,506 for the Ulster Unionist Party; 20,339 for the ULA.
56 For a discussion, see Jackson, The Ulster Party, pp. 270–1.
57 Northern Constitution, 1 Nov. 1913, qu. in McMinn, Against the tide, p. lvii.
58 FJ, 15 Nov. 1913.
59 Donegal News, 4 May 1912.
60 UG, 10 Dec. 1910.
61 24,874 for the Ulster Unionist Party; 19,003 for the ULA.
62 Ulster Liberal Association, What Liberalism has done for the people: points in the Liberal policy and in the Liberal record (Belfast, 1913)Google Scholar, pp. 3, 4, 8, 22, 6.
63 See below. For reference to ‘Rotten Protestants’, see, for example, UG, 10 Feb. 1912, FJ, 4 Apr., 3 Nov. 1917; Gwynn, Experiences of a literary man, p. 277.
64 FJ, 26 Jan. 1912. See also Armour, Armour of Ballymoney, pp. 252–5.
65 II, 24 Jan. 1912.
66 PRONI, D2846/1/2/1/2, clipping from the Belfast News-Letter, 27 Jan. 1912.
67 UG, 3 Feb. 1912; PRONI, D2846/1/2/1/2, clipping from an unknown newspaper, 26 Jan. 1912; PRONI, D2846/1/2/1/3, clipping from the Irish News, 6 Feb. 1912.
68 UG, 10 Feb. 1912.
69 IT, 9 Feb. 1912; Irish Press, 25 Jan. 1965. See also Jenkins, Roy, Churchill (London, 2001), pp. 234–6Google Scholar.
70 UG, 10 Feb. 1912. For an extended discussion of this speech, see Bew, Paul, Churchill and Ireland (Oxford, 2016), pp. 52–8Google Scholar.
71 Donegal News, 6 Dec. 1913.
72 Fitzpatrick, David, Descendancy: Irish Protestant histories since 1795 (Cambridge, 2014), p. 108CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
73 Ibid., pp. 142, 144.
74 Ulster Liberal Association, What Liberalism has done for the people, p. 26.
75 Ulster Herald, 16 Jan. 1909.
76 Cork Constitution, 29 Jan. 1903.
77 UG, 16, 23 Jan. 1909.
78 For contemporary references to attacks on Protestant home rulers in Belfast, especially ship workers, see Rosamond Stephen to John Baptist Crozier, archbishop of Armagh, 30 July 1912, Dublin, Representative Church Body Library, Rosamond Stephen papers; UG, 20, 27 Apr., 27 July, 3, 10 Aug. 1912; House of Commons debates, 31 July 1912, cc. 41, 2091–8, 2111–13, 2122–7, 2129–33, 2148–9; Connaught Tribune, 29 Nov. 1913; Connaught Telegraph, 14 Sept. 1912, 5 Apr. 1913, 9 May 1914; FJ, 26, 28 Sept. 1912, 29 Mar., 30 Apr. 1913; Anglo-Celt, 3 May, 3, 10, 17, 24 Aug. 1912; Southern Star, 21 Sept. 1913; II, 7 Nov. 1913; Limerick Leader, 7 Aug. 1912; Manchester Guardian, 18 Sept. 1912.
79 Manchester Guardian, 8 July 1912.
80 UG, 4 Apr. 1914.
81 GOLI, Independent Orange Order collection, Orange Independent, Jan., May 1913.
82 Johnston, Joseph, Civil war in Ulster: its objects and probable results (Dublin, 1913)Google Scholar.
83 IT, 8 Jan. 1913.
84 Osborne O'Reilly to George Fitzhardinge Berkeley, 23 Jan. 1913; Osborne O'Reilly to George Fitzhardinge Berkeley, 4 Mar. 1913; Osborne O'Reilly to George Fitzhardinge Berkeley, 6 Feb. 1913, Cork City and County Archives, Berkeley papers, PR12.
85 Weekly Irish Times, 18 Jan. 1913.
86 FJ, 6 Feb. 1913 (South-east Cork United Irish League (UIL) executive); FJ, 1 Feb. 1913 (Mountjoy Ward branch of the UIL, Dublin City); Southern Star, 8 Feb. 1913 (Bandon Town Commission, Co. Cork); Anglo-Celt, 26 July 1913 (East Cavan UIL); Donegal News, 9 Aug. 1913 (UIL branch in Ballyliffin, Co. Donegal); Anglo-Celt, 22 Mar. 1913 (Knockbride east division of the Ancient Order of Hibernians, Co. Cavan).
87 From accounts or analysis of the meeting listed, broadly speaking, from hostile to sympathetic, see McNeill, Ronald, Ulster's stand for the union (London, 1922), p. 158Google Scholar; McMinn, ‘The Ballymoney meeting of 1913 – a nationalist mirage?’; McMinn, ‘Liberalism in North Antrim’, p. 28; McMinn, Against the tide, pp. liv–lviii; Bowen, Desmond, History and the shaping of Irish Protestantism (New York, NY, 1995)Google Scholar; Association, Ullans Speakers, A ripple in the pond: the home rule revolt in North Antrim (Ballymoney, 2013)Google Scholar; McDowell, R. B., Alice Stopford Green: a passionate historian (Dublin, 1967), pp. 93–5Google Scholar; Reid, B. L., The lives of Roger Casement (New Haven, CT, and London, 1976), pp. 178–9Google Scholar; Bardon, Jonathan, A history of Ulster (Belfast, 1992), pp. 440–1Google Scholar; Phoenix, Eamon et al. ., eds., Feis na nGleann: a century of Gaelic culture in the Antrim Glens (Belfast, 2005), pp. 59–61Google Scholar; Campbell, Flann, The dissenting voice: Protestant democracy in Ulster from plantation to partition (Dublin, 1991) pp. 419–21Google Scholar; Armour, Armour of Ballymoney, pp. 280–3; O'Brien, Bill, Alternative Ulster covenant (Dublin, 2013)Google Scholar.
88 McMinn, ‘The Ballymoney meeting of 1913 – a nationalist mirage?’.
89 Alice Stopford Green, qu. in McDowell, Alice Stopford Green, p. 94.
90 Phoenix et al., eds., Feis na nGleann, p. 60. See also James Brown Armour to W. S. Armour, 27 Oct. 1913; James Brown Armour to J. B. M. Armour [n.d. Oct.? 1913], in McMinn, Against the tide, pp. 133–5.
91 McNeill, Ulster's stand for the union, p. 158.
92 For a recent account, see O'Brien, Alternative Ulster covenant.
93 North Antrim Standard, 30 Oct. 1913; UG, 1 Nov. 1913. Fifteen women have also been identified; these have been excluded from the following calculation, as the Ulster Guardian almost never provided names of women who attended ULA meetings – their inclusion in the set would skew the figure.
94 The North Antrim Standard described the event as a ‘meeting of Liberals’: 30 Oct. 1913. See also Belfast News-Letter, 26 Nov. 1913.
95 UG, 1 Nov. 1913. For a full account of the speeches, see [Various authors], A Protestant protest: Ballymoney, Oct. 24th 1913 (Ballymoney, 1913).
96 Text of counter-covenant given in Ullans Speakers Association, A ripple in the pond, p. 16.
97 O'Brien, Alternative Ulster covenant, p. 7.
98 Donegal News, 8 Nov., 6 Dec. 1913. For Roger Casement's delighted reaction to the Scarva meeting, see Roger Casement to Alice Stopford Green, 4 Nov. 1913, NLI, Roger Casement additional papers, MS 36,204/1.
99 Belfast News-Letter, 26 Nov. 1913.
100 Fanning, Fatal path, pp. 96–7.
101 II, 25 Nov. 1914.
102 Ulster Liberal Association, The Kaiser's Ulster friends: pro-German speeches by prominent Carsonites (n.p., 1914).
103 Fanning, Fatal path, pp. 145–9.
104 Henry H. Graham to David Lloyd George, 7 June 1916, London, Parliamentary Archives (PAL), Lloyd George papers, D/14/3.
105 John Gulland to David Lloyd George, 28 June 1916, PAL, Lloyd George papers, D/14/3.
106 Office of David Lloyd George to Henry H. Graham, 29 June 1916, PAL, Lloyd George papers, D/14/3.
107 UG, 23, 30 Nov. 1918.
108 UG, 14 Dec. 1918.
109 UG, 14 Dec. 1918. Davey eventually sued Carson for libel, and sought £5,000 damages. The case was withdrawn when Carson offered a further apology in court: Manchester Guardian, 26 Apr. 1919.
- 4
- Cited by